Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 12/6/2019 at 3:52 PM, SamDSJR said:

My configuration is 11,400lbs. 2019 5.3 w/Max Tow, 3.42, 4x4, 8-Speed tranny, Crew Cab Short Bed, 18" rims.

 I also have the Max Tow/NHT 2019 Sierra Elevation.

The ride is definitely more firm in this truck compared to my last truck, 2007 Silverado Z71.  Last truck had original shocks in it that were probably quite worn out and helped with the “soft ride”.

I equate the ride in my current truck to perhaps how a 3/4 ton would’ve felt 10-15 years ago.  The rear end does feel “bouncy” hitting bumps at speed.

I’m also running BFG KO2’s that are an LT tire on 20” rims and a leveling kit up front.

I’m sure that doesn’t help with the ride either!

I’m curious as to how this truck will handle my 24’ TT next spring.  My last truck felt very “floaty” while towing, where this one I’m thinking will be more “solid”.

 

What is everyone’s opinion on the Max Tow/NHT suspension and ride quality?

Would Bilstien 5100 improve the day to day ride quality?

Edited by madconcept
Posted
20 hours ago, Snuff said:

Yes - I am going to run stock springs and see how it goes.

do you know what stock spring rate is for 19 silverados?...….700lbs?

 

 feels ike it has no dampening in stock shock and springs are doing most of work on stock silverados….

 

I may just go this route over kings, idk for my purpose eibachs probably be good fit, kings maybe overkill for me...and don't know how much nicer they would be,.plus eibach is only 20min away and can just go there and have em do it....they have good reviews for daily driver with minor offroad use....

 

what is labor cost generally to have 4 shocks installed.....I could probably do it myself but don't have space 

Posted

I just recently installed the new Eibachs and they have made a dramatic improvement over the stock front shocks. I already had Rancho adjustable 9000's on the rear for a few months and felt the difference between front and rear on large bumps especially at higher speeds on freeway bridge transitions. The 305/55-20 Dick Cepek Trail Country EXP tires are much heavier and stiffer  (62lbs vs. 41) than stock tires so the front would bounce uncomfortably at times. The new shocks don't do that and feel smoother on smooth roads and a little rougher on bumpier roads, but not too rough. Over driveways and speed bumps they actually feel smoother and the truck doesn't bottom out or bounce up and down. I had and kept on a Superlift 2' leveling kit on front and set the new shocks to the second to the highest setting for a 3" total lift in front. So with the 2 inch rear blocks the truck measures 41" high all around. The truck used to rock side to side if you jiggled the steering  wheel and felt like my old overloaded service van rocking when it did that. that too is gone.

  • Like 2
Posted

I had 5100’s put on my ‘15 Ford FX4 Lariat. They made a HUGE difference. However; the Ranchos on my TB LT are excellent and feel as well, if not better, than the 5100’s on my Ford. I will not be changing to Bilstiens this time. 

  • Like 3
Posted

It aligned fine and they added some caster according to the results sheet. I'm sure both control arms are somewhat droopy, but I really don't feel any abnormalities in the handling. It's a marked improvement over stock. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I really hope these are released soon.  I loved them on my '18, lots of improvement.  My '19 Trail Boss has larger tires, and after about 13,000 miles it feels like I have a blow front shock.   Ranchos are not great, they could do MUCH better with factory options IMO.  

Posted
On 8/15/2019 at 12:38 PM, Sin City Trail Boss said:

Interesting.

 

How will the 5100s compare to my stock Z71 Rancho shocks that come with the Trail Boss?

 

 

 

 

If the 5100s work like the ones I put on my 2014 will loose any ride quality the truck came with. Very happy with the way the truck rides now. Keeping mine stock happy camper here.  

  • Like 1
Posted

All,

 

I reached out to Bilstein for an updated date now that we are into the new year.  Their response.....

 

"We are estimating by the end of 2nd quarter"

 

And the wait continues........

  • 1 month later...
Posted

The rear Bilstein B8 5100 shocks are now released.  I just bought a pair and put them on my 2019 Silverado RST Z71.  Made a big difference just having them swapped out on the rear.  I bought Bilstein PN 24-293471. The fronts are not yet available. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GM Niner said:

The rear Bilstein B8 5100 shocks are now released.  I just bought a pair and put them on my 2019 Silverado RST Z71.  Made a big difference just having them swapped out on the rear.  I bought Bilstein PN 24-293471. The fronts are not yet available. 

does it ride stock height? or are you lifted?

  • Like 1
Posted

I run stock height.  I believe the PN 24-293471 is good for 0 to +1" on the RST.  If you go to Bilstein's website and look up your truck, it shows PN 24-309516 for a Custom Trail Boss (which has a stock 2" lift), and also says it's good for 0 to +1".  So if your truck is lifted it may be best to contact Bilstein for your best option.

Posted (edited)

rears have been out for awhile.....lot of kits come with them, I don't think they are any different than 2018 in rear cuz am pretty sure someone has already swapped his out from last gen to new gen

but yeah.....idk wtf takes a company almost 2 years to come out with product.....i think fox too in 2.0 aren't out

Edited by Dunn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 457 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...