Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2017 Silverado and assuming the newest Silverado has the Capless Fuel cap / Fuel Filler. I see that driving through dusty environments, wet & snowy weather the fuel door does not seal against outside environments things can accumulate on the capless fuel filler. I figures out that the outside cap dimension is 6cm = 2.36" wide. I could use a trailer bearing cap with is the same width or just slightly larger or a rubber bearing buddy cap that is 2.44" = 6.20cm wide which both fits right over with the metal trailer bearing cap being a bit more snug. Check out the photo's below. To buy them I just went to the local RV / trailer supply place. Hope this will help anybody looking for a cost affective way to keep sh*t off of the capless fuel filler.

20180114_111104.jpg

20180114_111139.jpg

20180114_111231.jpg

20180114_111546.jpg

20180118_212328.jpg

20180118_212343.jpg

20180118_212502.jpg

20180120_110328.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

GM now offers a filler ‘cover’.. there’s a recent thread here about it. I picked one up on eBay for $15
b71380e2701bcb6d925b9fa4313d7710.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I didn't know that I live in lower mainland British Columbia so am not sure if they sell that up here but will check at the dealer if they do, or as suggested on eBay. It looks like it's lockable too I see. Thanks for letting me know!

Edited by Joe's 2017 Silverado
Posted

Why did they go to capless? Is the concept of a gas cap just too much for some people to handle? Not like anyone is doing NASCAR splash and gos at the local Sinclair station. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)

nothing wrong with capless, I have a issue with how the door on the Silverado doesnt seal. Look at other GM products, looks like all the other doors actually seal

Everytime I wash my truck I get a small amount of water laying in the trap door. Not enough to really hurt anything but it goes into the tank when filling

Yes I can wipe it out with a rag if it bothered me but its the point. If water lays there and goes into the fuel system so does dirt,dust etc

Edited by Orlando8
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I have had my 17 for 10 months now and have yet to find any dirt or water on the trap door or even close to the filler neck.  Have driven through pouring rain, snow, dirt and mud.  Have went through automatic car washes and hand washes.  Never had any water intrusion.  Not sure why some are having problems with this and others aren't.  Wonder if you could put thin weather stripping around the door.

Edited by 2017_whitez71
  • Like 1
Posted

I used a laundry detergent cap, cut it down a little. It won’t scratch the paint on the truck, won’t rust, didn’t cost anything and if I loose it no big deal. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Loco-diablo said:

GM now offers a filler ‘cover’.. there’s a recent thread here about it. I picked one up on eBay for $15
b71380e2701bcb6d925b9fa4313d7710.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now you'll have to find a cap for the key slot to keep it clear of dirt, water, etc.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 4
Posted
Now you'll have to find a cap for the key slot to keep it clear of dirt, water, etc.

I’ve had locking caps with a similar key slot design. If the lock starts giving me trouble, I’ll toss it. They really didn’t need to put a lock on it. Bad idea.
Posted

Thanks for all the replys guys, some great and cost affective cover ideas too. Unfortunately I had to put a cover of some kind because here in BC we get lots of rain and I get a little bit of water on the capless and I figure when I fill up and shove the fuel nosel in it would push that little bit of water and any contaminants down with it. I do get a bit of dust too when I drive on dirt dusty roads. I know its probably nothing to worry about since it so little but I rather have a cover of some kind to keep debris out anyways. True what some say why they can't just use a conventional gas cap or seal the door as well like I see on some car models if they were going to use capless. 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a 2017 Silverado Z71. I found that the cap from a can of Krylon paint fits perfectly  and just a little snug

on the capless fuel filler,  and its FREE.  When looking for a spray can cap, be sure it fits inside of the rim of the can ,

some caps fit over the rim and will be too loose

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I wouldn't worry about a bit of water at all, the system uses two trap doors actually, after the first(outer) one there is a compartment with a drain hole at the bottom, then another trap door that actually goes to the tank. That is why GM includes the little funnel with the trucks, to get past the second trap door, and trust me, it's needed for adding fuel de-icer or additives to the tank, and not the ground below the truck.

  • Like 1
Posted

Went out and checked under the truck for the drain hole and there is a drain, but it has a quarter inch hose connected 

to it, that goes back to the tank. I still think a slip over cap is the way to go.

 Don't know if its true, but the dealer said it has the smaller second trap door to keep dummies from filling the tank with diesel !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...