Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My condenser failed earlier this week. Well, it's been cool, so that is when I noticed it. 2014 with 48,000 miles. I called my regular dealer and was quoted $1,300-$1,500 to fix. No help offered from GM for my VIN number. Has anyone contacted a GM Customer Care group for help in the cost? I could replace it myself I imagine, but I'd rather have a pro do it.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

funny i came across this.. .2016 gmc...85k... ac was leaking.. hot air.. fixed 2 leaks, and was told to keep an eye on the condenser.. ..well 1 week later hat just went out.. back to blowing warm~.. FML... 1200 fix~..

Edited by Crstfr
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/12/2021 at 2:41 PM, Crstfr said:

funny i came across this.. .2016 gmc...85k... ac was leaking.. hot air.. fixed 2 leaks, and was told to keep an eye on the condenser.. ..well 1 week later hat just went out.. back to blowing warm~.. FML... 1200 fix~..

Damm thats some luck. Hope ya get it sorted out

 

Yotaman

Posted
14 hours ago, Yotaman said:

Damm thats some luck. Hope ya get it sorted out

 

Yotaman

A friend of mine with a 2014 Silverado LT had his condenser go out.
Fortunately, it wasn't the evaporator.
He replaced it, with help, but didn't get the trans fluid line in properly.
The condenser install went well, a shop replaced the lost trans fluid, fixed the connection, and recharged the AC system.
It's been good for the last three months since the replacement.

Posted

Just made an appointment to get my AC fixed (2015 Sierra). AC went at 115K KM, I now have 127K KM. Assuming it's the condenser; is there a part number I should request to ensure I get the 're-engineered' condenser? Alternatively, any aftermarket condensers that are much better quality? I don't want this to happen again. Thanks guys.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

When will the cash cow for the dealers ever end? 2014 Sierra with 78K miles - I have had to take my truck in to have the A/C fixed every year for the 3 years for the same issue. Is there not class action lawsuit I can join from California? First it was the faulty AC condenser - that was covered in 2015 trucks, not 2014. Then the pin hole in one of the lines an another $700.  A year later blowing hot air again - took it in and it was the same line they replace year before. Fortunately it was still covered under warranty. This year - blowing hot air again - take it in and they want to charge me to troubleshoot? Really? I complained and got that waived - only this time it is a rear discharge hose that was leaking.  They put dye in it and did see some traces on the firewall near the hose they replaced 2x already and changed it for no charge - another $650. In the last 3 years it has cost me almost $1000 a year for my AC. They could have completely serviced the system the first time for less!

 

Any resources in CA that can help?

 

Looking to trade it in and be done with it, while I stall can and the AC works.

 

Does anyone  know if the same issues have plagued the 2020's and above??

 

First thing they ask me is if I have the extended warranty - but does that not stop after 5 yrs?

 

Sorry to ramble - just need to vent.

 

I do not seeing myself as Dodge or Ford man - I have owned a Toyota Tacoma, but love my GMC trucks.

 

Help in CA.

 

JJ

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Full disclosure - I did not read every comment in this almost 40-page thread so I apologize in advance but I'm on break at work right now and don't have that much time.  I did read the first page or so and then the last couple.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I gather is:  

 

  • There was a design flaw in the a/c condenser that causes it to develop a leak
  • GM acknowledges that it's a flaw but doesn't replace it for free
  • It can cost up to $1400 at a dealer to get it replaced
  • Some have replaced it themselves but it's a 3-4 hour job (and a person likely needs some certain tools/equipment to properly install and charge it)

 

Did I miss anything?  

 

'15 LT CC Z71 here, 55,600 miles, a/c just stopped cooling properly...does this mean I likely have fallen victim to this, as well?  

 

What's the suggested course of action?  Dealer repair and try to get them to cover the cost? (Tips for this?? Any TSBs or whatever to tell them so they can help cover it?)  Or better to just buy the part and have a local private garage do the install for less than the dealership?  If this, what's the p/n of the updated version that remedies the issue from happening again?  

 

Thanks in advance!  I'm confident several of you in this thread have great knowledge to impart to me on this issue based on your own experience so I'm all ears (well, eyes...).  

