Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

.. just in case you thought this was just a GM problem.. nope, appears to be a sliding window with defrost problem.. seems like a pretty common failure on F150 as well (maybe more common)..

 

http://www.carproblemzoo.com/ford/f-150/rear-window-defogger-problems.php

 

...WOW nearly 130 documented F150 cases here

https://www.glassbytes.com/2013/12/several-ford-f-150-owners-report-shattering-back-lites-to-nhtsa/

 

.. link to file complaints for Canadian owners

https://wwwapps.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/7/PCDB-BDPP/fc-cp.aspx?lang=eng

 

.. also found this interesting GM bulletin..

https://gm.oemdtc.com/1974/14815-heated-back-window-glass-structurally-weakened-due-to-surface-flaw-2015-chevrolet-silverado-gmc-sierra

Edited by STRMTRPR
added link
Posted (edited)

Pulled the square 30A # 10 fuse from the under hood fuse box. 

 

The rear defroster button still lights up on remote start but rear window is cold ?  to touch. ?

Edited by 2009GMC
Posted
37 minutes ago, 2009GMC said:

Pulled the square 30A # 10 fuse from the under hood fuse box. 

 

The rear defroster button still lights up on remote start but rear window is cold ?  to touch. ?

I’ve been think of pulling the fuse or relay also. Do the heated mirrors still work when the button is pushed?

Posted (edited)

.. so I was thinking about this window problem as a short resulting in an increase in current flow..and the possibility of introducing some form of current limiting/monitoring to prevent overheating/melting/smoking

..BUT.. I haven't seen any reports of the fuse blowing - this is at its simplest the weak link in the circuit and basic overcurrent protection.. so why didn't it blow? let's assume the current flow never reached the 30A threshold at the time of failure.. what is the current draw under normal operation? I measured the current flow of my rear defog circuit today; and for the purpose of simplifying the hypothesis here it I'll round it off to: 18A at cold startup of 0C or 32F. Let's also assume that the circuit voltage is always constant.

..so if we are correct that the current draw never reached the peak 30A rating of the fuse where did all the heat/smoke come from? .. now this is going way back to my days in school but it then only makes sense that condition responsible is resistive heating (l2R).. increased resistance from poor contact of the middle sliding window.. think toaster oven, space heater etc.. this phenomenon causes thermal expansion and can literally melt wires.

 

.. Circuit design theory is not my area of expertise.. my background is Robotics.. so I'm hoping for members with expertise to chime in with thoughts.

 

.. If the window is indeed experiencing resistive heating from a high resistance connection due to poor/short sighted design what can be done as a preventive failsafe?.. add a cycling thermostat or thermal fuse like used in a clothes dryer?.. would be a rather ugly preventive measure to what is likely a design flaw with the window connection.. and seems unlikely that GM would step up and go the design route given what also seems to be a known problem with the Ford window design (same glass supplier??)

 

 

Edited by STRMTRPR
.. thoughts on dryer fuse
Posted
On 3/15/2019 at 5:19 PM, Blue5.3l said:

I’ve been think of pulling the fuse or relay also. Do the heated mirrors still work when the button is pushed?

Yes I verified this morning that my mirrors were warm and my rear window was cold since I pulled the fuse.

Posted
On 3/15/2019 at 8:19 PM, Blue5.3l said:

I’ve been think of pulling the fuse or relay also. Do the heated mirrors still work when the button is pushed?

Yes, just pull the fuse only. The relay controls both the mirrors and the rear defogger. 

Posted
.. so I was thinking about this window problem as a short resulting in an increase in current flow..and the possibility of introducing some form of current limiting/monitoring to prevent overheating/melting/smoking
..BUT.. I haven't seen any reports of the fuse blowing - this is at its simplest the weak link in the circuit and basic overcurrent protection.. so why didn't it blow? let's assume the current flow never reached the 30A threshold at the time of failure.. what is the current draw under normal operation? I measured the current flow of my rear defog circuit today; and for the purpose of simplifying the hypothesis here it I'll round it off to: 18A at cold startup of 0C or 32F. Let's also assume that the circuit voltage is always constant.
..so if we are correct that the current draw never reached the peak 30A rating of the fuse where did all the heat/smoke come from? .. now this is going way back to my days in school but it then only makes sense that condition responsible is resistive heating (l2R).. increased resistance from poor contact of the middle sliding window.. think toaster oven, space heater etc.. this phenomenon causes thermal expansion and can literally melt wires.
 
.. Circuit design theory is not my area of expertise.. my background is Robotics.. so I'm hoping for members with expertise to chime in with thoughts.
 
