Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The gas pedal in a t1 is far enough from the trans that my foot can slide off to the right of the gas pedal. My foot isn’t as easy to rest on the gas pedal.  

Posted

My 14 GMC was the quietest best riding P/U I’d ever owned. It had everything I wanted. I was close to retirement it was going to be around awhile. I thought the six speed was perfect. It had the E-85 option, perfect gearing and I could tune it. My plans included a whipple. I joined this site got familiar with cylinder deactivation and what that involves. That’s sent me backwards to what I drive now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/4/2020 at 4:22 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

I had three girls and a 76 Corvette all five of us rode in. They sat in the cubby and looked out the back window.  But it was not my

 

Point is...it really isn't a space problem...is it?   Nah....I'll keep what I have for as long as I can. 14 grandkids won't put me in a T1 CCSB. 

 

 

I guess you're not familiar with the size of rear facing car seats these days lol. It barely even fits with the front seat all the way up. With what I'm being offered on my trade in and the deals they're giving on trucks my payment will be the same and I will just have to pay on it a couple more years so it's a win win.. If my truck was paid off, I might be more inclined to wait but, I'm being offered like 3-4 grand more than I was 3 months ago..

  • Like 1
Posted

things I miss about my 14

-prefer traditional tailgate handle. Have a hard time getting my tailgate released with the button because tonneau  cover has a bit of pressure on tailgate and sometimes takes 10 tries with the stupid button to get open.  

-14 rode smoother

-14 had a bit softer seats

-14 had actually better lighting with a more effective high beam. 19 looks more modern though

-14 had much better radio FM range 

 

Everything else on my 19 RST is much better. Many feel the interior needs updating, but I find it practical and allot of small improvements were made. Not everything is perfect on my 19 and I would improve a couple things, but I do find the competition is compromised in one way or another as well. 

 

Dan

Posted
On 10/10/2020 at 10:52 AM, TA^Guy said:

Things I wish they had changed.

  • No more mast antenna (really, what's this 1980?  I think this is the only modern vehicle that still has this)

Pretty much all full-size trucks still have a fixed mast antenna. The only one that doesn't is the new-gen Ram. 

Posted

I've had the T1 for about 5 days.. Things I miss on the K2: Power adjust pedals, old school tilt steering wheel, regular tailgate handle (going to look into swapping one from a lower trim truck) seems like a disaster in the making if I hit the button while parked too close to something...  Besides that I do not miss the shitty old 6 speed trans this 8 speed really puts the power down better, I love the dual exhaust on the z71 package, new 4x4 controls make more sense, sport mode is nice, seats fit me better, bigger back seat is def nice on the crew vs double cab!

Posted

I traded in my 2017 LTZ Z71 for my 2020 TB and here's what I miss on the old truck

  • Factory Navigation
  • Power Passenger Seat
  • GM Performance (Borla) Dual Exhaust
  • Better bucket seats.

All the above is washed away on my TB when I stomp on the pedal unleashing the awesomeness of 6.2L of power :)

 

 

  • Like 2
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

Okay just hit about 2000 miles on the 2020 RST 5.3 8speed 4x4 crew cab.

Likes:
Exterior styling
Transmission shifting much better
Crew cab is great compared to the double cab.

Dislikes:
Interior comfort
Interior controls, 4 wheel drive buttons suck, cruise control buttons are just silly.
Driver seating position;
The steering wheel comes out of the dash way to low.
The steering wheel doesn’t have a separate tilt function.
Gauges are cheap looking
Brake pedal is too close to the driver
Power adjust pedals are no longer an option.
Steering wheel is too small in diameter
Arm rests don’t allow one to rest their arm while driving very comfortably IMO. Hoping when I get the center console swap done that this is improved.
Seats bottoms are too small, rounded on the front edges.

Would I do it again? I’d probably buy a low mileage 2018 honestly if used truck prices weren’t so out of control. May look at trading for a Ram. IMO the T1 series is a downgrade in driver comfort compared to the K2 trucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I just turned over 70K on my 19 LTZ. I felt my 18 LTZ rode better and had more comfortable bucket seats.

I do love my 19 in every other way, it seems much more nimble that the 18.

Tom

Posted

My 2018 LT rode better, had better seating, and would idle so smoothly at 500 RPM's it was amazing. It also handled a little better. But, by 3,800 miles had been out of service for 2 different 2 week stretches for a no start condition. The third time with no start and towing to the dealership was it's farewell.

 

At 7,700 miles the 2020 hasn't been towed yet and has not failed to start so I'm ahead there. I'm tweaking the seat position and getting more comfortable and the ride may have something to do with the factory General all season tires vs. the Bridgestone street tires that were on the 2018. The 2020 feels longer and wider.

 

With the current fuel management system I don't know if the 2020 will ever idle like the 2018 did. It seems to be fighting the auto shut off even when I have that turned off. 

 

My left leg instinctively pushes the parking brake even while my finger is on the button for the electric one, so I am still adjusting to that. 45 years of stomping the pedal is a hard habit to break.

 

If I hadn't totally lost confidence in the 2018 after the 3rd breakdown for the same issue, I would still have it.

Posted

My TI is an all around better truck. My K2 had marginally softer seats. Maybe the only thing I miss.

Posted

I would still have my 2018 if I wasn't wrecked at 12k miles.  It was supposed to be a 20 year truck for me and I loved it.  

IMG_7257.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,532 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...