Jump to content

2014+ Lowering / Drop Kits

mjw930

By mjw930
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

204-WPG Enthusiast

204-WPG

Posted
Posted

Just an update, after three years in the making, finally i got  my 275/35 r24 on a 4/6 drop.

D76F25D7-5CE4-4994-9993-CD758754B022.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Heavy_Static
Heavy_Static

A few pics from last week:    

bakerrr
bakerrr

First post here Picked her about 2 weeks ago couldn't wait to start modifying it. Just installed Belltechs 4/7 drop this weekend It's low enough for the time being ??  

Nasty
Nasty

Posted Images

UofAZCats Enthusiast

UofAZCats

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 204-WPG said:

Just an update, after three years in the making, finally i got  my 275/35 r24 on a 4/6 drop.

D76F25D7-5CE4-4994-9993-CD758754B022.jpeg

That is a great looking truck.  Well done.

UofAZCats Enthusiast

UofAZCats

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, 204-WPG said:

Just what I thought. Have you tried reaching out to Belltech to inquire if this flip kit install set up can also be done? I am just worried of the safety aspect, that’s all.

I had driven around with the bottom plate on top and no plate on the bottom for over a year with the only concern being that the rear wheels looked like they were moving back in the wheel well.  Part of that I attribute to the lack of a plate on the bottom that would hold the u-bolts in place.  With this set up the top plate (which is on the bottom) is held in place by the leaf spring bolt and this holds the u-bolts in place.  The purpose of the plates and the u-bolts is to hold the axle and leaf spring together in the right spot.  With the bolt on the bottom and another in the top holding the plates in the right spot it shouldn't matter which plate is where.  Belltech shouldn't answer the question because of liability concerns, so no I didn't bother to ask them.

Steveo553 Enthusiast

Steveo553

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, 204-WPG said:

Just an update, after three years in the making, finally i got  my 275/35 r24 on a 4/6 drop.

D76F25D7-5CE4-4994-9993-CD758754B022.jpeg

Congrats on getting it done.  Looks very good!

SeekAndDestroy Enthusiast

SeekAndDestroy

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, UofAZCats said:

 The purpose of the plates and the u-bolts is to hold the axle and leaf spring together in the right spot.  With the bolt on the bottom and another in the top holding the plates in the right spot it shouldn't matter which plate is where. 

Do you have any driveline vibration? I thought the bottom plate tilted the rear diff up to keep the driveline angles good.

UofAZCats Enthusiast

UofAZCats

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SeekAndDestroy said:

Do you have any driveline vibration? I thought the bottom plate tilted the rear diff up to keep the driveline angles good.

I haven't noticed any vibration.  I hadn't thought about your question but in thinking about it with the way the plates were situated with the top plate on the bottom centered on the leaf spring bolt it sits a little forward of the bottom plate on top so the u-bolts are angled from bottom front to top rear which pushes the bottom plate on top forward which would tilt the axle forward a small amount.

UofAZCats Enthusiast

UofAZCats

Posted
Posted
On 9/14/2020 at 6:06 PM, SeekAndDestroy said:

Do you have any driveline vibration? I thought the bottom plate tilted the rear diff up to keep the driveline angles good.

 

On 9/14/2020 at 8:18 PM, UofAZCats said:

I haven't noticed any vibration.  I hadn't thought about your question but in thinking about it with the way the plates were situated with the top plate on the bottom centered on the leaf spring bolt it sits a little forward of the bottom plate on top so the u-bolts are angled from bottom front to top rear which pushes the bottom plate on top forward which would tilt the axle forward a small amount.

 

Well I was wrong.  I got the second RAS installed last night and tightened them both down.  I had a vibration in the lower speeds that either got a little worse as the day went on or my patience for it got worse.  When I got home from dinner tonight I took them off.  I have thought about it and the top plate which was mounted on the bottom was pushed forward it because that plate only has one hole in the middle of the plate.  The plate on the bottom though is supposed to be offset from the leaf spring bolt and not centered.  If I can get a hole drilled in the plate in the right location I should be able to fix the vibration problem. 

 

Another option I am considering is using the original stock block that came between the axle and the leaf springs.  The block has a hole on one side of the block that could fit on the bottom of the leaf spring and has its own nub on the opposite side of the block.  As I noted in my original the bottom plate in its correct location did not leave room for the RAS arm to get under the leaf spring.  With the block on the bottom of the leaf spring the correct bottom plate could be installed on the bottom of that which would allow enough space to install the RAS arm as it is supposed to.  The reason I didn't try that is because that block has ridges in the side with the nub that would keep the plate from sitting flat.  To use the block would require getting those ridges cut off.  

 

Either option likely needs a machine shop because I don't have the tools.  

