Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Keep column shift. Offer push button start as an option.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

+1 For Column Shift and proximity key

 

I love that GM is has stuck with the column shift even on its high end Trucks, both Ram and Ford assume as soon as you want a premium truck you must want a console shift like a luxury car, but as others have mentioned even in Luxo trim guys still do actual work with these things and the column shift is the most efficient for keeping maximum console space while still having the positive feel/feedback of changing gears compared to Rams rotary dial.

 

I wouldn't mind seeing the proximity entry especially now that the tailgate lock is tied in with the door locks, several times I have come up to the back of the truck carrying something heavy and it would be very nice to just grab the handle and have the tailgate unlock rather then trying to fish the keys out of a jacket pocket

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

KEEP THE COLUMN SHIFTER!!! It opens up a lot of space in the console. I wish my wife's enclave had a column shifter. I love driving her car but have no place to put my phone, coffee cup and glasses, not to mention any bolts or misc junk i am taking to Home Depot to match up. Column shifters look cool, column shifters are more practical. My friends that have F150's with consoles have no room. It looks like my wife's Enclave.

 

 

 

I have had a push button BMW, Keyed E39 BMW, and my entire family (Parents etc) have the new Altimas with proximity keys. I rather keep my laser cut key system. Let me explain why the new Altima key system sucks. My dad and mom drove my wife and i home from dinner one night. Got to the house, my mom and my wife went inside, my dad and I drove back out to the store. When we parked, we realized the key was in my mom's purse...... 5 miles back home. So one of us stayed in the car with it idling while the other went in and did the shopping. So hip and cool, they should make a commercial about it (Sarcasm). My E90 BMW had push button start and a key fob that needed to be inserted into the dash. I was OK with that, something had to be inserted into the car. But these keys that are completely wireless.... that's trendy BS for hipster commercials.

Edited by FL335i
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Column shifter but push button start with the proximity sensor to unlock doors and tailgate should be an option. My wife has push button and I hate having to pull out the key chain for my truck when all I have to do for her car is grab the handle.

Posted

My family owned GM vehicles for decades for one reason "Column shifter" :D

 

we currently own 2 (2015/2016) ESV Escalades and 2016 Silverado HC

 

so after trying both features my vote goes to:

column shifter + push start button + keyless entry + bird view camera

  • Like 1
Posted

Keep the column shifter!

Posted

I'm torn myself on the shifter. It will definitely have the keyless entry and push button start. Just look at every other GM car and SUV coming out. They all have push button start. Had it on my Cruze and loved it.

Posted

:chevrolet: Column shift and key for me! Tried and true! Mopar has a history of push button drive nothing new there.

Posted (edited)

First car with a console shift was a '65 Impala SS, basically a six passenger vehicle wide enough for 3 in the front in the base Impala but the sporty two door with console and vinyl buckets were a chick magnet.....the flip down buckets and a wider console gave quick easy access to the roomy rear without opening a door!

 

Today's narrower "full size" cars (not to mention the even narrower mid/compact/subs) don't have enough space for 3 to fit comfortably in the front.....so they are forced to put a floor console to accommodate adults in the 2-1/2 wide width cars. But the Silverado/Sierra class is the width of the 60s full size, the 40/20/40 is essentially 2 buckets with a fold down console with floor space to accommodate 3 in the front so why bother with a console and lose a potential seat?

Edited by Thomcat
Posted

Column shift, key, and retro wipers, cruse, turn signal on the column. I hate all the controls on the steering wheel.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I vote keyed ignition and a column shifter.

 

This is a no brainer to me. Trucks are about functionality. A column shifter is more functional as it frees up so much centre console space, plus it's likely cheaper to build. Also, I like to rest my hand on the shifter to adjust the radio while I'm driving.

As for the key versus the push to start...I personally couldn't care less for push to start. I've had it in a couple of cars and it's honestly pointless. One time I dropped my wife off and she left the vehicle with the fob in her pocket. 30 seconds down the road the car started alerting me that the key had left the vehicle. Great "convenience" feature that made me have to turn around to go get the fob. I'd rather have a mechanical system that works along side a digital security feature. Add an immobilizer along with the key and that's fine with me.

  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)

I spent the better part of 2 days driving a Dodge Rebel. In addition to not being too thrilled about the knob for a shifter, the cruise control button set up leaves a lot to be desired as well.

Edited by revrnd
  • 5 months later...
Posted
On 12/28/2016 at 10:00 AM, FL335i said:

K

 

 

I have had a push button BMW, Keyed E39 BMW, and my entire family (Parents etc) have the new Altimas with proximity keys. I rather keep my laser cut key system. Let me explain why the new Altima key system sucks. My dad and mom drove my wife and i home from dinner one night. Got to the house, my mom and my wife went inside, my dad and I drove back out to the store. When we parked, we realized the key was in my mom's purse...... 5 miles back home. So one of us stayed in the car with it idling while the other went in and did the shopping. So hip and cool, they should make a commercial about it (Sarcasm). My E90 BMW had push button start and a key fob that needed to be inserted into the dash. I was OK with that, something had to be inserted into the car. But these keys that are completely wireless.... that's trendy BS for hipster commercials.

We had a similar adventure where the vehicle was driven away without the phone.

 

We also know of a fire started when the car was left running in the garage and the fob with the house key attached taken inside. 

 

I do like the way proximity detection works for unlock but am quite happen with my keys and the fob handing from the ignition.

 

Guess that makes me a vote for key + proximity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...