Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, afterburner82 said:

Fuel Rage 20”x9” +1 offset w/305-55r20 Amp Terrain Attack tires on 4” Readylift SST. No rubbing or modifications.

 

AA714EE9-4091-4FAE-8106-F75D441842D6.jpeg

Looks great! Have any side shots?

Posted (edited)

Does anyone know what size spacer I'll need to fit the CK160 wheels on my 2020? The company that sent me the wheels said 1/4" would be enough but its not clearing the front calipers.

Edited by Tbaem
Posted
On 1/19/2021 at 11:26 AM, MeximusPrime said:

OE Creations Replicas PR197  20x9
Nitto RG 275/60/20
GM 2" Lift

 

IMG_8586.jpg

IMG_8587.jpg

If I may ask, where did you get your wheels from? Any spacers needed to clear the calipers, etc?  Thanks 

Posted
1 hour ago, Mack Mason said:

If I may ask, where did you get your wheels from? Any spacers needed to clear the calipers, etc?  Thanks 

Absolutely. No spacers needed.

 

I bought them directly through Discount Tire who is a dealer for Wheel Pros. Once I found the wheels I wanted through website below I called discount and placed the order.

 

https://www.wheelpros.com/wheels/oe-creations/

 

Posted

Anyone go from the Nitto Ridge Grapplers to the Terra Grappler G2 and were overall happy with the change? This is for stock size 275/60/20 in p rated XL.

Posted (edited)

Vision Rocker, 22x10 (-19)

Nitto Ridge Grappler, 285/55/22

Bracket mod w/ major trimmed splash guards, minor rub

TB 5.jpg

TB 2.jpg

TB 4.jpg

Edited by EZ Money
add photo
  • Like 1
Posted

Excuse the dirty truck. Stock height with CK160s and 285/45/22 tires.

Silverado2.jpg

Posted (edited)

I have the same CK160s wheels but did not fit my AT4 due to the calipers.  Did you puts spacers?  What size?  Do you have any more pics showing the stance or how much the wheels stick out past the fenders.

Edited by cansled
Posted (edited)

6 in zone lift kit,

20x12 xtream mudder rims,

35x12.5R20LT Nitto Ridge Grapplers, 

-44 offset

No spacers needed

There was a bit of plastic and metal trimming involved, but nothing to crazy

 

truck.jpg

Edited by Mrgolde
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 1/11/2021 at 7:30 PM, rico750sxi said:

Guys, I need assistance and opinions please regarding my setup I just purchased and test fit. The wheels are 20x9, 0 offset Moto Metal MO970 with 106.25mm hub bore. I purchased 3/8” spacers as suggested by Custom Offsets for caliper clearance. The Bora spacers are not hubcentric high concerns me, they fit the stock hub tightly but the wheels only mount lug centric now. That is my first concern and my second is the stud engagement with the spacer installed. I only get about 5.5 to 6 turns on the lug nut before seated (not torqued). I have some crappy 6mm spacers that I test fit and these gave me much better engagement and I could get 8 turns of the lug before seated. CustomOffsets said I was good to go when I called them as they said I had the right spacers and 6 turns of the lug was acceptable. 

Am I okay running the wheels lug centric?  Am I okay with 6 turns of the lug nut on the stud? I’ve found 6mm spacers by ReadyLift that they state go from factory hub bore to 106mm hub bore which I am thinking about getting. Should I go that route? What are others doing, I haven’t found too much info except for info on bigger spacers. Thanks

https://www.readylift.com/6mm-wheel-spacers-gm-1500-2019-2021.html
 

 

 

Did you ever get a response on this? I'm looking at a set of wheels that will require 8mm or a 3/8" spacer and I'm concerned about the threads left as well. I plan on having Bora make a custom set of hub and wheel centric spacers that match the wheel bore. 

Edited by dirtfan21

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...