 

The other issue is that with the RAS tightened down it lifted the rear end 1 inch which I am not cool with at all.  Before the install I have a leaf spring connected to the 2" drop shackle at the second hole (the one closest to the reverse hanger which is the 1.5" setting) of the two holes. There are no other holes that could be used to offset the extra inch with those shackles.  I have my stock shackles but those would really drop the rear and have it lower than the front.  Based on comparison of the drop shackle to the stock shackle there is like a 3" difference in length between hole locations so I am not sure how the drop shackles are only considered 2" drop shackles with a 3" difference.  Not sure if the sell a 1" drop shackle or not.  Anyone with ideas to help with this issue is appreciated.  To me this may be the tougher issue to address.

SeekAndDestroy Enthusiast

SeekAndDestroy

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, UofAZCats said:

I got the second RAS installed last night and tightened them both down.  I had a vibration in the lower speeds that either got a little worse as the day went on or my patience for it got worse. The plate on the bottom though is supposed to be offset from the leaf spring bolt and not centered.  If I can get a hole drilled in the plate in the right location I should be able to fix the vibration problem. 

 

The other issue is that with the RAS tightened down it lifted the rear end 1 inch which I am not cool with at all.  Before the install I have a leaf spring connected to the 2" drop shackle

The only benefit from the RAS is towing. If I wanted to tow with my lowered truck I would put air bags and a rear sway bar on. You mentioned that you don't tow so I assume you are trying to get more traction or just a tighter rear end feeling. A set of traction bars, like Cal-Tracs, and a rear sway bar will probably get you a similar feeling to the RAS, and way less hassle to install. Traction bars mount under the leaf springs and the Hellwig sway bar works for our trucks that have a flip kit. I ordered the sway bar and will be installing it soon.

 

Personally I wouldn't modify the flip kit. It was designed to keep the pinion angle set properly to keep vibration, and wear on the u-joints to a minimum. If you are going to run it with the top and bottom plates flipped around and modified, it might twist the u-bolts into an unnatural position and they will eventually break. You will also have to put shims in to correct the pinion angle.

 

The shackles aren't really "drop" shackles they are actually lift shackles. The flip kit by itself (with factory shackles) lowers the rear 7" and then you get shackles to raise it back up the desired amount. So if you have 2" shackles then your rear is lowered by 5". They do make them in 1" increments because you can have anywhere from a 4" total drop to a 7" drop in the rear, with a flip kit.

 

In the end its your truck, but I would put the flip kit back to "stock" and sell the RAS, then buy traction bars and a sway bar. These will not change the drop height and you won't have to worry about changing the shackles. Also the pinion angle will be way closer to factory spec as Belltech designed into the flip kit.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Dinner Enthusiast

Dinner

Posted
Posted
On 10/15/2020 at 9:01 PM, Melks said:

2/5 

Screen Shot 2020-10-15 at 9.01.23 PM.png

Looks great, love those wheels. 

Dinner Enthusiast

Dinner

Posted
Posted

Belltech 4/7 with 0.5" lift shackle. Only a few more drives before winter storage 

thumbnail_IMG_0178.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
666 Enthusiast

666

Posted
Posted

Hey, I have a 2016 Silverado 4x4  crew cab and was wondering if I would have any alignment issues.  I'm trying to go with a 3/6 but camber and alignment issues are what is really making me worried. The kit is a maxtrac which comes with 2 inch drop spindles, 1 inch drop spring, and a adjustable flip kit 5 to 6 inches of drop. Do any of you have experience with aligning a dropped 4x4? 

 

Here is the kit: https://maxtracstore.com/2014-2016-chevy-silverado-1500-2wd-4wd-1pc-drive-shaft-3-5-lowering-kit-maxtrac-ks331535/ 

 

Here is a picture of the truck(Note: this truck has been crashed before): 20201006-145839-1.jpg

sharkeysierra Enthusiast

sharkeysierra

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, 666 said:

Hey, I have a 2016 Silverado 4x4  crew cab and was wondering if I would have any alignment issues.  I'm trying to go with a 3/6 but camber and alignment issues are what is really making me worried. The kit is a maxtrac which comes with 2 inch drop spindles, 1 inch drop spring, and a adjustable flip kit 5 to 6 inches of drop. Do any of you have experience with aligning a dropped 4x4? 

 

Here is the kit: https://maxtracstore.com/2014-2016-chevy-silverado-1500-2wd-4wd-1pc-drive-shaft-3-5-lowering-kit-maxtrac-ks331535/ 

 

Here is a picture of the truck(Note: this truck has been crashed before): 20201006-145839-1.jpg

Did it align properly before the crash? 
 

With a 3” drop, you will be fine. Once you get into 4” in front, alignment concerns are valid. 

666 Enthusiast

666

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sharkeysierra said:

Did it align properly before the crash? 
 

With a 3” drop, you will be fine. Once you get into 4” in front, alignment concerns are valid. 

It aligned after the crash with no problems

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      You got that Hengst D110??
    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • parthery
      GM Hard Folding Tonneau by REV review

      By parthery · Posted

      Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...