Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, Adam Waters said:

Switch your polarity. I had the same issue too. The clear is negative and the black is positive. They have it indicated on the other end of the plug, a + /-  is shown on there to confirm. Flip them and you should be good. 

 

- Adam 

Thanks, Adam. I'll try that tomorrow and report back. We have 5 hrs of driving tomorrow for a soccer game so it'll be later in the afternoon before I can do anything with it. Thanks again. 

Posted

eeaaa31b50c1f29e612aef94d79eb1b4.jpg
eefe3cda4976c6258b8d85256ff03b9f.jpg

22705ddf2712eccee0eeee3f1ba9be8d.jpg

High beams are crazy bright! I also swapped the 9005 highs to some 9011’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
2 hours ago, cbrsilv15 said:

eeaaa31b50c1f29e612aef94d79eb1b4.jpg
eefe3cda4976c6258b8d85256ff03b9f.jpg

22705ddf2712eccee0eeee3f1ba9be8d.jpg

High beams are crazy bright! I also swapped the 9005 highs to some 9011’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are those hid or LED high beams?  They're crazy bright!

Posted
4 minutes ago, MegaCode360 said:

Are those hid or LED high beams?  They're crazy bright!

They're the md2s bixenon projectors.  I have a splitter on there, so it's a mix of the HID and 9011 halogen bulb.  You can see the yellowish tint from the halogen.

Posted
Thanks, Adam. I'll try that tomorrow and report back. We have 5 hrs of driving tomorrow for a soccer game so it'll be later in the afternoon before I can do anything with it. Thanks again. 
This is totally what it is. Morimoto is stupid for doing this. Lots of us dealers have bitched about this.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Greytrout15 said:

Holy smokes! Dual high beams?! Now all you need is a train horn.

Lol. Had them on my old truck and outgrew them. They were fun while it lasted though. 

Posted
On 3/31/2019 at 9:15 PM, FastWS6TA said:

This is totally what it is. Morimoto is stupid for doing this. Lots of us dealers have bitched about this.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

Thanks Adam and FastWS6TA. I just now got a chance to mess with the lights. I flipped the plug from the headlight to the capacitor link and that fixed it. I disconnected the battery, used a small pick to remove the wires, and reinstalled them opposite of what they were. Thanks again for your help. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/27/2019 at 10:25 PM, FastWS6TA said:

Yes sir. Typically a distortion in the beam pattern is due to bulb position. Really nothing to go wrong with the projector typically. Issues with this type of retrofit are typically:
Bulb put of position or rotated
Bad ballast (doesnt fire)

These issues are not "common", but when there is an issue it would tend to be one of the above. I feel yours is bulb position.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatal
 

Took the front end apart last weekend after I installed my new 2016+ LED tails and got the confidence to touch the bulb. Sure enough, it wiggled in there and could see the beam pattern and the brightness change as it wiggled. Took it apart, backed the locking nut off and got the main nut pushing the bulb into place better and that fixed it. Output is killer now, looks amazing!

 

Thanks for the tip!

Posted (edited)

@FastWS6TA About 2 years ago I bought and installed the Silverado hid kit from trs. I’ve had 3 bulbs go out since then. And 1 ballast. Even trs doesn’t know why. I lost my third and final bulb today so I’m over it...

 

seriously considering the D2S retrofit kit from fast headlights. I did an FXR retrofit in my last truck and loved it. 

 

Couple questions:

 

1) already answered :)

 

2) how do the lens optics compare to the FXR projectors?

 

3) since the D2S projectors are bi-xenon and it looks like the fastheadlights kit included a high beam splitter, do they both flip to high (projector and stock high beam) at the same time? 

 

4) without baking the headlight assembly lens apart, is there enough adjustment of the projector itself to ensure the cutoff is level or do he adapters line it up well?

 

5) general HID height adjustment question. Can anyone refresh my memory? The cutoff should hit what height when parked 25ft from a Wall?

 

i live out in the sticks and am constantly dodging wildlife so I don’t want to blind other drivers but I really want to maximize light output/reach outwards and side to side. I may add some led ditch lights to help if necessary.

 

thanks all!

 

Edited by mr4wdLTZ
Editing questions as I read the thread backwards
Posted
2 hours ago, mr4wdLTZ said:

@FastWS6TA About 2 years ago I bought and installed the Silverado hid kit from trs. I’ve had 3 bulbs go out since then. And 1 ballast. Even trs doesn’t know why. I lost my third and final bulb today so I’m over it...

 

seriously considering the D2S retrofit kit from fast headlights. I did an FXR retrofit in my last truck and loved it. 

 

Couple questions:

 

1) already answered :)

 

2) how do the lens optics compare to the FXR projectors?

 

3) since the D2S projectors are bi-xenon and it looks like the fastheadlights kit included a high beam splitter, do they both flip to high (projector and stock high beam) at the same time? 

