Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/5/2022 at 1:32 AM, Jordy 604 said:

20220930_010557.jpg

20220917_180645.jpg

Specs on your setup?

Posted

This gentleman says he’s put a 285/65/20 set on his AT4. Stock. No rubbing. Haven’t seen anyone else put on this size tire. Can anyone confirm this?? I’m about to pull the trigger on a set for my ‘19 AT4 if so. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/20/2021 at 5:47 PM, GxOxBxLxN said:

Black Rhino 20x9.5 +12mm 

Ridge Grapplers 33x12.50

GM 2” lift and 2” spacer in front

 

 

 

 

6E79EBAA-8C28-4DBC-AD15-73B47946C626.jpeg

37B2F98D-775E-4192-8CE7-C381E16FCEDA.jpeg


I can’t stop looking at this setup! I have some 305/55s in the garage waiting to go on… this is the look I want!

 

You say 2” GM + 2” spacer. So, this is a 4” lift? Or, you put 2” wheel spacers?

 

Any chance you could upload some side pics and a pic from the back? My truck is silver with chrome steps x31 also.

Posted
On 3/22/2022 at 3:38 PM, TyAT4_6.2 said:

Stock height? Any rubbing or trimming?


sorry for the late response. That was stock at4 height there wasn’t much rubbing at all except in certain situations it could touch the mud flap a little bit but not enough to worry about trimming.

Posted
7 hours ago, Andy Toledo said:

20x9 Fuel Rebels +20

1.5 spacers

37 Falken Wildpeaks

6” RC lift with Vertex COs

 

D605D498-D56C-4E2E-9C9B-77E343736207.jpeg

What brand spacers and any issues with torque or vibrations?

 

Awesome ride!

 

 

 

 

Posted
On 12/1/2022 at 9:16 PM, daltonc2425 said:

What brand spacers and any issues with torque or vibrations?

 

Awesome ride!

 

 

 

 

KSP hub centric spacers. No issues at all 

  • Like 1
Posted

Why buy spacers instead of 0 or negative offset wheels to get the look/fitment you want?

Posted

20 x 9 Fuel Contra  +2

35/12.5s Kenda Klever R/T Hybrids

3" Superlift w/A arms

No Spacers . Slight rub at full lock when hitting a dip. Trimmed Mud flaps and pulled back liner   409056859_Trucknewwheels.thumb.jpg.ae8be0b1ff558186d970e0201cc37aca.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

295/70/r18 KO2's on stock AT4 rims, no lift, no level. She rubs but barely at full lock when going up/down an incline on angle. I do have the added on mud flaps which is what they're hitting. With them removed no rubbing at all. 

IMG_20221204_191313.jpg

IMG_20221204_211745.jpg

IMG_20221204_211416.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
On 12/4/2022 at 7:18 PM, GETGONE said:

Why buy spacers instead of 0 or negative offset wheels to get the look/fitment you want?

Bought wheels that would work with different lift kit. Lift was in back order so switched lift kits and wheels wouldn’t clear so it was easier to get spacers than buying another set of wheels. Plan to buy new wheels with offset I want in near future to eliminate spacers 

Posted
11 hours ago, Chrisd534 said:

295/70/r18 KO2's on stock AT4 rims, no lift, no level. She rubs but barely at full lock when going up/down an incline on angle. I do have the added on mud flaps which is what they're hitting. With them removed no rubbing at all. 

IMG_20221204_191313.jpg

IMG_20221204_211745.jpg

IMG_20221204_211416.jpg

Truck looks good! Did you do the clear reflectors on the headlights?!?

Posted
13 hours ago, Chrisd534 said:

295/70/r18 KO2's on stock AT4 rims, no lift, no level. She rubs but barely at full lock when going up/down an incline on angle. I do have the added on mud flaps which is what they're hitting. With them removed no rubbing at all. 

IMG_20221204_191313.jpg

IMG_20221204_211745.jpg

IMG_20221204_211416.jpg

More pics of headlights? you do them yourself?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...