Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, Bonefisher said:

kpanza... i have an order in since middle July in for a 2021 SLT sounds like very similar spec but with sunroof... and no push back as of yet...  let me know if you here on yours!!

 

image.thumb.png.99c023d63da0cf6f39048c43f8c2cff6.png

 

image.thumb.png.f00f6f924172a7a5cab019ff54b9edc2.png

Bonefisher,

 

Cool!  I will let you know if I hear anything, you do the same.  Our trucks are very similar!  Most important to me was the Tech pkg with the cameras for towing, plus the mirrors.  Why they didn't allow those features on a MAX TOW truck last year makes zero sense, so hopefully they allow it this year.  I never use the sunroof, so I opted for the Performance pkg instead.  Hopefully these trucks get delivered before OCTOBER, which I heard was the estimate...guess we will see.

 

 

Posted (edited)
On 8/4/2020 at 5:31 PM, Ted Turner said:

 Long time lurker but I think the guy is trying to say that it makes no sense to buy a short bed if you have any intention of using it as a truck. By that same logic I'm not too sure that a short bed is much more functional than a mid-size SUV with the back seats folded flat. 

 

 

I'm currently in the process of trying to find one I like for the right price as I already have a 2018 dc, but the T1 double cabs are the best looking trucks on the road right now

 

yeah that guy is kind of a dick how he said it, but the point is true. You would be better off with a large SUV with folding back seats if your goal is to Carry around 4 people. I owned GM trucks for the past 35 years and it is kind of a joke to watch all the mall trucks. i guess in todays day and age everyones a badass and you aren't allowed to prove otherwise. Back in the good ole days those people would have been ridiculed

 

 

that's a fact jack!!

 

 

that is the problem. Makes them all seem like super sierra put it as poserish. guilty by association

 

I think he was just making fun of you'll. I take it most of you'll ain't from the south. there are some very sensitive people on these forums. like I said before everyone where I live knows that crew cab short box are for women and rich people who don't know what they are buying. been that way since the beginning of time

I guess most people here don't understand your viewpoint, nor do I, All this because 1 cab has a rear seat, and the other cab has a rear seat but 1.5 foot longer cab, But buy an SUV as you stated, how the hell can I carry large, oily inspection tools for pipelines, so tell the other guys I work with to take a separate car because a guy on the internet said I should have purchased a truck with a cab that's 1.5 foot shorter. I don’t know what king a masculinity issues you have, but your point makes no sense, If buying a truck with a cab that 1.5 foot shorter makes you feel like a man, you need help.

Edited by mdreynolds
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, mdreynolds said:

I guess most people here don't understand your viewpoint, nor do I, All this because 1 cab has a rear seat, and the other cab has a rear seat but 1.5 foot longer cab, But buy an SUV as you stated, how the hell can I carry large, oily inspection tools for pipelines, so tell the other guys I work with to take a separate car because a guy on the internet said I should have purchased a truck with a cab that's 1.5 foot shorter. I don’t know what king a masculinity issues you have, but your point makes no sense, If buying a truck with a cab that 1.5 foot shorter makes you feel like a man, you need help.

You got the wrong one jack. I cdon't care what somebody else drives. I just think the crew cab short boxes look funny and aren't nearly as utilitarian. Where I'm from only women and the rich folk drive crew cabs but if that what you like bub by all means it ain't no skin off my back. If you really using the bed in a crew cab the point remains that you would be better off with another vehicle. But it ain't my money. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Ted Turner said:

You got the wrong one jack. I cdon't care what somebody else drives. I just think the crew cab short boxes look funny and aren't nearly as utilitarian. Where I'm from only women and the rich folk drive crew cabs but if that what you like bub by all means it ain't no skin off my back. If you really using the bed in a crew cab the point remains that you would be better off with another vehicle. But it ain't my money. 

I agree with you that most of the folks I see use these trucks as nothing more than status symbols, but mine works perfect for me as a service vehicle.  I can keep my electronics / spare parts in the back seat area to keep them dry and my several ladders / tool boxes fit perfect in the back of my short box.  The bonus for me with the short bed is I can get around downtown easily where it's a little bit tighter and clean out the back seat and have space for people/dogs on the weekends.  I'm probably more the exception than the rule on this one though.

  • Like 1
Posted
You got the wrong one jack. I cdon't care what somebody else drives. I just think the crew cab short boxes look funny and aren't nearly as utilitarian. Where I'm from only women and the rich folk drive crew cabs but if that what you like bub by all means it ain't no skin off my back. If you really using the bed in a crew cab the point remains that you would be better off with another vehicle. But it ain't my money. 
Or maybe people have different needs than you? Is the only right way to use a truck to need to have plywood and drywall completely flat in the bed? You know there is more than just construction right?

You do care what other people drive apparently or you wouldn't be here waving around your man card because you are too dense to understand the multitude of different uses people can have for a truck. That's why they are so popular now, you can use it as a family vehicle and still haul furniture, tools, dirt bikes, commercial refrigeration equipment, etc and tow your boat or rv.

And I'm sure that YOU only see women driving around crew cabs, you see what you want to see and based on how ignorant your posts are, I'm not surprised.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

Since my daughter was born, and the need for a crew cab -- I've had double-cabs for years -- became immediately transparent, I've been struggling with getting the CC short or standard bed. In every case where I thought "I need a truck to move this thing", it was immediately clear to me that a standard bed was the better option each time. That being said, I'll be taking delivery of a 2020 crew cab standard bed next week. While I'm slightly concerned about the extra length, I took it on a test drive and really didn't notice any difference in maneuverability from my 2017, so I'll think I'll be fine.

