Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, romclean1 said:

I did the adjustable 5100s on my 6.2, gain was about 1"  using the 1.1 setting.   I would not do the block, but it all depends on your preference, the Bilsteins improve overall ride performance for sure.   

 

594718024_ScreenShot2020-08-15at9_17_06PM.thumb.png.3b6812f77c8554c950e809b5b4d64edd.png.576954188ee406f2a5723d8a3204cc6d.png

Not knowing much about these shocks, is the 1.1" on the highest setting for these or could you go higher?  Also, the part numbers I found are different than yours.  Any idea why? SKU: 2x24-293297_2x24-293471

Thanks.  Nice truck you got.  Hoping mine will look like that sometime this winter.

Edited by jddealer
more
Posted
17 hours ago, jddealer said:

Anyone put the ride height adjustable Bilsteins on a 6.2L?  Wondering if you have a before and after measurement to see how much it raised the front.  Heard it might not raise it as much a a 5.3L because of weight?  Just wondering if you can get by with putting these on instead of the 2" spacers for a leveling kit and gain the same rise to fit tire sizes that also fit a level.  

 

In my instance, this would be for a High Country

I have a High Country with 6.2l & Max Tow and did these as well, I had one of the 1st sets out earlier this year and they didn't have the adjusted height chart for the 6.2's. Mine are at the middle 1.5 inch or new 6.2 level .9. I only realized they added a new 6.2 chart last week as I was thinking of making some changes and couldn't remember original chart settings. At least I now know why the thing has more rake that I thought it should have, I will be pulling these back out and going to setting 6 or 204903031_19Chevy.thumb.jpg.4d571b48dcad8fbbe37eebd352a67d08.jpg1.9in. Anyway I can take some measurements if you need just let me know.

 

Here's mine with current 1.5in back and .9 in front.

 

Posted
16 hours ago, romclean1 said:

I did the adjustable 5100s on my 6.2, gain was about 1"  using the 1.1 setting.   I would not do the block, but it all depends on your preference, the Bilsteins improve overall ride performance for sure.   

 

594718024_ScreenShot2020-08-15at9_17_06PM.thumb.png.3b6812f77c8554c950e809b5b4d64edd.png.576954188ee406f2a5723d8a3204cc6d.png

Here's the new chart I found last week, this should give you a good idea on lift height settings.image.thumb.png.25e7620d136071ac32161f9dadc646f3.png

Posted

Thanks everyone. Not looking for what height they are now, just how much one can expect these shocks to lift it from stock.  So, with the 6.2L, one can assume a 1.5" lift at the highest setting.

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, jddealer said:

Not knowing much about these shocks, is the 1.1" on the highest setting for these or could you go higher?  Also, the part numbers I found are different than yours.  Any idea why? SKU: 2x24-293297_2x24-293471

Thanks.  Nice truck you got.  Hoping mine will look like that sometime this winter.

Bilstein has separate 5100 front shocks for the TB/AT4 trucks.  They only have 3 settings: Stock, 0.50”, and 1.1” is the highest.

Edited by pewterliftedz
Posted
8 minutes ago, beauso79 said:

I had the GM 2" kit installed at the dealer on my 6.2L and then upgraded the shocks to the Bilsteins (see my post above).    As far as warranty, typically unless the modification is the direct cause of a failure, you're good.  Also depends on the relationship with your dealer in my experience, and how much your modification impacts things.   In this case, changing shocks isn't really a big deal, unless you do something that dramatically alters setup.    if your dealer hates any kinds of modifications, stay clear of them :)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, romclean1 said:

I had the GM 2" kit installed at the dealer on my 6.2L and then upgraded the shocks to the Bilsteins (see my post above).    As far as warranty, typically unless the modification is the direct cause of a failure, you're good.  Also depends on the relationship with your dealer in my experience, and how much your modification impacts things.   In this case, changing shocks isn't really a big deal, unless you do something that dramatically alters setup.    if your dealer hates any kinds of modifications, stay clear of them :)

So, how was the ride with the GM 2inch lift before the Bilstein upgrade? I assume the Ranchos that come in that kit were an improvement over stock

Posted
1 minute ago, beauso79 said:

So, how was the ride with the GM 2inch lift before the Bilstein upgrade? I assume the Ranchos that come in that kit were an improvement over stock

Well it had Ranchos on it already, so there was no noticeable change, the Bilsteins are an improvement for sure.

Posted
20 minutes ago, beauso79 said:

I purchased mine at Summit Racing, after verifying first the right parts on Bilsteins site.   The part numbers are different for Trailboss as pewterliftedz noted above.  Once you install the GM 2" kit, you've effectively made the truck into a trailboss.

Posted
24 minutes ago, romclean1 said:

I purchased mine at Summit Racing, after verifying first the right parts on Bilsteins site.   The part numbers are different for Trailboss as pewterliftedz noted above.  Once you install the GM 2" kit, you've effectively made the truck into a trailboss.

So is that option the ones that have only the settings at stock, 0.5", and 1.1"??  Is that 1.1" over and above the 2" after installing the GM lift? Like 3.1" total?

Posted
17 minutes ago, beauso79 said:

So is that option the ones that have only the settings at stock, 0.5", and 1.1"??  Is that 1.1" over and above the 2" after installing the GM lift? Like 3.1" total?

Yes, I'm at the 1.1 setting which almost levels the truck.  It's pretty hard to tell because the sight lines on the truck are a bit misleading.  The difference is noticeable however, and the truck sits up like a level normally provides. 

Posted
1 hour ago, romclean1 said:

Yes, I'm at the 1.1 setting which almost levels the truck.  It's pretty hard to tell because the sight lines on the truck are a bit misleading.  The difference is noticeable however, and the truck sits up like a level normally provides. 

So here are my original measurements before and after the GM 2" kit.  so it went from 37.5" to 41.25"  so overall I'd say about 3" maybe a touch more after adding the new shocks.

 

1328440066_ScreenShot2020-11-17at2_49_31PM.thumb.png.537160d61603413f08e5bee9bb9c012c.png

Posted
5 minutes ago, romclean1 said:

So here are my original measurements before and after the GM 2" kit.  so it went from 37.5" to 41.25"  so overall I'd say about 3" maybe a touch more after adding the new shocks.

 

1328440066_ScreenShot2020-11-17at2_49_31PM.thumb.png.537160d61603413f08e5bee9bb9c012c.png

Any changing out of the UCA's?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...