Jump to content

GMC vs Chevy


Recommended Posts

Posted

The Silverado and Sierra are built on the same assembly line by the same workers, have same mechanical parts, engine trans, suspension etc. The only difference is body panels and trim. The idea the the GMC is better quality than the Silverado is nonsense.

 

I could only like this comment once.

 

GMC exists solely as a marketing ploy to get more money out of your pocket. Even the Denali has most of the same parts as my Silverado, with the addition of some more expensive shocks and a lot of chrome dipped plastic.

 

The only real difference is cosmetic. If driving a vehicle with more chrome on it makes you feel better about yourself, more power to you.

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

As for the op, GMC is the more upscale. That's why it has the Denali and no Chevy equivalent.

I thought the High County was the equivalent? I know for sure it's the step above LTZ anyways.

Posted

 

I could only like this comment once.

 

GMC exists solely as a marketing ploy to get more money out of your pocket. Even the Denali has most of the same parts as my Silverado, with the addition of some more expensive shocks and a lot of chrome dipped plastic.

 

The only real difference is cosmetic. If driving a vehicle with more chrome on it makes you feel better about yourself, more power to you.

I agree,they do market it more up scale. But I work with people like you that say"Oh you drive a professional grade truck". That drives me nuts,I bought it cause it was a good deal. Did not matter to me that it was a GMC. Not because I feel better about my self.
Posted

The differences are minor but they do exist. Denali gets the LCD gauge screen, High Country is standard analog, Denali has 4 way power lumbar, High Country is 2 way, etc.

Posted

I liked my 2000 Silverado and when looking for a replacement in 2009 I found a Sierra with the options that I wanted. The same happened in 2015. It is all marketing. I'd rather have a High Country than a SLT but I'd choose a Denali over a HC. I generally gravitate to the mid-level trims and find better choices with the SLE when compared to the LT's.

Posted

It's all marketing in my opinion. There are a few niceties that are intentionally made available only on the Sierra (e.g. slightly nicer trim, Magnetic Ride Control, etc.) which kinda justify its existence. For that matter, perhaps the very existence of the entire GMC Division. GM could easily make these features available on the Chevy version of the truck, but they choose not to. Otherwise, why would one consider a more expensive vehicle that is essentially identical to its less expensive counterpart?

 

I was quite happy with my Silverado for many years, however, it was only after I got my Sierra Denali that I truly realized how very special I really am. ;-)

Posted

My father was always a Chevy truck guy...I always imagined I'd have a Chevy truck.....until I got in a GMC for the first time. Chevy who?

Posted

To be totally honest, the euro looking taillights on the GMC Denali killed that truck for me. All the upscale on the interior is cheapened by those tail lights.

Posted

Not a fan of the red lights GMC has on the dash, looks cheap imo

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2017 and 2018 are blue.

Posted

 

I could only like this comment once.

 

GMC exists solely as a marketing ploy to get more money out of your pocket. Even the Denali has most of the same parts as my Silverado, with the addition of some more expensive shocks and a lot of chrome dipped plastic.

 

The only real difference is cosmetic. If driving a vehicle with more chrome on it makes you feel better about yourself, more power to you.

That's it! It's the chrome dipped plastic that makes it Professional Grade. I knew it had to be somthin!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...