Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys I know I’m in the wrong post for this. I have a 2019 custom trail boss with the AFM. Anyone know if the range AFM Disabler or any tuners can disable the AFM for the 2019 trail boss custom 5.3 6 speed? I looked  at the pages and called tuners and no one can do it. Any suggestions?

Posted
42 minutes ago, Minarets said:

This looks awesome. What wheels are those? And is that grill wrapped?

 

Oh I know see the badge on the hood. That’s the carbon pro grille?

SmartSelect_20191016-214907_Gallery.thumb.jpg.f1024e0dfd46a7da8615f4b4a8348abe.jpg

Posted

2019 Sierra Elevation.

Leveling kit and 275/65/R20 tires.

This truck total dwarfs my old 2007 Silverado.

0CE62AB1-711A-4BE8-9A05-D0F8EFA9F114.jpeg

2845C82F-12D7-45CE-8595-6A1DF1A89885.jpeg

  • Like 5
Posted

 new to this forum, but this is what I did to the front of my custom trail boss.   wanted to light it up since I bought it. 

LED headlights are coming any day now.


20191015_210702.thumb.jpg.f50df1f9c8bcbdc6056312bfbc5b7175.jpg

  • Like 6
Posted
45 minutes ago, chevy 95 said:

 new to this forum, but this is what I did to the front of my custom trail boss.   wanted to light it up since I bought it. 

LED headlights are coming any day now.


20191015_210702.thumb.jpg.f50df1f9c8bcbdc6056312bfbc5b7175.jpg

Looks really good lit up.  How did you light that up ?

Posted
12 minutes ago, jamin87ss said:

Luv it, thinking about removing the "sierra" as well

Thanks bud.  I go back and fourth with wanting to take the GMC OFF as well and just keep the AT4

Posted
On 10/15/2019 at 9:56 PM, Sirhc said:

SmartSelect_20191012-123743_Gallery.thumb.jpg.e62ba8e265f51fb92dc4f36432e49db8.jpgSmartSelect_20191015-215136_Gallery.thumb.jpg.4656c529fce19ff5bc0fe4141db9b63b.jpg

Are those Elevation wheels or did you paint/powder coat stock wheels? I can’t tell. 

 

That looks SO much better than the stock wheels

Posted
4 hours ago, madconcept said:

2019 Sierra Elevation.

Leveling kit and 275/65/R20 tires.

This truck total dwarfs my old 2007 Silverado.

0CE62AB1-711A-4BE8-9A05-D0F8EFA9F114.jpeg

2845C82F-12D7-45CE-8595-6A1DF1A89885.jpeg

I love the Elevations, I am torn between the Elevation and AT4.

Posted
1 hour ago, Denalion22 said:

Thanks bud.  I go back and fourth with wanting to take the GMC OFF as well and just keep the AT4

Also what i was pondering, i think the clean look would be slick,

Posted
On 10/23/2018 at 7:40 PM, Opiedeegs said:

c0525a3de646f7032a27bc1a3507d61e.jpg

I put a back rack and a toolbox on I’ll post more pictures tomorrow

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

How was your first year of ownership? I am ready to pull the plug on an AT4 but I keep reading brake and transmission horror stories.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...