Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know some folks who ordered AVS shields by model and paint code and they don't fit or color match. Not sure about Weather Tech or the others.

Posted (edited)

Clear paint protection film (PPF) would be much classier on a Denali.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I don't get why they are still called bug shields. Aren't they just for protecting the paint on the edge of the hood?

I'd second the PPF. I kinda wish I would have installed that when mine was new. Now my leading edge is full of little paint chips. GM uses the thinnest coat of paint possible to hold its color.

Posted

What are future plans with the truck though, if it's just a daily driver ,I'm sure it would be fine, but if the Denali is known for that issue wouldn't hurt to be proactive. Seems like AVS has quite a few that would compliment the front end of your truck too.

Posted
59 minutes ago, aseibel said:

GM uses the thinnest coat of paint possible to hold its color.

I think you meant "EPA".

One mustan't dirty the Kings air.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, It's Tim said:

I think you meant "EPA".

One mustan't dirty the Kings air.

 

 

It has nothing to do with the EPA.  It's purely on GM for using the cheapest, thinnest paint they can get away with.  GM got smart and added the rock chip paint at the bottom of the fenders.  Now they need to put something more resilient on the fronts where rock chips happen frequently.

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, TxTruckMan said:

It has nothing to do with the EPA.  It's purely on GM for using the cheapest, thinnest paint they can get away with.  

 

 

I would agree except its not just GM that has this paint issue.  Its most all of the major US automakers.  They are all painting thin because cutting costs, weight and EPA regulations (which have changed paint composition over the years).  

Edited by newdude
Posted

The EPA made everybody switch to non-hazardous paints.  They didn't make them paint it thinner.  That's on the OEMs.

  • Like 1
Posted

I put an AVS aero skin on my truck and wife’s new Traverse. Love them. They lay flat into the hood instead of sticking up like a bug shield. It Protects the front edge of the hood. I like it too because it gives it alittle different look as well. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, shakenfake said:

Yeah non-hazardous paint is thinner...

Yeah right. The EPA made GM use crappy paint and told them they could only use one coat. Lol.

 

What’s the EPA requirement for orange peel?  Because this is the first truck I’ve had in a while that doesn’t have any. But It’s my third truck with this new environmentally friendly paint. GM might not be in compliance. 

Edited by TxTruckMan
Posted
21 minutes ago, TxTruckMan said:

Yeah right. The EPA made GM use crappy paint and told them they could only use one coat. Lol.

 

What’s the EPA requirement for orange peel?  Because this is the first truck I’ve had in a while that doesn’t have any. But It’s my third truck with this new environmentally friendly paint. GM might not be in compliance. 

Orange peel, mine (2021) has a metric ****ton. What’s orange peel have to do with any epa requirement?

Posted
2 hours ago, Dirk13 said:

Orange peel, mine (2021) has a metric ****ton. What’s orange peel have to do with any epa requirement?

Nothing.  Just like paint quality and thickness.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 100% agree, there are a lot of variables. I definitely do not drive I’ve like a grandpa but also don’t drive like I stole it. Truck is currently in the shop so I’ll have to get weight later. The price for driving it doesn’t bother me. My precious was a 6.2l so the cost between the two is a wash. 
    • if you want a short turning radius get a short bed Colorado!
    • that is pretty awesome MPG there!  I think so far one observation is these trucks do way better on MPG under 65mph vs 70+ and they really suffer at 75+   I noticed on the stretches into NE on 76 and 80 which is posted 75MPH and I was doing 82 I was getting more like 13.    
    • No ETA is available for that engine at the moment in the GM system.   I would start at the dealer.  Try and talk to the parts manager or service manager and see if they can start a CX Connect case and get an ETA from GM on when engines may be available.  If they just check Parts Workbench and say "no eta", they aren't trying hard enough.  They need to do a CX Connect and chat with DPAC to find the ETA.      
    • I would have to read back to get a better picture in my mind of some of the other comments and what they were using for a driving scenario they based the fuel mileage off of. That is why the fuel mileage conversation is extremely difficult to make fair comparisons from. If I was to be living in town and only driving around town, light to light and some longer stretches that doesn't have a light every block, and the usual stop at a grocery store and the bank and so on and so forth, my fuel mileage even during the summer time would be so bad with my truck I don't even want to know how bad it would be !. Then add in winter time and idling to warm it up to clear the windows and driving through snowy streets etc, large heavy trucks with gas engines have NEVER been worth crap for fuel mileage and why some little pot licker of a car with wheelbarrow tires and a 1300 cc four cylinder non turbo engine was the ticket to using a mere fraction of the fuel over a full size pickup.    By the way my truck has the 34" tires as its a HC but not the BFG KO3 tires ( that was an option for my truck but the sales guy couldn't figure out what the tires actually were so that never got on the order until it was too late to change the truck order ). So what fuel mileage your getting actually sounds good for "town driving" and with my truck when I go to town the fuel mileage keeps increasing as I get closer to town because it takes quite a while to get the driveline oils warmed up ( and why it always shows better fuel mileage on the return trip from town because its already warmed up ) but once I am in town that fuel mileage average just keeps dropping the more I mess around town and then has to recover back to something reasonable again by the time I get home for an over all average.    I'd be curious what your sticker says for the factory weight of your truck, mine is close around that 7700 lb due to the options it has. But anyway the long and short is, vehicle weight, higher rolling resistance heavy tires and a hefty driveline and a relatively large gas engine make for crap fuel mileage in stop and go scenarios, all one can do is drive it easy off the line at each stop and as my dad had said over the years, drive like a raw egg is under your foot and that's the best one can do. Years back with a carbed engine and if the carb was getting a bit out of tune etc as would the ignition system, the fuel mileage on pickups with larger engines was just awful compared to what your getting. We pay the fuel price penalty for driving HD trucks over some little vehicle, that is the reality. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...