Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So guys that have put this in the 4.3, the port on the valve cover goes to the inlet of the can and the outlet goes to the port that goes into the side if the intake manifold correct? Or reverse?

Posted (edited)

OK, I'm catch canned. Before you flame me, I catch canned both the clean and dirty sides of my 6.2 because from what I've seen of LS engines there is no clean side. I really like these ADD 1W catch cans, some of the best on the market.

 

post-127122-0-44259400-1425512151_thumb.jpgpost-127122-0-95557700-1425512201_thumb.jpg

post-127122-0-44259400-1425512151_thumb.jpg

post-127122-0-95557700-1425512201_thumb.jpg

post-127122-0-44259400-1425512151_thumb.jpg

post-127122-0-95557700-1425512201_thumb.jpg

post-127122-0-44259400-1425512151_thumb.jpg

post-127122-0-95557700-1425512201_thumb.jpg

Edited by Last C5
Posted

OK, I'm catch canned. Before you flame me, I catch canned both the clean and dirty sides of my 6.2 because from what I've seen of LS engines there is no clean side. I really like these ADD 1W catch cans, some of the best on the market.

 

attachicon.gifIMG_0090 (1024x744).jpgattachicon.gifIMG_0089 (1024x768).jpg

Nice job should keep it clean. What kind of 3/8 hose did you use. I see you used oem clip on ends did you cut them out of the old hoses or buy the ends.

Posted

Nice job should keep it clean. What kind of 3/8 hose did you use. I see you used oem clip on ends did you cut them out of the old hoses or buy the ends.

Thank you. I used AN -10 (5/8") push to lock hose on the the two clean air catch cans (mounted on the cowl) and standard pcv 3/8" hose on the dirty side catch can (mounted on the left fender). I bought two replacement OEM clean air hoses and one OEM dirty side hose and cut the fittings off them to use for all engine attachments. Probably would be cheaper to just buy the ends, but I couldn't find them at the time.

Posted

OK, I'm catch canned. Before you flame me, I catch canned both the clean and dirty sides of my 6.2 because from what I've seen of LS engines there is no clean side. I really like these ADD 1W catch cans, some of the best on the market.

 

attachicon.gifIMG_0090 (1024x744).jpgattachicon.gifIMG_0089 (1024x768).jpg

Let us know what is caught from the clean side please.

Posted

I just received my catch can in the mail today I purchased the silver color. The machining is impressive and the quality is first class, I just ordered a new foul air PCV hose from my dealer so I can use the quick connect fittings for the install it will take a week to get this as it needs to come from the USA. Hopefully by that time the weather will be above zero so I can do the install.

Posted

I just received my catch can in the mail today I purchased the silver color. The machining is impressive and the quality is first class, I just ordered a new foul air PCV hose from my dealer so I can use the quick connect fittings for the install it will take a week to get this as it needs to come from the USA. Hopefully by that time the weather will be above zero so I can do the install.

Can you elaborate on this?

 

Assuming this would be so that you can return to the stock hose arrangement?

 

I have an Add W1 to install.

Posted

Correct. I want to be able to quickly change it back if I decide to change my truck and reuse it on my next truck

Posted

So guys that have put this in the 4.3, the port on the valve cover goes to the inlet of the can and the outlet goes to the port that goes into the side if the intake manifold correct? Or reverse?

Anyone?
Posted (edited)

Anyone?

Not yet but I will be ordering it soon for my 4.3, but there some videos on YouTube and from that you can see what goes where. Shouldn't be different then the 5.3 Edited by NitroDatsik
Posted

I decided to do something different for adding media to the filter, I was afraid that the stainless steel pot scrubber material would somehow break apart and get sucked into the intake manifold so I went with stainless steel mesh instead I used key rings for spacers in between the mesh and assembled it. I also added O rings to the inlet & outlet fittings as well as the dipstick this will ensure there are no leaks. I am now working on fabricating an aluminum bracket to mount the can. Waiting for the weather to warm up to do the install. :)

 

http://s884.photobucket.com/user/fairvine/media/Sierra/IMG_20150307_085851.jpg.html?sort=3&o=3

 

http://s884.photobucket.com/user/fairvine/media/Sierra/IMG_20150307_090434.jpg.html?sort=3&o=0

 

http://s884.photobucket.com/user/fairvine/media/Sierra/IMG_20150307_090920.jpg.html?sort=3&o=1

Posted

I am a little confused by the Installs shown here as well as the ADD-W1 Instructions shown in post #1. Hoping we can sort this out.

 

ADD-W1 instructions shown in Post 1:

 

ADDW1_zps1jsunsbi.jpg

 

So the picture on the left shows the "dirty air" coming into the catch can as "Inlet". This makes sense as the dirty air comes into the can, swirls, larger stuff drops to bottom, vapor has to make the way up and THROUGH the internal filter/baffles (and other media if added) and exits out the "Outlet" as Clean Air. This is how both the RX and the Saikou system works.

 

The picture on the right though, with the red arrows, shows the exact opposite, which makes no sense. It looks like the dirty air is routed straight into the ADD W1's "Internal Filter", then into the open chamber and out. This seems backwards to all of the information I have researched regarding catch can construction. Am I reading the ADD W1's instructions wrong?

 

Here is the routing (with a video) of the Saikou system for reference:

smc_internal_design_565x725_zpssitxs8rx.

 

 

I think the ADD-W1 could be a viable alternative, but it seems like the instructions are backwards (the red arrows), as well as the their "outlet"/"inlet" markings on the can itself. I am thinking the design of the can is solid, but the markings are backwards.

 

Thoughts?

Posted

I am a little confused by the Installs shown here as well as the ADD-W1 Instructions shown in post #1. Hoping we can sort this out.

 

ADD-W1 instructions shown in Post 1:

 

ADDW1_zps1jsunsbi.jpg

 

So the picture on the left shows the "dirty air" coming into the catch can as "Inlet". This makes sense as the dirty air comes into the can, swirls, larger stuff drops to bottom, vapor has to make the way up and THROUGH the internal filter/baffles (and other media if added) and exits out the "Outlet" as Clean Air. This is how both the RX and the Saikou system works.

 

The picture on the right though, with the red arrows, shows the exact opposite, which makes no sense. It looks like the dirty air is routed straight into the ADD W1's "Internal Filter", then into the open chamber and out. This seems backwards to all of the information I have researched regarding catch can construction. Am I reading the ADD W1's instructions wrong?

 

Here is the routing (with a video) of the Saikou system for reference:

smc_internal_design_565x725_zpssitxs8rx.

 

 

I think the ADD-W1 could be a viable alternative, but it seems like the instructions are backwards (the red arrows), as well as the their "outlet"/"inlet" markings on the can itself. I am thinking the design of the can is solid, but the markings are backwards.

 

Thoughts?

Yeah, that does look backwards. I just pulled my instructions and they are the same.

 

The way I have mine set up; the hose from the dirty air (under the throttle body) goes into the can where the internal filter is at. The wire mesh stuff I have in the internal filter captures and water/oil and drips into the can. The clean air (side with the dip stick) connects to the side of the engine.

 

I hope mine is connected correctly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...