Jump to content

6.2L or Baby Duramax

djones208

Recommended Posts

djones208 New Member

djones208

Posted
Posted

Hey all, looking for some opinions and input. I know it's been discussed but now that the 3.0 has been out a little longer I wanted to ask. I have a 2017 Z71 5.3l. It's leveled on 33-12.5 M/T. I don't tow often but plan on rowing some more in the and possibly picking up a smaller travel trailer. It does fine, but the tires definitely killed mpg, my mostly highway combined is usually 13-15. What are thoughts on 3.0l vs 6.2 in terms of both towing and mpg with larger load range E tires? I'm primarily looking at the 6.2L LT TB vs the RST Z71 3.0. From a visual standpoint I could go either way, I'd probably leave the TB alone for a while but level with wheels and tires right off the bat with the RST.

 

Anyone have real world mpg on either engine with 33s? Or towing with either? Ive owned a 2500 in the past but want to bridge the price gap until I actually buy something large enough to justify needing the towing capability of the 2500.

 

Thank you!

 

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
BigDog88 Enthusiast

BigDog88

Posted
Posted

Ive never owned the 3.0 diesel.  But i bought a brand new 6.2 Max Tow HC Silverado a month or so ago and have pulled my TT with it once through the hills of southern Missouri and back to KC last week.  I got 8.9 mpg running 70 on cruise control. pulling the 31 ft TT that weights between 6,800-8,200 depending on how its loaded.  Not great but it had plenty of power, noticeably more than my 5.3 had pulling same trailer on the same route.  Im happy with it, but also because gas is cheap (even with using Premium fuel), so not a big deal.   I personally also prefer the sound of a V8 over a small diesel.  I have seen good towing reviews on the 3.0 and of course would give you alot better mileage when not towing.  

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

If you find a 3.0 diesel with 20" wheels from the factory, the stock 20" tire they use is a 33 inch tire (275/60R20), non LT rated.  Might still be a good rough measure on where fuel mileage would be.  LT tires you are probably 5-10lbs more per tire.  

 

How much trailer are you towing?  Curb weight or GVWR of the trailer?  

sweatandsteel Enthusiast

sweatandsteel

Posted
Posted

I was considering the same thing as we plan on purchasing a travel trailer in the next couple of years. I stuck with the 6.2 since I was used to it and know what to expect. A part of me wanted to try the 3.0 but didn't want to be in early if there are unknown issues that haven't popped up yet. 

TRKLGND Enthusiast

TRKLGND

Posted
Posted

Don't level it.  Whichever truck you go with please don't level it if you are going to be towing.  700lb - 800lb of tongue weight plus whatever else you put in the bed will have the nose of your truck point 2" - 3" up in the air.  Not only is that not good for steering and your front tire wear, it looks retarded.
 

Jav_eee Enthusiast

Jav_eee

Posted
Posted
Don't level it.  Whichever truck you go with please don't level it if you are going to be towing.  700lb - 800lb of tongue weight plus whatever else you put in the bed will have the nose of your truck point 2" - 3" up in the air.  Not only is that not good for steering and your front tire wear, it looks retarded.
 

Looks are subjective. And besides, even stock height trucks can sag. Level it if you want but make damn sure you adjust your headlights afterwards.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
pewterliftedz Enthusiast

pewterliftedz

Posted
Posted

It's a toss up, I've had 6.2s on my 2 previous trucks, and it's a great engine with power across the powerband (more so up top).  Once I threw a set of 295/60r20 tires on it though, the power was sucked away compared to stock.  The factory 3.23 gearing and 8 speed trans sucked for bigger tires, maybe the new A10 would be better.  It towed great, but as with all LS engines, it needed to down shift and get the RPMs up to get going.

 

I now have the new 3.0, and the instant torque is great, but it lacks horsepower up top where the 6.2s used to shine.  I've towed very little with the new truck, and it was only 3,000 lbs or so, but it felt like nothing was back there around town.  I'm only running a Nitto Ridge Grappler  275/55r20 XL on my truck, since I wanted a light weight tire to maintain great highway mileage.

 

It really a toss up, but I bought the 3.0 so I could get great fuel mileage for my daily 90 mile commute.  If you can find a RST with the "Diesel Off Road PAckage", you would be ready for bigger tires with the 3.73 gear ratio that is included.  The 6.2 definitely gives you more smiles per gallon, but you fuel mileage will suffer with bigger E load tires.

TRKLGND Enthusiast

TRKLGND

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Jav_eee said:


Looks are subjective. And besides, even stock height trucks can sag. Level it if you want but make damn sure you adjust your headlights afterwards.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

If a stock truck sags 2" it is now level and the suspension works as designed with a load.  If a leveled truck sags 2" the front end is 4" up from spec.  Less weight on the front tires, less steering control and it looks horrible.  Subjective, yes.  Show me one person that truly likes that look.

Likarok Senior Enthusiast

Likarok

Posted
Posted

It sounds like the 2.8 Duramax in the Colorado's is going to be dropped when the Colorado / Canyon redesign happens next. And even the 3.6 V6 for that matter. Looking at a Turbo 4 cylinder.

steve841 Enthusiast

steve841

Posted
Posted

I owned a 19 with the 6.2L and now a 20 with the the 3L Duramax.

 

Here's the simple of it:

 

6.2L beast of an engine. Fast as hell. Sucks fuel.  Did I mention it SUCKS FUEL? And likes premium on top of that.

3.0L Sweet smooth diesel and only sips fuel compared to the 6.2.  Not obnoxiously loud.  Only downside, DEF.

 

So, unless you're holeshotting every light. Racing other folks up the highway, the diesel is king.  Tows pretty much the same amount and less visits to the gas station.

Jav_eee Enthusiast

Jav_eee

Posted
Posted

3.0L Sweet smooth diesel and only sips fuel compared to the 6.2.  Not obnoxiously loud.  Only downside, DEF.
 


DEF, a limited life DPF and an EGR that’ll clog soon enough, and frequent fuel filter changes although they’re not as pricey as the bigger diesels...

Maybe I need a 3.0 instead of a 6.2...



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
pewterliftedz Enthusiast

pewterliftedz

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Jav_eee said:

 


DEF, a limited life DPF and an EGR that’ll clog soon enough, and frequent fuel filter changes although they’re not as pricey as the bigger diesels...

Maybe I need a 3.0 instead of a 6.2...



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

Do you consider 30,000 mile fuel filter changes frequent?  DPF and EGR are under warranty for 5 year/100,000 miles, so I've got plenty of worry free miles ahead.

Jav_eee Enthusiast

Jav_eee

Posted
Posted
Do you consider 30,000 mile fuel filter changes frequent?  DPF and EGR are under warranty for 5year/100,000 miles, so I've got plenty of worry free miles ahead.

I consider 30,000 miles to far in between and would never go that far. Used to do them every 12k on my f250. DPF and egr usually go at about 125k so fingers crossed!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
steve841 Enthusiast

steve841

Posted
Posted

Thats pretty extensive knowledge about an engine that just came out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • teamjnz
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By teamjnz · Posted

      Sounds like converting will be a bigger endeavor than I was thinking. This truck doesn't have 2Hi like the Suburban did. The Tahoe has 4Hi and 4Lo and a button to turn of traction control.   From what I understand the Stabilitrak uses open diff in the front and rear. When wheel speed is not the same the stabilitrak uses the ABS system to slowdown the spinning wheel(s) to transfer power to the slower non-spinning wheel(s). I thought the transfer case was open too. Being able to transfer power either more to front or rear depending on wheel spin. Maybe I miss understood some information with you saying and power transfer is 50-50. Thanks
    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...