 

4) without baking the headlight assembly lens apart, is there enough adjustment of the projector itself to ensure the cutoff is level or do he adapters line it up well?

 

5) general HID height adjustment question. Can anyone refresh my memory? The cutoff should hit what height when parked 25ft from a Wall?

 

i live out in the sticks and am constantly dodging wildlife so I don’t want to blind other drivers but I really want to maximize light output/reach outwards and side to side. I may add some led ditch lights to help if necessary.

 

thanks all!

 

1) Cool.

2) It seems the FXR has a more focused hot spot, which results in a little added distance.  I have the md2s 5.0 and I love them. The fxr requires a lot to fit into the LTZ lights.  Md2s only needs a hole drilled in the cap for the wires.  Easy.

3)Yes, you will have a quad high beam with the splitter if you choose to use it.  I upgraded my 9005 high to a 9011 hir bulb.  A little whiter and puts out more lux vs the 9005.

4) I used the 3d printed brackets from @FastWS6TA in his kit, and the alignment is spot on. 

5)The cutoff should be 2" down from the center of the projector when you are 25' from a wall on a flat, level surface.

 

I thought about adding a light bar behind my grille, but with my retrofit, it is not necessary.  I have also have some Rigid dot/sae fogs that are pointed slightly out for added width. I couldn't be happier.  They have a nice cut off, and are actually street legal.

 

I always had PnP HID's in reflector housings that were pointed down, to avoid blinding traffic.  I absolutely love these lights and how they turned out.    

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, cbrsilv15 said:

1) Cool.

2) It seems the FXR has a more focused hot spot, which results in a little added distance.  I have the md2s 5.0 and I love them. The fxr requires a lot to fit into the LTZ lights.  Md2s only needs a hole drilled in the cap for the wires.  Easy.

3)Yes, you will have a quad high beam with the splitter if you choose to use it.  I upgraded my 9005 high to a 9011 hir bulb.  A little whiter and puts out more lux vs the 9005.

4) I used the 3d printed brackets from @FastWS6TA in his kit, and the alignment is spot on. 

5)The cutoff should be 2" down from the center of the projector when you are 25' from a wall on a flat, level surface.

 

I thought about adding a light bar behind my grille, but with my retrofit, it is not necessary.  I have also have some Rigid dot/sae fogs that are pointed slightly out for added width. I couldn't be happier.  They have a nice cut off, and are actually street legal.

 

I always had PnP HID's in reflector housings that were pointed down, to avoid blinding traffic.  I absolutely love these lights and how they turned out.    

Thank you for the detailed feedback. I ordered the kit and am excited to get it installed. Will post before/after

  • Like 1
Posted



[mention=134157]FastWS6TA[/mention] About 2 years ago I bought and installed the Silverado hid kit from trs. I’ve had 3 bulbs go out since then. And 1 ballast. Even trs doesn’t know why. I lost my third and final bulb today so I’m over it...
 
seriously considering the D2S retrofit kit from fast headlights. I did an FXR retrofit in my last truck and loved it. 
 
Couple questions:
 
1) already answered [emoji4]
 
2) how do the lens optics compare to the FXR projectors?
 
3) since the D2S projectors are bi-xenon and it looks like the fastheadlights kit included a high beam splitter, do they both flip to high (projector and stock high beam) at the same time? 
 
4) without baking the headlight assembly lens apart, is there enough adjustment of the projector itself to ensure the cutoff is level or do he adapters line it up well?
 
5) general HID height adjustment question. Can anyone refresh my memory? The cutoff should hit what height when parked 25ft from a Wall?
 
i live out in the sticks and am constantly dodging wildlife so I don’t want to blind other drivers but I really want to maximize light output/reach outwards and side to side. I may add some led ditch lights to help if necessary.
 
thanks all!
 


Hey there
Sorry I am just seeing your post now. I got your order so thank you for that.! I will answer your questions just the same though.

2.) The lenses optics are very similar. The FXR might have a bit on the 5.0 with width but honestly it is so minimal it isn't worth stressing over. As well, you should always weigh out the cost, performance and ease of install factors. The FXR and 5.0 are similar in cost. Performance is very similar. But the install (as already mentioned) with the 5.0 is 10 times easier than the FXR. In my opinion the scale tips tremendously in the favor of the 5.0 retrofit. Same goes for the Sierra.

3.) Yes. Some ask about getting matching HID bulbs for the high beams but it isn't necessary and isn't recommended. If anything I suggest to get the 2Stroke LED option, but again, not necessary. To be honest you would be fine without the factory high beam as the 5.0 is better anyway. Ha

4.) Adapters will take care of it all. You will retain full adjustment via the factory adjuster.

5.) As already mentioned. 2 inch drop over a 25 feet distance.

Let me know if you have any other questions. Happy to help and your order is ready to roll out too just so you know. ;)



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...