Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thx man!

 

And the truck does rides better, but its not night and day. I'm not sure if my truck is particularly rough compared to others but I the 5100's only helped out a bit. They do smooth out larger uneven surfaces quite well and the truck doesn't bounce as much which has helped more when towing. They are a good upgrade but your milage will vary, just depends what your expectations are. I'm interested in further improving my ride quality though. I came from a 2005 Dodge 2500 which was crazy stiff, and while my GM is less stiff, it still doesn't have that famous "GMC ride quality" My basis of comparison is my roommates 2013 SLE and my Dads 2013 F150 King Ranch, both of which are much smother and take in rough roads better than my truck.

 

Springrates were increased in 2014 to improve payload ratings and towing stability. At the end of day one needs to decide whether they want a trucky-truck or a soft car-like truck. The narrow sidewall of the 20/22's that come with a lot of these trucks isn't doing the ride quality any favors either.

Posted

 

Springrates were increased in 2014 to improve payload ratings and towing stability. At the end of day one needs to decide whether they want a trucky-truck or a soft car-like truck. The narrow sidewall of the 20/22's that come with a lot of these trucks isn't doing the ride quality any favors either.

 

Yup. But even for a half-ton pickup I think they are on the stiffer side, especially when compared to its competitors. Pickup trucks have come along way, just because they are a trucks doesn't mean they have to behave like traditional trucks from they hey'day. If so we would still be running 300hp V8's with 4 speed transmissions and shift lever activated transfer cases. I don't want to turn this thread into a GM vs Ford thread but I've driven other trucks that ride better than mine, and I am willing to spend some money on my truck to make it ride better.

 

I have been looking up information on what type of springs and spring rates GM uses on the new 2014 trucks and haven't found anything. At this point I've come to the realization that I will need a dedicated set of coilovers to really improve the ride. I will be upgrading to 18's with wither a 285/65 or 275/70 here in a month or so, hopefully that helps.

Posted (edited)

Yup. But even for a half-ton pickup I think they are on the stiffer side, especially when compared to its competitors. Pickup trucks have come along way, just because they are a trucks doesn't mean they have to behave like traditional trucks from they hey'day. If so we would still be running 300hp V8's with 4 speed transmissions and shift lever activated transfer cases. I don't want to turn this thread into a GM vs Ford thread but I've driven other trucks that ride better than mine, and I am willing to spend some money on my truck to make it ride better.

 

I have been looking up information on what type of springs and spring rates GM uses on the new 2014 trucks and haven't found anything. At this point I've come to the realization that I will need a dedicated set of coilovers to really improve the ride. I will be upgrading to 18's with wither a 285/65 or 275/70 here in a month or so, hopefully that helps.

Definitely on the stiffer side...stiffer than my 2011 Silvy was...Bilsteins helped mainly with the bounce and handling on the '14. I think Spurshot but Fox coil overs on and said it improved ride for both on and off road. Edited by chuckl1218
Posted

Thanks for the help everyone! Can't wait to see how my truck comes out. Also putting on 10 ply, 275/75/18 tires at the same time. The tires come with free alignment and they will put on the bilstein ' s for me for $60. If supply the shocks. Seems like a good deal.

 

You'll like how it rides with the 10 ply tires and the Bilsteins. Mine is very comfortable.

Posted

I have been looking up information on what type of springs and spring rates GM uses on the new 2014 trucks and haven't found anything. At this point I've come to the realization that I will need a dedicated set of coilovers to really improve the ride. I will be upgrading to 18's with wither a 285/65 or 275/70 here in a month or so, hopefully that helps.

18's or 17's defnitely help the ride. I ditched the factory 20' and never looked back.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

:confused: with 10 ply tires versus stock?

 

Tyler

 

 

 

Stock tires are load range SL, meaning standard load. They are P rated tires, for Passenger. Which means they are good up to 35 psi of pressure.

 

10 ply tires are load range E, meaning they are good up to 80 psi. Which is considerably more. They are typically heavier duty tires and I think they ride better, and handle better than standard P rated tires.

 

Granted if you air up load range E tires to the max, they will ride rough. But when properly inflated they will ride nicer. IMHO

Edited by fondupot
Posted

 

:confused: with 10 ply tires versus stock?

