Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought they were interesting when they first came out again. I found around here that the Texas edition full size were cheaper most of the time. I prefer early 2000s trucks now anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I would of bought one if it had a Bench seat , I hate buckets and the center divider... , raise the roofline and make the 5.3 stock motor, they would sell 

Posted
On 10/28/2020 at 9:47 PM, flyingfool said:

i found the windows too small on the new colorado, and no shoulder room, roof is too low for me. i'de rather buy a base model silverado with a small engine than mess with a colorado

How tall are you 7 foot? I am 6'5 275lbs with broad shoulders and am no where close to brushing my head on the roof of my dads Canyon. It has 1 inch less of head room than my Silverado according to GM (2014 so same body style of the OP's truck). It is skinnier but I am not at all hurting for room even after 4+ hours in the drivers seat, I actually prefer driving his than mine. I have a little more room to spread out in mine (I have the folding bench in the LT) but leg room, head room and shoulder room is not lacking. My dad is 6'4 and we sit side by side without touching just fine, the console is fairly wide with the arm rest. The seats have broken in and are pretty comfortable, overall I give the edge to my truck but would be very happy living with the smaller Canyon and will do so next go around. 

 

OP, the best you can do is go sit in one and see. The Crew Cab short bed Colorado will have 15 inches of less wheelbase and 18 inches of less length which is pretty significant. It will still be about 13 inches longer in wheel base and 22 inches longer in length than the grand cherokee but will still be a pretty significant step in terms of maneuverability compared to your current truck. Have to buy what works and makes you happy, so go test one and if you have the means do it, pay attention to comfort as some have issues but most do not but that is unique to each person. 

 

Tyler

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, amxguy1970 said:

How tall are you 7 foot? I am 6'5 275lbs with broad shoulders and am no where close to brushing my head on the roof of my dads Canyon. It has 1 inch less of head room than my Silverado according to GM (2014 so same body style of the OP's truck). It is skinnier but I am not at all hurting for room even after 4+ hours in the drivers seat, I actually prefer driving his than mine. I have a little more room to spread out in mine (I have the folding bench in the LT) but leg room, head room and shoulder room is not lacking. My dad is 6'4 and we sit side by side without touching just fine, the console is fairly wide with the arm rest. The seats have broken in and are pretty comfortable, overall I give the edge to my truck but would be very happy living with the smaller Canyon and will do so next go around. 

 

OP, the best you can do is go sit in one and see. The Crew Cab short bed Colorado will have 15 inches of less wheelbase and 18 inches of less length which is pretty significant. It will still be about 13 inches longer in wheel base and 22 inches longer in length than the grand cherokee but will still be a pretty significant step in terms of maneuverability compared to your current truck. Have to buy what works and makes you happy, so go test one and if you have the means do it, pay attention to comfort as some have issues but most do not but that is unique to each person. 

 

Tyler

it's build for the shorter Latino market IMO, it feels closterphobic to me, i'm 6'2: 185 lbs tall torso.  I cant stand the interior.  i like head room, coming from a old K5,  i see full size Land ROvers and MBZ G-wagons and I wish we had that kinda headroom

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
it's build for the shorter Latino market IMO, it feels closterphobic to me, i'm 6'2: 185 lbs tall torso.  I cant stand the interior.  i like head room, coming from a old K5,  i see full size Land ROvers and MBZ G-wagons and I wish we had that kinda headroom

Dunno about the ethnicity part but, yeah def with you on feeling cramped. I took a $3k hit just to dump mine for model year older Silverado with 30k more miles. The 2017 Colorado Crew Cab Z71 was the worst truck I ever owned.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Wow, not sure what to make of this. I traded a 2018 Jeep Cherokee (Not the Grand Cherokee) for my 2021 GMC Canyon Denali Crew Cab. The reason we got rid of the Cherokee is two fold, 1) it sat lower than we wanted and 2) the passenger side lacked a bit of room in the leg area. 

 

I am 6'1" tall and weigh 300#  Sadly, my legs are not in tune with my torso otherwise I would be closer to 6'5". 

 

The room in the Canyon is perfectly fine for me in either of the front seats. As for the rear seat, well, I don't care but,  it is okay. 

 

Our other car is a 2011 F-150 SuperCab. 

 

From my point of view I feel the room in both trucks is perfectly fine. Very comfortable. And no sense of being claustrophobic. 

 

Living in the mountains of Colorado, every trip is a drive. While there is a small grocery store in our little town, the bigger grocery store is an hour away, one way. 

 

And, no, I am not Latino. And I am obviously not of a smaller stature. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Well one of our most reliable vehicles was sold yesterday. The first and only I gave for free to a grandkid. If they got skin in the game they take care of it. My wife bought new. Five years later my daughter got it to use. We got it back and gave it to our grandson after graduation. He did zero maintenance just oil changes. When the AC quit he drove his mother’s car rather than get it fixed. Instead he just bought a beater and sold the Elantra. 
    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...