Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think people not knowing shows just how nice DFM really is. I couldn't tell if I tried. Between that and the wonderful 8 speed tranny, coupled with the gas mileage I'm getting, I say leave well enough alone. And, as mentioned above, enjoy the ride;)

  • Like 3
Posted
On 8/16/2019 at 8:53 AM, MacLaren said:

I think people not knowing shows just how nice DFM really is. I couldn't tell if I tried. Between that and the wonderful 8 speed tranny, coupled with the gas mileage I'm getting, I say leave well enough alone. And, as mentioned above, enjoy the ride;)

yeah,  what he ^^^^^ said...

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Pickup Truck talk did a video on YouTube called

 

"2019 Chevrolet Silverado dynamic fule management demonstration" 

 

Hopefully this helps

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanx Matty Patty!

Great video.

GM has a real winner with this new DFM & 8 Speed Tranny.

I have a little over 2,300 miles, my overall average is now 19.6 mpg! That's awesome.

After filling up last, I've driven about 100 miles and my average on this tank is 22mpg and, that's all rural no interstate driving. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I totally disagree with the engineer in the video - I think showing the information similar to what he has on his little silver box on the DIC would be easy and just as cool as seeing what angle my truck is at, or how much air filter life I have left...  I wish this was available.

  • Like 2
Posted
17 hours ago, Chris Callanan said:

I totally disagree with the engineer in the video - I think showing the information similar to what he has on his little silver box on the DIC would be easy and just as cool as seeing what angle my truck is at, or how much air filter life I have left...  I wish this was available.

I think the issue is getting the average Joe to understand what they’re seeing onscreen without the driver thinking something is wrong, becoming information overload or worse yet turning them into a distracted driver. I think going from a consistent deactivation pattern to something more random, for lack of better words, is what ended the display onscreen.

 

Maybe GM will figure out a way to translate it to a more easy to understand form & bring back the cylinder count in the future. They’ve got their hands full right now fine tuning things & dealing with the previously unplanned midcycle refresh then development for T2 will be coming up soon.

Posted

Most likely another reason it is not displayed is because if you could see all the cylinder changes you would also start to feel when it changes. If you dont know it's doing it you are less likely to notice the "feeling" of the different dfm modes. I honestly rarely felt the dfm activate before I put a exhaust on. Now with the exhaust I can not only hear when dfm kicks in I can also feel the slight vibrations of it changing   cylinders.

Posted

There was nothing but bitching about the driveability of the last version of AFM. Thread after thread about how to work with it or defeat it.

 

I'm also in the camp that thinks that not being able to tell it is active is excellent news.

It was probably likely one of the design/development targets.

 

Did I read there are 18 modes it can operate in?

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 8/29/2019 at 10:51 PM, Chris Callanan said:

I totally disagree with the engineer in the video - I think showing the information similar to what he has on his little silver box on the DIC would be easy and just as cool as seeing what angle my truck is at, or how much air filter life I have left...  I wish this was available.

Any chance you remember which video it was?  Searching TFL's stuff and can't seem to find it.

Posted

Anytime your not at wot or under load dfm is working. There's too many variations as to which cylinder's run under different driving conditions to have a readout of how it's performing. It probably wouldn't even be a second before it switched off to a different combination. Which is also why you can't feel it. All you feel is the constant changing of operational cylinders, which is the only feeling you know. Where as with afm there was only V8 and v4; you either had full torque or half of it.  

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 8/30/2019 at 12:51 AM, Chris Callanan said:

I totally disagree with the engineer in the video - I think showing the information similar to what he has on his little silver box on the DIC would be easy and just as cool as seeing what angle my truck is at, or how much air filter life I have left...  I wish this was available.

I also totally disagree with the engineer that there is no excess wear and tear on the lifters and pushrods!  What a crock!  All in the name of ONE mile per gallon.  One word.  Pulsar LT. 

Posted (edited)

I can sometimes barely feel the lugging when driving at a constant speed. I assume this I'd the DFM. I have an average of about 20 mpg for 20,000 miles so far. I do idle an hour or two everyday at work. I get 22 to 24 mpg on trips, even got 27 mpg on flat roads going 60mph. I got the 5.3 4x4 crew cab. In my last 3 work trucks were v6 not ecoboost single cab 2wd f150 I got 12 to 17mpg. So considering I have a crew cab, v8, and 4x4 and always beat the mileage that I would get in v6 ford I would say DFM works pretty well. I estimate I will save over $8,000 in fuel costs going from Ford 3.3 to chevy 5.3 over 200,000 miles.

Edited by Adamace1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 874 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...