 

And for what it's worth I think the 2014-2018 crew cab short boxes look the best of all the configurations, but 2019+ the crew cab standard bed looks the most 'balanced' to me.

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Ted Turner said:

You got the wrong one jack. I cdon't care what somebody else drives. I just think the crew cab short boxes look funny and aren't nearly as utilitarian. Where I'm from only women and the rich folk drive crew cabs but if that what you like bub by all means it ain't no skin off my back. If you really using the bed in a crew cab the point remains that you would be better off with another vehicle. But it ain't my money. 

Same reason why I have air conditioning. It's there whenever I need it even though I am near the beach where it's been 72 degrees for the past month. Same thing goes for the back seat of my crew cab. It's there when I need it. I've used it to bring office furniture. And I drive it around in crowded areas in Newport Beach, the short box makes it easier. Everybody's different. Not everybody has the space for two cars. It's mostly laid back folks like me who drive crew cabs. Nobody wants the double, it's ugly as ******. Dear God.

  • Like 3
Posted
12 hours ago, loopbacksean said:

Since my daughter was born, and the need for a crew cab -- I've had double-cabs for years -- became immediately transparent, I've been struggling with getting the CC short or standard bed. In every case where I thought "I need a truck to move this thing", it was immediately clear to me that a standard bed was the better option each time. That being said, I'll be taking delivery of a 2020 crew cab standard bed next week. While I'm slightly concerned about the extra length, I took it on a test drive and really didn't notice any difference in maneuverability from my 2017, so I'll think I'll be fine.

 

And for what it's worth I think the 2014-2018 crew cab short boxes look the best of all the configurations, but 2019+ the crew cab standard bed looks the most 'balanced' to me.

I for sure agree ...The proportions of the CC Standard look the best . Not a big fan of the Crew Cab look with the short , all that CAB and a small bed look odd to me but to each his own, everyone has their needs and opinions. NO wrong choice. ( even though i have one , but i will be getting a Standard  bed soon again ) Also dont forget the 19+ now are 157 compared to 153 in the K2's so they look very nice to me even more now 

Posted
21 hours ago, Ted Turner said:

You got the wrong one jack. I cdon't care what somebody else drives. I just think the crew cab short boxes look funny and aren't nearly as utilitarian. Where I'm from only women and the rich folk drive crew cabs but if that what you like bub by all means it ain't no skin off my back. If you really using the bed in a crew cab the point remains that you would be better off with another vehicle. But it ain't my money. 

Please explain how I would be better suited in another vehicle.  I use my short bed to its' fullest extent and I need a crew cab as I am 6'5" and need space for car seats and other adults.  Please tell me another vehicle that would be better for a bathroom remodel one weekend, a trip to the golf course with buddies the next, and a hunt where the extra 10" of bed would cause issues on every creek crossing.  In between there throw in I need a full back seat for people, dogs, kids. Sorry you aren't one of the "rich folk"  or maybe you just don't have enough friends to need a crew cab because of your views that "only women drive them"

  • Like 3
Posted

Just F*&%Yg  stop.

 

If you want to argue about what someone else should or shouldn't drive, start your own g(*&^ *m thread.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just F*&%Yg  stop.
 
If you want to argue about what someone else should or shouldn't drive, start your own g(*&^ *m thread.

You might as well change the title and turn off notifications because your thread had been taken over.. you can thank Ted.
  • Like 2
Posted

I care about how a truck performs and looks are way down on the list. With my 2500 extended cab and standard bed I have as long a wheelbase at 144 inches as I want to have when negotiating trails or even making a U-turn with a trailer in tow. With the standard bed I can drop the tailgate and slide in 4x8 sheets of plywood or sheetrock and also can put in our two road bikes without having to take the wheels off.

 

But I sold my 2011 2500 Duramax on Friday and I found that the vast majority of potential buyers needed a crew cab as any passengers over 5'6" in height were not going to fit in the extended or double cab. I never carry passengers and need the rear seat of my pickups but use a SUV or sedan when this is necessary. The extra cab space is for gear when traveling or groceries that would end up all over the place if put in the bed of the truck.

 

My 2500 had a 36 gallon fuel tank and the GM 1500 trucks have the smallest gas tanks of any 1500 truck and with current regs I cannot replace the factory gas tank with an aftermarket one. To get a 30+ gallon gas tank for a 2021 1500 pickup I need to buy one from Ford or Ram or Toyota. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Wintersun said:

.

 

My 2500 had a 36 gallon fuel tank and the GM 1500 trucks have the smallest gas tanks of any 1500 truck and with current regs I cannot replace the factory gas tank with an aftermarket one. To get a 30+ gallon gas tank for a 2021 1500 pickup I need to buy one from Ford or Ram or Toyota. 

I’m still dumb founded why GM not only has the smallest tank of all major manufacturers but even went smaller on the T1s as compared to the K trucks. We’ll never mind I shouldn’t say dumb founded as I’m sure it was something to do with money. Why not offer a bigger tank as an optional up charge ? Put this up there with the wtf was GM thinking next to the 3 different transmissions being offered in their truck line. 

Posted

LOL everyone knows a real man needs an 8` box for doing truck things.regular box is for mall crawlers.

Posted
41 minutes ago, komodo said:

LOL everyone knows a real man needs an 8` box for doing truck things.regular box is for mall crawlers.

If that was the case GM would lose about 80% of their truck sales. I get it thought 8 foot bed automatically means big D or at least that’s what the long bed guys think ??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,284 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...