.. If the window is indeed experiencing resistive heating from a high resistance connection due to poor/short sighted design what can be done as a preventive failsafe?.. add a cycling thermostat or thermal fuse like used in a clothes dryer?.. would be a rather ugly preventive measure to what is likely a design flaw with the window connection.. and seems unlikely that GM would step up and go the design route given what also seems to be a known problem with the Ford window design (same glass supplier??)
 
 
This kid is on to something. Many key works in there are spot on.
When and where the load is the highest is where you will have the hottest spot. And where the failure will occur. What can be done to reduce this and when what is the best amp rating of the circuit? Like all things the draw can be high then reduced after a second or so, think hid lights running super low amps but to start we have seen a need for up to 30amp fuses. So the difficulty is how do you protect that circuit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I finally got my window repaired by the dealer at no cost.  They claimed GM had not found the cause of the wiring fire and window shattering but had another truck with the same issue where the window didn't break and they have sent the window away for analysis. Being a curious electrical engineer I believe the problem could be either a sticking defogger relay that I assume is supposed to cycle the current to the defogger, or a programming glitch in the computer that controls the relay. I tested the relay on the bench but it did not stick with multiple operations. I have disabled the automatic window defog on remote start (since I think that is a possible source for a programming problem). Hopefully GM figures it out soon and refunds the money that people have paid out to fix the damage on their own.!

Posted
On 3/20/2019 at 9:13 AM, 1SLOW1500 said:

This kid is on to something. Many key works in there are spot on.
When and where the load is the highest is where you will have the hottest spot. And where the failure will occur. What can be done to reduce this and when what is the best amp rating of the circuit? Like all things the draw can be high then reduced after a second or so, think hid lights running super low amps but to start we have seen a need for up to 30amp fuses. So the difficulty is how do you protect that circuit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

You obviously know a solution, but won't post it.  Can you message or email it to someone?  You don't have to include technical GM bulletin info, just "install smaller fuse" or "electrical grease on contacts" or similar will work.  

Posted
On ‎3‎/‎26‎/‎2019 at 11:51 AM, Szilla said:

You obviously know a solution, but won't post it.  Can you message or email it to someone?  You don't have to include technical GM bulletin info, just "install smaller fuse" or "electrical grease on contacts" or similar will work.  

My opinion is that it is a programming glitch that keeps the relay on too long in certain situations, can't protect against that with a fuse. GM would have to fix that and issue a recall. A poor design in my opinion when a fuse can't be applied properly to prevent a fire.... 

Posted
My opinion is that it is a programming glitch that keeps the relay on too long in certain situations, can't protect against that with a fuse. GM would have to fix that and issue a recall. A poor design in my opinion when a fuse can't be applied properly to prevent a fire.... 
Fuse cant help and the same circuit runs the mirror heaters. And saying it keeps it on too long in certain situations means the bcm would have to read another senor be it a temp or baro. Dont see that major software or hardware update being made.
Keep the window contact clean and electric grease then keep your eye on it.
There are other things you can do but on this forum everyone is going to scream for gm to do it. When they don't they will just post something should have been done. And true but I see it as a waste for most people here.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
3 minutes ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

Fuse cant help and the same circuit runs the mirror heaters. And saying it keeps it on too long in certain situations means the bcm would have to read another senor be it a temp or baro. Dont see that major software or hardware update being made.
Keep the window contact clean and electric grease then keep your eye on it.
There are other things you can do but on this forum everyone is going to scream for gm to do it. When they don't they will just post something should have been done. And true but I see it as a waste for most people here.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

2015 Cadillacs were recalled for the same thing but of course all they did was disable the auto defrost mode. I am sure the relay doesn't cycle based on a sensor but it just set to a timer. Greasing a connection inside the truck isn't going to do much, there is no extra corrosion there to make a hot spot worse. The connection obviously isn't designed properly for the service. The more people complain to GM and NHTSA then the more likelihood something will get done before a baby in a rear car seat is hurt or killed by this defect. Not a waste for most people searching for this problem. Manufacturers need to fix their design defects not worry about goddamn lawyers and insurance. They will just keep ignoring if people don't know where to complain.

  • Like 1
Posted

Another design issue that I see is that GM is trying to protect 3 separate defroster grids on the sliding rear window with one fuse and wire connection to the fuse panel instead of using 3 separate wires with smaller fuses. Might have been a cost cutting measure but violates a basic design rule in my opinion.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just happened to my truck this morning.  GM services entered my info and said they cannot do anything to help unless there is a bulletin on the problem.  They told me I am at the mercy of the Dealer, dealer fees, and the dealers service manager.  Very disappointing.  I've told everyone I know that owns a newer Silverado to NOT use the rear defrost!! 

 

image.thumb.png.44dfd3253be495decc50ee0f06fbd100.pngimage.thumb.png.48753899c80681fd667b8e878a872a66.pngimage.png.f2d0c83e44d892f88dda826136fdd319.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 298 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...