Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice I just ordered some with 12mm offset Thanks alot

no problem..post pics after
  • Like 1
Posted

After spending a few nights reading through this thread I've decided I'm going to go with the RC 2.5 leveling kit with a 275/70/18 on the stock rim. So thanks guys for all the great info! Does anyone have a picture of what the 2.5 kit looks like with the 2 inch block in the rear? I'm on the fence on if I need to put the bigger block in or not.

Posted

Does anyone know where the best price can be had on all 4 rancho shocks 2 x RS999901 and 2 x RS999198. Everywhere I have seen sells them separate. I thought there should be somewhere that sells all 4 at a discount.

I searched for a while and could not find any better price for all 4, seems like the mfg is controlling the price they can be sold at. go to gorancho.com they have a mail in rebate/gift card for $126. I mailed my stuff in yesterday. So I paid $552.92 delivered less $126 works out to $427.

Posted

 

 

Can someone answer if dealership can reset my speedometer..couldn't find a thread on it. Thanks

I had my truck at the dealership the other day for some warranty work and asked if there was some way to recalibrate mine. The service writer said he was pretty sure they could. When I went back to pick it up, he said they couldn't do it because GM can only recalibrate by entering in one of their "preselected factory spec'd sizes". They do not custom calibrate by height or circumference, only by plugging in an actual tire size...ex P275-55-20, into their calibration tool.

I figure it was noted on my truck's service record, so now if I do it myself with the Hypertech Tool, I'm somewhat covered. If they say something about it later, I'll claim that I had to do it myself to have a legal speedometer and odometer.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well I'm officially burned out from reading through most of this thread. I can't decide what leveling kit to get, Seems like they all get the job done. My question is for those that plan to keep the truck for a long time, are you worried about any long term effects on the suspension?

 

I plan on keeping my '14 Sierra 2wd for as long as I can. I'm looking for a 2in level. Which would be best kit for? Something like an RC or Pro Comp? Or replacing the shocks with Bilstein or Rancho?

You're exactly right. They all get the job done. Even the stuff from eBay. When you're only talking about a spacer, it really doesn't matter that much. A Pro Comp spacer is probably the most expensive ($150 for 1.5") and it isn't any better than the same thing you can get elsewhere for a lot less money. As far as durability concerns and wear and tear, good for you that it is for your 2WD so no CV axle angles to worry about. Maybe some ball joints and premature strut wear but it should be awhile before you have to deal with that as long as you're not beating it to hell off-roading every day.

Posted

1.5 zone body lift . 2.5 summit performance leveling kit front only 20-9 ballistic anvil +12 offset. 33-12.50 r 20 atturo trail blade xt no rubbing.factory 36 front 39 rear after 41 1/2 front and back.

 

nice looking truck! cant wait to put the 1.5 body on mine, can barely notice its a body lift

Posted

After spending a few nights reading through this thread I've decided I'm going to go with the RC 2.5 leveling kit with a 275/70/18 on the stock rim. So thanks guys for all the great info! Does anyone have a picture of what the 2.5 kit looks like with the 2 inch block in the rear? I'm on the fence on if I need to put the bigger block in or not.

post-136551-0-85441300-1425658658_thumb.jpgpost-136551-0-26764800-1425658672_thumb.jpg

The first two are with the stock 1" block

post-136551-0-73851500-1425658737_thumb.jpgpost-136551-0-21484000-1425659316.jpg

The second two are with the RC 2" block

 

Originally I installed the front and drove the truck like that for about 5 months. It made it dead level. However, even though measurement wise it was dead level it looked like the front was a little higher than the rear. So, I installed the rear 2" blocks and that made the rear right at 1" higher than the front. I personally think it looks best with the 2" block but it is all personal preference. With the stock 1" block at some angles it looked leveled and at others it looked higher in the front and I do not like the "higher in the front" look. So, if I were you I would install the front, ride with it like that for a little while and see how you like it. Then, if you don't like it or if you just want to change it up, put the rear 2" blocks on. I also think once I put bigger tires on it the little bit of rake I have won't be as noticable. Good luck with the lift! Post pics after and holler if you have any questions.

