Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I really wish there was a better option to change out projectors other than to cut the back off the housings.

How hard would it have been to offer HID in the Denali??? Smh.

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't cut the back of the housing, or the headlight lens. Heat up the sealant via oven or heat gun and take the headlight apart properly and reseal. It is fairly simply, you just have to be patient. Google the method, there are plenty tutorials around.

Posted

Hi, I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 2500HD Denali. I began reading this post which is very informative. I'm a little puzzled In regards to 35w vs 55w bulbs. It appears that using 55w bulbs in the fog light housings cause melting issues. I don't plan on changing my fog lights to HID, but I am planning on HID's for my headlights. With that being said, has anyone experienced any melting issues with using 55w bulbs in the headlight housings? Thanks, Ray

Posted

I was told once that 3" and under projector size are useless for 50 watt output and will not be any better than 30 watt and will cause issues such as melting reflectors as mentioned previous. Can any one confirm this? I believe that stock 2014 gm projectors are not bigger than 3".

Posted

Your question will get more experienced responses over on the HID PLANET forum. Just about every 50+ watt user I've read about was using a 3" projector.

Posted

Oh ok thanks will check it out. The weird thing is, i was told this by a salesman trying to sell me a kit. He was either being very honest and didn't want my reflectors to melt or he was an idiot and just told me the 3" stuff to sound good. Either way I'm happy with the 35w i run.

Posted (edited)

It's my perception after reading a bit that the difference in light output isn't huge between 35 to 50 watts. I could be wrong. But I decided to stick with 35w OEM ballasts and the best name brand (not Morimoto) Osram bulbs I could buy for my projector retrofit. I think a good bulb may be as good as some high watt cheap bulb setups, and I like the idea of an OEM ballast and recognized maker bulb. I'm not happy with the Morimoto standard bulb longevity or performance as they age (3-4 months).

 

Here's my choices in my full retrofit plan. Lexus RX-350 non-AFS projectors, Clear lens conversion, Osram CBI bulbs, Matsushita OEM 35w ballasts. I can wire up my own harness to fit my routing.

DSC_2739_zps9e24def0.jpg

Edited by spurshot
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Actual plug and play? Seems cheap for $170

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

It's as plug n play as the rest of HID kits are. That's just all the stuff you would need for it to work on the Sierras. I guess TRS kept getting asked what was needed so they created a Sierra package lol. Edited by Mike1220
Posted

So for the Silverado high beams, do I need the error eliminators or not? Also, do yall recommend a wiring harness for both the high and low beams?

 

Also, I noticed a lot of guys are having trouble with the HID's in the fog lamps. But I also see this is for the round Sierra fog lamps and not the rectangular Silverado fog lamps. Has anyone had trouble with the HID's in the Silverado fogs with it discoloring or melting?

 

Thanks in advance

Posted

So for the Silverado high beams, do I need the error eliminators or not? Also, do yall recommend a wiring harness for both the high and low beams?

 

Also, I noticed a lot of guys are having trouble with the HID's in the fog lamps. But I also see this is for the round Sierra fog lamps and not the rectangular Silverado fog lamps. Has anyone had trouble with the HID's in the Silverado fogs with it discoloring or melting?

 

Thanks in advance

You will not need the error eliminators for the High beams.
  • Like 1
Posted

Installed my 50W Morimoto kit tonight and it looks great. But now I have awful reception for some of the weaker FM stations in the area. Come in clearly when the HIDs are off but just static with them on.

 

Any suggestions? Maybe I need to route the power lead for the wiring harness differently?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

It's my perception after reading a bit that the difference in light output isn't huge between 35 to 50 watts. I could be wrong. But I decided to stick with 35w OEM ballasts and the best name brand (not Morimoto) Osram bulbs I could buy for my projector retrofit. I think a good bulb may be as good as some high watt cheap bulb setups, and I like the idea of an OEM ballast and recognized maker bulb. I'm not happy with the Morimoto standard bulb longevity or performance as they age (3-4 months).

 

Here's my choices in my full retrofit plan. Lexus RX-350 non-AFS projectors, Clear lens conversion, Osram CBI bulbs, Matsushita OEM 35w ballasts. I can wire up my own harness to fit my routing.

DSC_2739_zps9e24def0.jpg

 

Did you bake your lights to get them apart? If so, do you plan on using addition adhesive upon reassembly and what kind?

Posted

Installed my 50W Morimoto kit tonight and it looks great. But now I have awful reception for some of the weaker FM stations in the area. Come in clearly when the HIDs are off but just static with them on.

 

Any suggestions? Maybe I need to route the power lead for the wiring harness differently?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Check and make sure you have good solid ground connections on the HID system. I will see if mine does this, I don't know since I don't listen to the radio.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...