Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Today?  Drove it like I stole it because gas is like $1.  Hammer down! 

Edited by Leevon
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Just cleaned the interior, gonna wait till the weekend to wash and wax.  Also realized that I'm still on the same tank of gas from last week.  

Posted

Got my filthy motorsports OEM kit w/ deaver leaf springs put on today. Will have a thread up after I put some miles on it!
 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
56 minutes ago, TheTicketTX said:

Got my filthy motorsports OEM kit w/ deaver leaf springs put on today. Will have a thread up after I put some miles on it!
 

 

Awesome! Can’t wait to hear more about it. 

Posted
2 hours ago, TheTicketTX said:

Got my filthy motorsports OEM kit w/ deaver leaf springs put on today. Will have a thread up after I put some miles on it!
 

 

Nice ? congrats.

Posted
36 minutes ago, ryan030389 said:

09804ecd9c1c14070bb2479f57e6c926.jpg
d5e5154e9983be44ff5e567e55282701.jpg
75a5def1ea7ef72df3078dd1c71bb769.jpg
710796e2a6296beb3a3d5dea4c457b55.jpg

More cleaning! Washed and waxed the wheels lol emoji2373.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What break calipers are those?

Posted
16 hours ago, TheTicketTX said:

Got my filthy motorsports OEM kit w/ deaver leaf springs put on today. Will have a thread up after I put some miles on it!
 

 

What shop in DFW did your install?

Posted
2 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

Cool.  I was gonna guess Custom Trucks Unlimited in Grapevine.

If I had gone with a BDS coil over setup, I would of definitely gone to them. They are a licensed dealer and installer for BDS, and I've heard nothing but good things... (at least their Grapevine location).

Posted
Just now, TheTicketTX said:

If I had gone with a BDS coil over setup, I would of definitely gone to them. They are a licensed dealer and installer for BDS, and I've heard nothing but good things... (at least their Grapevine location).

Yep, they are good folks.  They installed the 6.5" lift on my 2017.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...