post-136551-0-85441300-1425658658_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-26764800-1425658672_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-73851500-1425658737_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-21484000-1425659316.jpg

post-136551-0-85441300-1425658658_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-26764800-1425658672_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-73851500-1425658737_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-21484000-1425659316.jpg

post-136551-0-85441300-1425658658_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-26764800-1425658672_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-73851500-1425658737_thumb.jpg

post-136551-0-21484000-1425659316.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

You're exactly right. They all get the job done. Even the stuff from eBay. When you're only talking about a spacer, it really doesn't matter that much. A Pro Comp spacer is probably the most expensive ($150 for 1.5") and it isn't any better than the same thing you can get elsewhere for a lot less money. As far as durability concerns and wear and tear, good for you that it is for your 2WD so no CV axle angles to worry about. Maybe some ball joints and premature strut wear but it should be awhile before you have to deal with that as long as you're not beating it to hell off-roading every day.

 

 

I ran a 2 inch level on my 07 nnbs and only issues were cv boots tore. Obviously you don't have to worry about that happening. That happened at around 90xxx miles. Many have had ball joint issues in the long run, but I never did. I traded it at 111xxx miles. Heck I still had stock brakes on it.

 

Thanks for the input guys. I guess its just me being scared to pull the trigger. I'll probably end up going with an RC 2", since that's most seem to be running in here. I'll enjoy the looks now and let future me worry about any problems, if any. :fingersx:

Posted

For the RC 2.5 kit, if you want rake install new supplied block. If you want level, stick with factory block. I actually sit 3/8 inch higher in rear with 2.5 front and stock rear block.

Posted (edited)

Alright fellas, I have read every post on this board regarding the Bilsteins and I believe I have the right set up in mind but would like some feedback. My goal maybe counter-intuitive, but I would like to keep the rake and and would like to achieve a smoother more controlled ride with minimal impact to MPG. The only thing keeping me from the Bilsteins Leveling shocks is that they only provide 1.8" of lift, and I do not find that Bilstein makes a 5100 in a non ride height adjustable shock and have been advised not to use them on the lowest setting in conjunction with a spacer.



My Current Truck is the crew max tow without the Rancho Shocks



If I have done my research appropriately (reading other Members Posts) the below set up should give me exactly what I want with little to no MPG impact



Any feedback would be greatly appreciated



Bilstein 4600 front


Pro Comp (63235) 2.25" Level Lift (2.25 appeals greatly to me and I am not a fan of Rancho products)


2" Rear Block


Bilstein 5100 rear



Later add 275/60/20 Ms2's Larger diameter than my Eagle's but the same weight and I love this tire, many members say this size and tire does not impact their MPG.


Edited by MATTSD
Posted

 

nice looking truck! cant wait to put the 1.5 body on mine, can barely notice its a body lift

I did put the rugged wheel liners in to cover any gap above rear tires .. they turned out great..
Posted (edited)

I installed a 3/4" leveling kit (resultant lift of 1-1/2" higher in front) on my truck yesterday.

 

Tips about task (some may have been mentioned before in here):

 

- Raised both wheels off the ground in front. Place jack stand under vehicle (one each under fame's rails on either side of vehicle).

- loosen the anti-sway bar end bolt until top of the nut is flush with bolt end).

- It's easier to do with front wheels off.

- other side is easier once one side is bolted in with leveling spacer.

- Go back and tighten the anti-roll bar bolt/nut once spacers are in place.

- Take vehicle in for an alignment.

 

Sorry. I didn't take a "before" picture. Oh, and I finally installed the GM's front mud guards. You have to drill into the fender opening (I used 7/32, 9/32, and 23/64 drill bits; only use the mudflap for the initial drilling of the holes [2 each] and install a 6mm rivet nut), I found a rivet nut tool in eBay that works pretty good and it is low cost.

 

[edited for grammar]

 

20150307_004728175_iOS%20%281024x768%29.

 

 

20150307_005132000_iOS%20%28600x800%29.j

Edited by GerryLP
Posted

9bebca36ff872c7d4d7d43601ace6637.jpg8c21eb99a9522468f7c3c3b1ce55341b.jpg

I finally got my wheels and tires on with my 2.5" leveling kit. Tires are 275/65-20

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...