Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Which retrofit is pretty much a plug and play for the Sierra?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I believe the Rigid D series has a mounting kit that some have used here. That kit with the new light above, would be a great street legal and useful fog light. We should move over to the other thread if this is going much further.

 

Silverado guys should check out "Baggedvintera" white truck with the quad Rigid D series lights. http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/156170-led-fog-bulbs-lights/page-26?do=findComment&comment=1540288

Edited by spurshot
  • Like 1
Posted

For those Sierras that have done retrofits, have any of you guys thought of cutting up the oem shroud and pushing the projectors further forward? It seems as if the shrouds deflect our light beam a slight bit and may hinder our projection of light to the sides. I remember reading some where on hidplanet.com that another Sierra owner had a weird light output in a particular spot caused by probably the shroud. Any input from those of you that have done retrofits? I believe he had the fx-r projectors in there but I can not seem to find the thread.

Posted

For those Sierras that have done retrofits, have any of you guys thought of cutting up the oem shroud and pushing the projectors further forward? It seems as if the shrouds deflect our light beam a slight bit and may hinder our projection of light to the sides. I remember reading some where on hidplanet.com that another Sierra owner had a weird light output in a particular spot caused by probably the shroud. Any input from those of you that have done retrofits? I believe he had the fx-r projectors in there but I can not seem to find the thread.

I guess I haven't seen this issue in the threads. This one looks pretty decent. http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/152762-hid-headlight-bulbs-hid-projector-retrofit/page-33

 

ehahypu9.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

So I was discussing with Mike1220, and I have noticed that my 35w HID kit never needed a relay harness. My connection goes like this:

 

stock power -> Ballast (Hylux) -> HID bulb

 

Noticed, I dont have relay, and nothing goes directly to the battery.

 

Anyone with 55W HIDs that did not use a relay? From my experience, hooking up anything directly to the unregulated power source is always a bad idea, and I was surprised that so many of the kits asks the user to use them. I am hoping the ballast has some sort of protection....

 

Many has:

stock power -> relay harness -> ballast -> HID bulb

Posted

Morris,

From what little I've read, the ballasts tend to be voltage variation tolerant. But your comment about an unregulated power source got me thinking. Our whole vehicle is on the battery. Aren't batteries a common method of regulating component voltage in a circuit? I'm not an electrical engineer, just to level set. The alternator output is regulated, usually to something like 14.5 volts.

Posted

I believe the harness is to protect the factory wiring and if not it still does. It also provides a good power to the ballast when DRL is not, so with no capacitor or harness it's not likely yours work as DRL or they should flash. If you have seen what these do to relays over time you would probably want to add a harness so that you know your factory wiring will remain good for the future. Much rather replace that cheaper harness than fix the factory one.

Posted

Spurshot is right. The system is regulated as far as voltage and the current will be limited by hopefully the fuse and not the wire, if designed right. Has anyone measured the draw of one of these systems?

Posted

Thanks for the response guys, but what I meant for the regulated voltages are thr fact that any where I measure under the steering wheel is constantly 11.8 to 11.9. Nothing above 12

 

This makes me think that all the voltages goes through to any components has been protected to prevent over power. But battery will go as hgh as 14.5.

 

So why not take advantage of the regulated safer voltage instead the kits advise to use power directly from battery. My HID kit never asked or needed a relay and it works just fine.

 

Still, i would like to know if anyone did not use a relay for theur HID kits, especially if it was a 55w kit

Posted

Doesn't the harness just help provide extra amperage during startup to help get the bulbs heated up quicker? Also to take the load off of the factory harness

 

Sent while in 'Murica...

Posted

I havent seen how they are physically wired up, I cant say. But i would think that they are not as they are not connected in parallel. Relay is a electrical switch to bridge a connection.

 

Someone used a 55w bulb halogen in the stock conmector, so why would 55w HIDs be more of a problem? Needless to say, HIDs are more effecient, so it draws the 55w at first and the voltage required to run drops after. Take loss in efficiency in the ballasts, take 10-15%, a 5-7 watt difference on top

Posted

The harness is usually because the stock wiring will cause some lower grade HID'S not to light up or flicker

 

Sent while in 'Murica...

Posted

The harness is usually because the stock wiring will cause some lower grade HID'S not to light up or flicker

 

Sent while in 'Murica...

 

I believe the in-rush current of some OEM (good guy) ballasts is higher than some of the laughter market stuff. A high current capable circuit is important to consistant good performance.

Posted

I have two sets of HID'S on my 02. The low beams are hooked to a harness but the fogs aren't. I'm about to install high beams as well. All will be and have been DDM. Have not had a single problem with them and they will continue to get my business.

 

For my 14 I will get two sets of HID'S (lows and highs) through DDM but both will have a harness.

 

LED'S will be used in the fogs due to numerous reports of housings discoloring/ melting with HID'S

 

Sent while in 'Murica...

Posted

what is the best NON HID bulb for these trucks? I want it as close to blue and white as you can get. Does anybody have one they recomend?

Posted

what is the best NON HID bulb for these trucks? I want it as close to blue and white as you can get. Does anybody have one they recomend?

Just saying, if you are looking for a non HID upgrade, then I would look through the non HID thread

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/156233-Halogen-%26-LED-Headlight-Bulb-Upgrades

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...