Jump to content

2019 Silverado Power Folding Mirror upgrade

2019Custom
 Share

Recommended Posts

2019Custom Enthusiast

2019Custom

Posted
Posted

I have a 2019 Silverado custom. Beautiful truck but relatively bare bones. Wondering if anyone has had any luck finding a solution for upgrading to power folding mirrors which are only available on LTZ or High country models.

 

I've found some aftermarket ones for up to 2018 so maybe I just need to be patient?

589EE77C-2A60-4AB7-8F8B-175950EF38A8.jpeg

2019Custom Enthusiast

2019Custom

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Much appreciated. Contacted a few and all said it’ll likely be a few years since it’s a new model.

 

Found the following for $599 each on eBay (the seller has a right and a left):

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2019-CHEVY-SILVERADO-GMC-SIERRA-MIRROR-POWER-FOLD-BLIND-SPOT-CAMERA-2-LEFT-/273743171851

 

And then the door panel control piece on Napa:

https://www.napaonline.com/en/p/ECHPA3960

 

but I’m concerned that since I’m not an electrical engineer and this is a lot of money if it doesn’t work out. Anyone have any input?

  • 1 month later...
2019Custom Enthusiast

2019Custom

Posted
  • Author
Posted

All responses have been “wait a year or two”. I’ll keep trying and will definitely update the thread if I find anything 

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted
On 3/17/2019 at 11:52 AM, 2019Custom said:

Much appreciated. Contacted a few and all said it’ll likely be a few years since it’s a new model.

 

Found the following for $599 each on eBay (the seller has a right and a left):

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2019-CHEVY-SILVERADO-GMC-SIERRA-MIRROR-POWER-FOLD-BLIND-SPOT-CAMERA-2-LEFT-/273743171851

 

And then the door panel control piece on Napa:

https://www.napaonline.com/en/p/ECHPA3960

 

but I’m concerned that since I’m not an electrical engineer and this is a lot of money if it doesn’t work out. Anyone have any input?

Not as easy as just buying the parts and putting them on, your going to need the wiring harness for both sides and then when you get that your going to have to take it to the dealer and have them program it in the BCM computer for them to work.

  • Like 1
Quiteman Enthusiast

Quiteman

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 3/17/2019 at 10:52 AM, 2019Custom said:

Much appreciated. Contacted a few and all said it’ll likely be a few years since it’s a new model.

 

Found the following for $599 each on eBay (the seller has a right and a left):

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2019-CHEVY-SILVERADO-GMC-SIERRA-MIRROR-POWER-FOLD-BLIND-SPOT-CAMERA-2-LEFT-/273743171851

 

And then the door panel control piece on Napa:

https://www.napaonline.com/en/p/ECHPA3960

 

but I’m concerned that since I’m not an electrical engineer and this is a lot of money if it doesn’t work out. Anyone have any input?

I looked closely at those mirrors and I cannot see the turn signal LED dots that are typically in a DL3 mirror.

I also am looking for a pair of DL3 mirrors for a soon to be purchased 2019 Sierra.

 

Edited by Quiteman
spell check
Quiteman Enthusiast

Quiteman

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Smoothie said:

2019’s do not have turn signals in the mirror.

Thanks for the info !

I did not know that.

Quiteman Enthusiast

Quiteman

Posted
Posted

I was at a dealership yesterday to look at a 2019 Sierra 1500 Limited. It is actually a 2018 double cab model with some minor changes. There are quite a few of them on dealership parking lots. I was told that I could order one if I wanted a particular configuration.

I stumbled upon that model because I was looking for 2019 double cab with the Stone Blue Metallic paint on the exterior. It appears that is the only model available with that color.

Although DL3 mirrors are not available on them they can be upgraded.

Daverado Enthusiast

Daverado

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Quiteman said:

I was at a dealership yesterday to look at a 2019 Sierra 1500 Limited. It is actually a 2018 double cab model with some minor changes. There are quite a few of them on dealership parking lots. I was told that I could order one if I wanted a particular configuration.

I stumbled upon that model because I was looking for 2019 double cab with the Stone Blue Metallic paint on the exterior. It appears that is the only model available with that color.

Although DL3 mirrors are not available on them they can be upgraded.

Yes, Stone Blue is a last-gen K2 color.  NorthSky/Pacific Blue is the new T1 generation blue.

Quiteman Enthusiast

Quiteman

Posted
Posted

I purchased the 2019 Sierra Limited that I posted about on 05/15/2019.

It seems to be an orphan on gm-trucks.com. It is a 2019 but it is really a 2018.:(

I am looking forward to doing the DL3 mirror upgrade on it with Phil's custom harnesses. Unless there is something in the Limited model wiring that is different from what he has available.

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Quiteman said:

I purchased the 2019 Sierra Limited that I posted about on 05/15/2019.

It seems to be an orphan on gm-trucks.com. It is a 2019 but it is really a 2018.:(

I am looking forward to doing the DL3 mirror upgrade on it with Phil's custom harnesses. Unless there is something in the Limited model wiring that is different from what he has available.

Its not an orphan those 2018 body styles are still being produced till September I think is when they will stop making that body style so it is a 2019, my neighbor just bought one a month ago and its titled as a 2019. Its called a 2019 legacy.

Edited by Silverado4x4
Quiteman Enthusiast

Quiteman

Posted
Posted

When I referred to it as an orphan I meant here on gm-trucks.com. It isn't a T1 and it isn't a 2018 in the forum category's.

     That is the way I see it. I'm curious how other members would view it.

I looked at the Legacy model but didn't care for the colored bumpers.

Daverado Enthusiast

Daverado

Posted
Posted
On 5/19/2019 at 11:48 AM, Quiteman said:

When I referred to it as an orphan I meant here on gm-trucks.com. It isn't a T1 and it isn't a 2018 in the forum category's.

     That is the way I see it. I'm curious how other members would view it.

I looked at the Legacy model but didn't care for the colored bumpers.

It's straightforward enough.  Your's is a K2 platform truck, not a T1 platform truck.  All of your answers will be in the K2 forum, not the T1 forum.

 

It would be confusing for both 2019-K2 and 2019-T1 owners if the forums listed 2014-2019 and 2019 as the two different forums.  As it is now it's only confusing for 2019-K2, so it's better.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...