Jump to content

Denali cluster in SLT

NIXONRIDE

By NIXONRIDE
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

pgamboa Senior Enthusiast

pgamboa

Posted
Posted
Youre an alien though so you dont count.  With all your alien knowledge on wiring

Not for me. Lol. I send folks that link to page 29 for the part #s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

NIXONRIDE
NIXONRIDE

Thanks to Mr. Chris White I now have a Denali gauge cluster in my 2016 Sierra SLT. Once he did his programming it was plug and play. Everything works just like it does in My wife's 2016 Yukon Denali

GTPprix
GTPprix

You’ve been asking and we’ve been listening. Granted it took longer than anyone would have liked we are changing up our operations a bit to hopefully make things easier on everyone; especially the con

CaliBoy_661
CaliBoy_661

Well I got my Cluster already and already installed... here are some pictures from mine     Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted Images

GTPprix Senior Enthusiast

GTPprix

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Nasty said:

This should end the thread

 

1. Email white auto and media with your vin

 

2. Take the part number they give you and call pace performace or spemco enterprises

 

3. Order one

 

4. Pay for white auto and media service

 

5. Send your clusterto white auto and media

 

  The end

Actually step 1 is read this thread and find your own part number (or cut a hole in a box) from the list then email to confirm and the rest is correct LOL 

Edited by GTPprix
Nasty Senior Enthusiast

Nasty

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, GTPprix said:

Ding ding ding LOL :D

By the way i still havent recievedan email back from you   i need some programming on my new hmi and my radio updated

GTPprix Senior Enthusiast

GTPprix

Posted
Posted
By the way i still havent recievedan email back from you   i need some programming on my new hmi and my radio updated

We’ve been closed for awhile. You can email right now if you’d like.
Viktorrocks15 Enthusiast

Viktorrocks15

Posted
Posted

For those of you who are interested on adding the HUD functionality to your Silverado or Sierra it will soon become possible.

 

I’ve been working close on the parts fitment/modifications needed with another member from the forum. Here’s a few pictures. I have my Denali cluster coming soon from WAMS and once it arrives I’ll put everything together.

 

Thanks to[mention=159655]pgamboa[/mention] on harness, and whiteautoandmedia.com for programming my Denali cluster. Here’s a few pictures..

f130212921ad96de6c2e9f35df3ebfbc.jpg

2d0474733c8f0fc298a817f78923a990.jpg54816f2b3734c9b0b137e77d5950dd7e.jpgc4859cc036baaa3f347debc3249d10b1.jpg

 

Stay tune for more pictures..[emoji51]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Sierra1969 Enthusiast

Sierra1969

Posted
Posted

I just had my Denali cluster programmed by WAMs. It works great! I’m following this because I want the HUD also. HUD upgrade was part of the programming, so that part is done. 

   I have the Collision alert, so there is already a projector in the dash. Will I be able to tap into that?

  Thanks for any help. 

BlkSS Enthusiast

BlkSS

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Sierra1969 said:

I just had my Denali cluster programmed by WAMs. It works great! I’m following this because I want the HUD also. HUD upgrade was part of the programming, so that part is done. 

   I have the Collision alert, so there is already a projector in the dash. Will I be able to tap into that?

  Thanks for any help. 

The Driver Alert module is different than the HUD module.  The HUD will replace the Driver Alert module.

migizi Enthusiast

migizi

Posted
Posted
On 9/13/2016 at 2:08 PM, GTPprix said:

 

 

Correct. The only caveat to this would be if you wanted to swap over the rest of the MOST bus to 2016 spec and pay more for programming to make everything work. IE for 2016 the Tahoe that would have that cluster would have lane keep assist not lane departure warning. To make all of that type of stuff work backwards is a considerable amount of work and a little bit short of a nightmare. Best to either go all in and change it all or keep everything the same model year.

 

 

I may wet myself....

 

2015 Suburban LTZ with Lane Departure Warning...

Toying with the idea of adding the HUD - but on the fence,...

 

when I read the above, it made me wonder - if I purchased all the necessary hardware for the HUD upgrade, and send the cluster in for programming, would you be able to upgrade my lane departure warning to lane keep assist?

 

 

 

GTPprix Senior Enthusiast

GTPprix

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 10/11/2018 at 3:59 PM, migizi said:

 

 

I may wet myself....

 

2015 Suburban LTZ with Lane Departure Warning...

Toying with the idea of adding the HUD - but on the fence,...

 

when I read the above, it made me wonder - if I purchased all the necessary hardware for the HUD upgrade, and send the cluster in for programming, would you be able to upgrade my lane departure warning to lane keep assist?

 

 

No sorry. 

Edited by GTPprix
Misread this.
cmatt Enthusiast

cmatt

Posted
Posted
 
 
I may wet myself....
 
2015 Suburban LTZ with Lane Departure Warning...
Toying with the idea of adding the HUD - but on the fence,...
 
when I read the above, it made me wonder - if I purchased all the necessary hardware for the HUD upgrade, and send the cluster in for programming, would you be able to upgrade my lane departure warning to lane keep assist?
 
 
 


What’s the difference between lane departure warning and lane keep assist? What other hardware is needed for lane keep assist?
GTPprix Senior Enthusiast

GTPprix

Posted
Posted

I totally misread this. I thought he was asking about a hud retrofit with lane departure. Lane keep assist requires a bunch of different hardware including a different steering rack LOL 

Baldhills Enthusiast

Baldhills

Posted
Posted
Correct.  The speed limit icon is not available on 2014/2015 models.  It was added around 2016 with the 2.5 HMI module.

The speed limit icon showed up on my 2015 Sierra with the 2.0 HMI.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
cmatt Enthusiast

cmatt

Posted
Posted
I totally misread this. I thought he was asking about a hud retrofit with lane departure. Lane keep assist requires a bunch of different hardware including a different steering rack LOL 


Lol I thought that was the case. Converting to lane keep assist isn’t necessary for things to work correctly with a 2016 cluster, radio and 2.5 HMI in a 2015 is it?
GTPprix Senior Enthusiast

GTPprix

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, cmatt said:

 


Lol I thought that was the case. Converting to lane keep assist isn’t necessary for things to work correctly with a 2016 cluster, radio and 2.5 HMI in a 2015 is it?

 

No sir! just have to make sure everything is on the same bus revision etc. We'd really like to program all of it to keep everything kosher. 

Edited by GTPprix

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...