Edited by 03msc
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

OK, well I'll follow-up on this.  Took it to the dealership this past Friday and it was, surprise, the condenser.  I went ahead and let them replace it.  A chunk of change I didn't want to pay but it is what it is.  He quoted me $1,180 but the final bill was $1,160.  With the way things go for me, I figured if I ordered the part myself and tried to put it on myself, it'd either arrive bent and be a long replacement process or I'd break something else in the process.  So, $1,162 poorer but I have ice cold a/c again.  Oh well.  

 

GM should really reimburse the costs or part of the costs for these...

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm having ac issues at 63k on a 2016.

Was 8 oz low on fluid( dye added- no leak) this was a week ago now yesterday seamed not very good ac again)

Between my transmission and a slew of other issues I'm tired of my " great trade in swap" I thought I did with my 2007 and want it backatleast the damn air worked and it shifted fine.

I'm really disappointed "again " with my ltz-z71 piece of garbage.

Never again...40k bucket of problems

 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Succumbed to the condenser problem myself. 2015 with 72k miles.

 

What brand is everyone DIY'ing this with? Murray from orielly, spectra from autozone, oem dealer and risk it failing again?

Posted

Just did this job on a '16 Sierra. GM can't seem to get ANYTHING right these days. Can't say I'm surprised. I'm still dealing with low bidder junk parts on my '07 Silverado 1500 at 113k miles. Tranny failed at 103k. Rear end at 97k. The clunk that has been there since day 7 has become progressively louder over the years. Something tells me the source is about to reveal itself any day now ... :mad:

 

But back on topic ...

 

Customer wanted cheap, since this thing has been a money pit for him since the day he bought it (Gee, sounds familiar ... shocker!) - he traded it for a Ford (Not that they're any better). Used UAC brand from RockAuto. My opinion? STEER CLEAR! Chinese garbage! Took A LOT of bending and tweaking to get the piece of crap to fit right. I wasn't too happy during this install! 

 

Thankfully the job is done, A/C is ice cold, and this headache has moved on to someone else (Unfortunately for them).

 

The 21st Century automotive industry for ya.

 

spacer.png

 

2545-E202-713-C-4-DBB-8122-4-F5-B68-D5-C
 

 


 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Add me, 2016 Serria Denali 60k no ac, but I moved from Maryland to South Carolina and didnt have the time to get it fixed and we made a few trips now have 67k. I bought used at 53k, had the trans flushed and updated at 54k. I'm thinking the dealer patched the Ac to get by. I've been adding refrigerant to get by. Like everyone says, Gm should be 100% responsible, I'm a Hvac tech and refrigerant leaks are a no no period, that's from the EPA. I guess that GM in Government Motors of China now that a known leak is ok and requires no attention, that's BS, because if I have a known leak on a system and I'm caught I'm fined. Well any way, this is crazy. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

How many has had this fixed under warranty or used the updated part from GM and it has failed again ? Mine is still good but I am afraid the aluminum foil is not really gonna keep it from cracking again.

 

Yotaman

Posted

In my opinion, I'd rather fix it myself than have GM fix it for free using the same crap parts the vehicle came with. That, and the way they're screwing their techs today encourages speed over a quality job.

Posted

One day last month, my wife pulled into the garage from running some errands in her 2016 Tahoe, and mentioned that the AC wasn't cooling. I shined a light through the grill, and could see the oil spot on the condenser where they all fail. The local Chevrolet dealer estimated that it would cost between $1500-1600 for the repair, and the GMC dealer wouldn't give me an estimate.

 

The Tahoe had the extended coverage on the condenser, but it expired in July. I called GM and they said I'd have to take it to a dealer to have it diagnosed before they could talk about giving me some help on the repair.

 

I decided to have an independent shop I trust do the repair, and it cost me $1013. It would have been nice to know beforehand what GM would have done for me on the repair, but I decided to go the independent shop route to avoid what might have turned into a prolonged ordeal.

 

I have the same condenser on my 2015 Sierra, and if (when) it fails, I think I'm going to attempt to replace it myself. I'm fairly comfortable with replacing the condenser, but not so much with charging the system. I've watched quite a few videos, but still have a a few questions. But I'm also not comfortable paying another grand for the repair, so it might be time to learn.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...