Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, customboss said:

Spent the day at the Ransom E Olds museum. Here’s an engine I raced for GM Motorsports. Where your 2.7 turbo comes from. 
D2AA63E3-BD65-4842-A7BB-3C967D4F69D9.thumb.jpeg.54c4654c70b8cbbdab2dd5d36dfdaf91.jpeg

6D0E9775-6F63-43B5-8BF3-0E9062AEC62B.jpeg

REO was Olds truck division.  Keep that in mind when you see the QUAD 4 which was designed by Oldsmobile. 

 

 

BF8A05A3-0605-43F9-9A8C-3E719089A8CA.jpeg

Edited by customboss
Add some pics
  • Like 1
Posted

My father (1917-1985) was an Olds man.  My earliest memories of his cars was of a 1955 Olds Super 88.  Fast car in its day.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Has anyone tried running E85 yet or maybe even a mix of E85 and 87?

 

I used to have a 2018 BMW with a 4 cylinder turbo, stock I would run about 7 gallons of e85 and fill the rest with 91, ran great, especially in boost. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Slvrado said:

Has anyone tried running E85 yet or maybe even a mix of E85 and 87?

 

I used to have a 2018 BMW with a 4 cylinder turbo, stock I would run about 7 gallons of e85 and fill the rest with 91, ran great, especially in boost. 

I don’t think you can run E85 in these?

Posted
1 hour ago, Slvrado said:

Has anyone tried running E85 yet or maybe even a mix of E85 and 87?

 

I used to have a 2018 BMW with a 4 cylinder turbo, stock I would run about 7 gallons of e85 and fill the rest with 91, ran great, especially in boost. 

You can't run it straight but mix like you did with the BMW wouldn't be a problem.  I mix it in my 2019 with the 6.2.   Run 8 gallons of E85 and the rest 93 in a 24 gallon tank.

  • Like 2
Posted
17 hours ago, Slvrado said:

Has anyone tried running E85 yet or maybe even a mix of E85 and 87?

 

I used to have a 2018 BMW with a 4 cylinder turbo, stock I would run about 7 gallons of e85 and fill the rest with 91, ran great, especially in boost. 

E15 in the 22' Custom Trail Boss L3B runs great without but a hint of MPG loss.  The timing stability is better too.  The L3B is really interesting after a 3469 mile trip to Indiana, Michigan then back Colorado.  I tested a few different schemes enroute with a few notes to share later here. 

 

Tuning an engine for ethanol octane and mechanical energy capability is key. A turbo engine can use that clean cool burn capability. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

794666378_ScreenShot2021-11-20at11_40_47.png.0f4b529b114c59e45c6d03ea47912f91.png

17 hours ago, Mike Borowski said:

I don’t think you can run E85 in these?

Any modern engine can burn E85 but the pulse width, timing curve and fuel map will not be optimized nor are our gasoline spark engines designed to optimize the fuel. I had a 2011 VW GTI 2.0 with APR tune, down pipe etc and burned E85 90% of the time with great results and good MPG.  When we had to replace the turbo pressure relief valve at or over ~100,000 miles for worn out seal techs could not believe the carbon making GTI 2.0 T was so clean, literally no valve deposits, no pistons deposits, no turbo deposits. 

On stock engines you will get a MIL code for fuel density out of spec ( generally at 50% ETOH in fuel) and sensed lean which will over-fuel needlessly because it thinks its too lean for that fuel. Timing will go as far as ECM allows. Most summer E85 is about 70% ETOH and runs great.  

 

Non turbo engines really depend on tune and setup but the engines can't optimize its use but will run fine on it with degraded MPG because the engine was designed to gasoline which is heat energy rich not mechanical energy rich. 

Edited by customboss
add pics and video
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 6/17/2022 at 5:58 PM, Black02Silverado said:

You can't run it straight but mix like you did with the BMW wouldn't be a problem.  I mix it in my 2019 with the 6.2.   Run 8 gallons of E85 and the rest 93 in a 24 gallon tank.


My biggest concern was eating away a fuel line or something, but most newer cars all the plastics and rubbers are designed for it since most gas has ethanol in it already. 

Posted
On 6/18/2022 at 9:52 AM, customboss said:

E15 in the 22' Custom Trail Boss L3B runs great without but a hint of MPG loss.  The timing stability is better too.  The L3B is really interesting after a 3469 mile trip to Indiana, Michigan then back Colorado.  I tested a few different schemes enroute with a few notes to share later here. 

 

Tuning an engine for ethanol octane and mechanical energy capability is key. A turbo engine can use that clean cool burn capability. 

Yeah i know for BMW’s they make tunes that bump up the injectors output to compensate for the fuels. Our trucks are still so new I doubt thats available yet. I may try a heavy mix like 15 gallons of e85 and 4-5 gallons of 87 and see how it goes; worst case scenario It throws a lean code and MPG is bad till i can get some more regular gas in the tank.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Maybe we should start an E85 thread for the 2.7L and share data. The truck are designed for it but if we build data on it maybe we can get to safe usage levels. Here in california E85 is half the cost of 87 so being able to run a heavy mix of e85 would be nice, im sure others will benefit from the knowledge as well. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Slvrado said:

Maybe we should start an E85 thread for the 2.7L and share data. The truck are designed for it but if we build data on it maybe we can get to safe usage levels. Here in california E85 is half the cost of 87 so being able to run a heavy mix of e85 would be nice, im sure others will benefit from the knowledge as well. 

Running E100 isn’t unsafe in any modern engine. You’ll get a nuisance code via MIL and overfuel needlessly. Of course we already overfuel needlessly with gasoline at 100%. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, customboss said:

Running E100 isn’t unsafe in any modern engine. You’ll get a nuisance code via MIL and overfuel needlessly. Of course we already overfuel needlessly with gasoline at 100%. 

 

Which begs a question. If over fueling on alcohols how does that effect fuel dilution? Does it have a 'different effect' then gasoline? Would it even show up in the GC as fuel dilution? 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Which begs a question. If over fueling on alcohols how does that effect fuel dilution? Does it have a 'different effect' then gasoline? Would it even show up in the GC as fuel dilution? 

Good questions.  

 

Density of ethanol is 0.79 kg/l, which is slightly higher than that of gasoline 0.7489 kg/l. Higher density improves volumetric fuel economy to some extent compensating a bit for lower BTU. The oxygen content of ethanol is 35%. 

 

Higher octane is another positive that compensates for an engine that can be tuned to optimize that benefit and most ECM's will try within limits of fuels mapping and physical capabilities of fuel delivery system.  

 

Our gasoline engines are  over-fueling with ETOH because the fuels system and engine are designed for gasolines lower per unit density and higher BTU and most importantly the density change has the non ETOH fuel map WRONGLY accommodating what it detects as a lean condition. 

 

It's more solvent and it burns cleaner so that physical property compensates to a degree for the poor tuning for ethanol. 

 

NO, ethanol will not show up as a gasoline reference GC.   Testing for ethanol would require the GC to be reset for that chem  signature.  Same as testing diesel, diesel crossover with gasoline is small. So always make sure the lab gets the fuel correct. 

 

ETOH has a positive cleansing affectation to the PCV/CCV and EGR systems because of the solvency and clean burn characteristics. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...