 

Tyler

I spend a fair amount of time on rough and rocky roads, sometimes with heavy loads. 4 ply tires are nearly worthless on a dirt road. 6 ply aren't bad, 8 ply are preferable but hard to find. 10 ply are usually on 3/4 ton trucks but work great on 1/2 tons also. I hate changing flat tires.
Posted

So what is the best option in just trying to level the vehicle? I am wanting to level my truck but I'm completely new to customizing trucks. I saw the leveling kits are around $60 or so? Then however much it cost to get those installed.

 

Where the billistens 5100s are like $130 a piece right? I'm not sure how much it would cost to get these installed. But the ride would be a lot better with these right?

 

I've noticed when going over speed bumps or bumps in the road the original shocks don't seem to absorb the hit much at all or bounce you around inside the cab. Any help or info on my other questions would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Also, it seemed like the 5100s can only lift the front 1.8 inches or so, is that true? I thought the 2 inch or 2.5 inches looks a lot better. I just saw one before after pic of the 5100s installed and it still seems like you can see a slight slope with the front end being a little lower? Am I crazy and just seeing things or does it really seem to be that way?

The Bilsteins do offer an improved ride quality compared to the OE shocks in various departments, how much is subjective though. And yes, they only lift the front end 1.8" on the tallest setting. If you want a perfect level your gonna need another .2" or do the 3rd setting from the bottom on the 5100's, 1.25", and then do a .75" strut spacer to get your even 2"

 

5100's with already installed 2.5" leveling kit? Is this a no no?

 

 

It depends on how much overall lift you want. If you add the 5100's to the RC 2.5" kit your gonna have to mount the spring perch on the lowest setting to retain use of your RC lower and upper spacer. If you increase the spring perch height on the shock and keep the RC spacers your gonna get a 2.5" lift plus whatever lift the 5100's give you. At this point you would probably need to upgrade your UCA.

 

Also, it depends on the type of spacer used on the front coilovers. If its one of those spacers that goes in between the spring and top hat I would say no, because these type of spacers increase the spring pre-load and would result in a very stiff front end. There is a user on this thread a few pages back that did this and ended up removing the shocks because it was crazy stiff.

 

If its a spacer that goes in between the top hat and shock mount that should be ok.

Posted

I got tired of waiting for the 6112's so I pulled the trigger on Fox coilovers. They're spendy at $430 a pop but the ride is fantastic. I went with Cognito ball joint UCA's, Fox Shox premier coilovers and difff drop spacers. As far as leveling It cost more than a spacer kit but it's doing it right with added travel and a better ride. They come set at 2" lift from Fox. By the way, on my 2015 Sierra half ton I put 275/70-R18 Goodrich TA KO2 tires (33"x10.8") on the factory wheels before doing the lift and they fit without any rubbing at stock height.

Have you installed them already? Why did you get UCA's also? I got Fox's at all 4 corners as well and love them.

 

Josh

Posted

Definitely can't go wrong with Fox shocks & Fox coilovers. True, they are pricey but well worth the money you spend on the quality and performance. Much better than Bilsteins offering, you made a good decision.

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

5100's with already installed 2.5" leveling kit? Is this a no no?

It's not something you would want to do. With that total amount of front lift, approximately 4.5", your CV angles are going to be horrific!

For that amount of lift, you would need front diff relocation brackets to flatten out your axel angles, different upper control arms at the least.

2.5" of front lift is the maximum you would want to go without correction. It can be done the way you ask but you would need additional parts for your front end components to last. If you really are looking for about 4" of lift, a complete quality lift kit is the way to go for sure.

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

I installed 5100s in my last truck. 2004 Nissan Titan 4x4. I installed them on the highest setting. It leveled the truck very nicely. Though I never had any problems with the shocks or components.....it definitely made the ride pretty harsh. I got use to it after a while. Even drove across the country with it. Bumps in the road were harsh though.

 

I'm contemplating if I even went to mess with my 2014 Silverado. I was thinking of leveling it or lifting it. Only it rides so nice and smooth right now. I'm not sure I want to risk messing that up. Lifting the truck would make it look great, but using my truck for work and loading quads in it would make a lift unpractical for me I think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...