Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

If you are running empty with max tire pressure, especially with 20 inch wheels, that will contribute to a stiff, busy feeling ride quality, especially at low speed, and i don’t think shocks can fix that. You might try adjusting tire pressure if you haven’t already.  I’m running my new 3500 empty during break in at 55 front 60 rear and it is noticeably better than the 60/80 max the dealer delivered it with. I have the camper torsion bar option and 18 inch wheels.  When the 2500 lb slide in camper goes on in a couple weeks I expect the ride will be pretty nice. 
 

I suspect a set of Bilsteins are in my future, though. 

Edited by Another JR
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Regarding my 2020 Chevy 2500HD 6.6L gasser w/ Z71 package, GM has designed an overall muscular and updated HD series truck.  However, their seats are so stiff and the tension on them is similar to a guitar string. So, adding that to the expected HD stiff structure + suspension is a tough package.  In search of a softer suspension alternative before I opt for an air ride seat (probably way too much $$$).  I've yet to try Bilstein shocks but I'm going to try changing my shackles instead to the American Sulastic Shackles (#SA-06). From reviews and such, even the wives report being happier riding in their respective brand of HD truck; happy life is a happy w..e :)).  Anyone else try these Sulastic shackles as an alternative?

Posted

Do not use Bilsteins if you want a softer ride, or you will regret it!  Monroe Sensitracs are a good bet for a softer ride, but I am not sure if they are available for HD pickups.

Posted

agree.....bilsteins while more controlled arent soft....they perform well but arent cushy, just depends on what you want......if stock shocks had some rebound dampening they wouldnt be that bad.....on 1500 you notice it more, on 2500 the stiffer springs make up for shock a bit when empty.....should have kept my 2500 tbh

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/6/2021 at 3:27 PM, MTU Alum said:

The ranchos or base shocks provide you good performance for a twin tube shock.  When you step into a Bilstein or fox you switch to a monotube shock.  A lot these monotubes have more tuning flexibility with end stops, bypasses, etc that help separate primary and secondary ride events that can provide better ride performance without sacrificing handling.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Aren't the Rancho's a monotube shock - I know they are on the 1500 AT4? 

Posted
3 hours ago, Supercup said:

Aren't the Rancho's a monotube shock - I know they are on the 1500 AT4? 

They can be either.  On the 1500s, trail boss and AT4 get monotubes.  The rest of the Z71 trucks are twin tube.  HDs are all twin tube shocks.

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted
22 hours ago, MTU Alum said:

They can be either.  On the 1500s, trail boss and AT4 get monotubes.  The rest of the Z71 trucks are twin tube.  HDs are all twin tube shocks.

 

#iworkforGM 

 

Good to know! 

Posted
On 5/20/2021 at 5:34 PM, RJC Dove said:

Regarding my 2020 Chevy 2500HD 6.6L gasser w/ Z71 package, GM has designed an overall muscular and updated HD series truck.  However, their seats are so stiff and the tension on them is similar to a guitar string. So, adding that to the expected HD stiff structure + suspension is a tough package.  In search of a softer suspension alternative before I opt for an air ride seat (probably way too much $$$).  I've yet to try Bilstein shocks but I'm going to try changing my shackles instead to the American Sulastic Shackles (#SA-06). From reviews and such, even the wives report being happier riding in their respective brand of HD truck; happy life is a happy w..e :)).  Anyone else try these Sulastic shackles as an alternative?

 

I am running the sulastic shackles on my 3500 DRW and it makes it a lot more comfortable empty.  I am still looking for more improvement, mostly because I have the snowplow/camper torsion bars up front.  I would love to swap those to the regular bars and I am thinking about bilstiens, hence the reason I am looking at this thread.  But I would still recommend the sulastic shackles, they really do help. 

Posted (edited)
On 5/26/2021 at 8:11 PM, Dunn said:

agree.....bilsteins while more controlled arent soft....they perform well but arent cushy, just depends on what you want......if stock shocks had some rebound dampening they wouldnt be that bad.....on 1500 you notice it more, on 2500 the stiffer springs make up for shock a bit when empty.....should have kept my 2500 tbh


Wait.. what?? One guy on page 1 said it smoothed out a large bump in the road he normally travels, but 2 guys are saying they are not a cushier ride??

 

I bought B8 5160’s in hopes of improving ride quality on road, should I be returning them??

Edited by Arkangel
Posted (edited)

Bilsteins arent meant to be "cushy" shocks....they favor control and are tuned more for offroad than street.....as well as digressive valving (opposite of progressive)....while not for serious offroad that type of valving is bit stiffer in beginning of stroke vs progressive system...harder you hit something smoother it feels....you really can't have both....no shock will work excellent in both areas so always a compromise.....to what degree, personal needs, and taste depends on the driver....I prefer a progressive shock but didn't want to spend bank on kings......bilsteins do bigger hits well but small chatter on streets not so much....I would probably prefer eibach over them......again it's all preference and only way you'll know what's for you is to ride in a set.....after I burn thru these I will change to a progressive set....am a not huge fan of bilsteins myself...my 20" rims aren't helping either I am sure...but for the price and lift they provide, hard to beat......still relatively a cheap shock so can't expect too much

 

Edited by Dunn
  • 1 month later...
Posted

when you talk about not meant to be  a cushy ride are you talking about the 5100s , 4600s or both.  if you are going to swap from the camper bars id go with the Cognito bars https://www.dieselpowerproducts.com/p-cognito-510-90887-comfort-ride-torsion-bar-kit-2020-gm-66l-duramax-l5p. i might do that someday day.  i was thinking of doing 4600s. 

Posted

Does anyone know what model Rancho shocks come on the 2020 3500 Z71 SRW? Is it a standard configuration or a special GM model?

 

Posted

I have consulted Rancho on this subject. GM installed Rancho shocks are made specifically for the GM trucks and are different than the Rancho products. To find the part numbers, check the ACDelco online catalog or Rockauto. These shocks are sold by  ACDelco.

Posted

I took off the rear Rancho Shocks on my 3500 trucks after the first 500 miles and replaced those with Bilstein 4600 shocks I had from a prior truck.  I definitely noticed an improved ride especially over washboard roads and and had a more planted feel.  Sold the Rancho takeoffs on Craig's List.  Plan to do the fronts as well.   The ride improvement on my 3500 with the Bilsteins on the rear only was less noticeable than on my 2018 2500.  I think that is probably due to the higher spring rates on the 3500.  Not everyone agrees but in my research, I found that the 4600 shocks generally have a lower valving for compression and rebound over the 5100.

 

Bilstein 4600 and 5100 Comparison

 

I recognize that this is just one source but in my prior research I found other similar resources. 

 

  • 10 months later...
Posted

I have a 2500HD AT4 2022 and want to make the ride softer like the 1500 Denali. I've read Bilstein with Sulastic shackle for the rears are good. Someone else mentioned cognito torsion bar. I don't know what that is or with what that will help with. I'm fairly new to 2500HD pickups. I wanted to get feedback or suggestion from you guys as where I live, the dealers that modify cars usually have a preference to specific company brands and all they do is sell sell. Any help from you guys, I will appreciate it.

 

Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...