Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just a poor design. I personally think if it was an easy fix they would have solved it for the 2020 model year. We’ll see about 2021 I guess.

Posted
On 10/28/2020 at 6:03 PM, OnTheReel said:

“Barely raining” is usually the worst for some reason.

Yes, this. Mine barely leaks when it rains hard. ??‍♂️

Posted

What was the final outcome of this issue.  I have a very very slight leak on the top drive side.  it pour last night and not enough to get everything wet but enough that there is moister in there.  what is the best fix and did it hold up.  2020 at4

Posted
1 hour ago, gmcAT4tumor said:

What was the final outcome of this issue.  I have a very very slight leak on the top drive side.  it pour last night and not enough to get everything wet but enough that there is moister in there.  what is the best fix and did it hold up.  2020 at4

tldr.... nothing yet but flex seal or sell.

Posted

I picked mine back up today.

New seal and spoiler bolts are on-order. ETA mid-week next week. (high demand, go figure)

There was another truck at the dealer with the same issue. 

 

If this recurs, or doesn't stop, I am pursuing the solid rear window option.

Posted
14 hours ago, WACKEM_G said:

Wonder if this happening in the new GMC Hummer?! emoji848.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's why they made it a convertable/t-tops, they expected it to get wet.

  • Haha 1
Posted
That's why they made it a convertable/t-tops, they expected it to get wet.

I’d be down for a convertible GM Truck! [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
12 minutes ago, WACKEM_G said:


I’d be down for a convertible GM Truck! emoji1787.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had a 76 blazer that was pretty much that, hah

Posted
I had a 76 blazer that was pretty much that, hah

Luved those Blazers! [emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I’d be down for a convertible GM Truck! [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SSR

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
On 10/20/2020 at 10:55 AM, Transient said:

Are you talking about the truck frame or the window frame? If the truck frame is cracked you'll have bigger problems than a leaking window.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Why would you think he's talking about a truck frame crack?

 

I'm fairly certain he was obvious with "a crack in the frame of the sliding window".

 

Maybe he should just replace the cam instead.??

Edited by polarys425
Posted

Update on the rubber cord idea. The gap is not consistent all the way across and the rubber cord is firmer than I expected. I haven’t had a chance to try and soften the rubber up to get it to fit all the way across. Maybe someone else has some ideas on a softer weather stripping/ cord to fit in the gap???

Posted
On 10/14/2020 at 7:40 PM, LSUAT4 said:

Add a 2020 AT4 with a build date of 8/20 to the list. Just got the truck back yesterday from having the valve springs replaced, now the rear window is leaking. I thought buying the 2020 I wouldn’t have these issues, haven’t even made a payment yet. Back to the dealership tomorrow!

9368C601-45D2-4233-92EE-D0A185947865.jpeg

Update got the window sealed and it turned out Sh.t, big blobs on both sides. Dealer tried to cut it out, made it worse. They are ordering a new rear window and having it replaced at Safelite, hopefully they  do a better job. Rear seats and head liner have to removed, so excited to have a brand new truck tore apart again!

455A1ECA-2896-43F6-9351-84949401ED0F.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm sure if you went to a junkyard where you go in and pull the part off the truck yourself, not a used part place where they do it for you, you can get that part on it's own.  Depending on if and what else you would be buying, and time of day, they might even just skip over adding it as a item to the bill.
    • No, we trade them like pokeman cards.
    • It would be sold as a "kit", lights + auth/programming code.   You can resell the code to someone else, if they just buy the lights, either new or used, and they can then use the code to get them to work on their truck.
    • Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...