Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

The Nitto G2 285/75r18 is almost a 35" tire! I don't think I have come across anyone running that size with a level. Do you have any pictures of your truck with that tire on it?

Here are some pics. Sorry for the poor quality, they're all I have right now.

With BFGs 305/65r18 and 2" level

With BFGs 305/65r18 and 2" level

with NItto G2s 285/75r18, 2" level + Bilstein 1.75"

Texas City

truck 5

 

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Here are some pics. Sorry for the poor quality, they're all I have right now.

 

Thanks for posting some more pictures. I don't plan on going to a 35" tire like your Nittos, but those 305/65r18 BFGs look killer . I also like how your truck looks "stock but lifted" rather than rims and a bunch of add-ons/mods that kinda mess up the nice clean OEM look.

 

KO or KO2? I assume KO because they were OWL. I don't know if there is any difference in size between the two models of tires. The 305/65/r18 comes in at 33.5 x 12 which I assume is a little smaller once mounted. You are saying that you had them on for awhile and did some off roading and didn't have any contact with the swaybar or trim any inner liner? If I went that size, I think I would have to stay with BFG as I think Nittos run a little fatter and the Toyo Open Country AT2 doesn't come in that size.

Posted

Just ordered the Rough Country 2" level kit, we should hopefully be installing it next week with a bunch of other parts I have to go on

Posted

 

Thanks for posting some more pictures. I don't plan on going to a 35" tire like your Nittos, but those 305/65r18 BFGs look killer . I also like how your truck looks "stock but lifted" rather than rims and a bunch of add-ons/mods that kinda mess up the nice clean OEM look.

 

KO or KO2? I assume KO because they were OWL. I don't know if there is any difference in size between the two models of tires. The 305/65/r18 comes in at 33.5 x 12 which I assume is a little smaller once mounted. You are saying that you had them on for awhile and did some off roading and didn't have any contact with the swaybar or trim any inner liner? If I went that size, I think I would have to stay with BFG as I think Nittos run a little fatter and the Toyo Open Country AT2 doesn't come in that size.

No problem. Thanks! I like the semi-stock look as well! I had the KO, at the time I bought them, they weren't making the KO2 in the size I wanted. There was a slight rub on the rear part of the fender lining on the driver side at full lock (right turn), but it would have been fixed by tying it back. I really did like the look of the KOs and the white lettering, but two of the tires cracked or got cut from mild off-roading.

 

I changed to Nitto G2 for a few reasons:

1- the warranty on a tire this large (50k for Nitto vs nothing for BFG)

2- the price was right (KO2s were pretty pricey)

3- there weren't any of the KOs left in that size (according to Discount Tire)

4- and I added about 1.5" of additional lift and felt the need to fill the extra space with a larger tire!

 

I don't think there is an difference in actual size between the KO and the KO2 if they're said the same size.

 

Looking back after having purchased the 285 Nittos, I wished I would've gone with a little wider tire, like a 295 or 305, because I really liked that look.

Posted

I just ordered the Motofab 2" level kit for my truck -- it didn't ask whether I had steel or aluminum control arms. I suppose it doesn't matter, even though I have aluminum on my Z71.

 

I also ordered BFG TA KO2's, however they are on 2-4 week backorder. I elected for the LT 275/70R18 size.

 

I'm pretty excited to get this in--I am doing the level myself since it's just a simple block under the strut.

 

http://www.motofablifts.com/product-p/ch-2lm.htm

Posted

I just ordered the Motofab 2" level kit for my truck -- it didn't ask whether I had steel or aluminum control arms. I suppose it doesn't matter, even though I have aluminum on my Z71.

 

I also ordered BFG TA KO2's, however they are on 2-4 week backorder. I elected for the LT 275/70R18 size.

 

I'm pretty excited to get this in--I am doing the level myself since it's just a simple block under the strut.

 

http://www.motofablifts.com/product-p/ch-2lm.htm

I was told Jan. 11 for these exact tires. All of his suppliers showed as having zero of this tire, but after he made a quick phone call, found out they are sitting in a warehouse for inventory reasons.

Posted

No problem. Thanks! I like the semi-stock look as well! I had the KO, at the time I bought them, they weren't making the KO2 in the size I wanted. There was a slight rub on the rear part of the fender lining on the driver side at full lock (right turn), but it would have been fixed by tying it back. I really did like the look of the KOs and the white lettering, but two of the tires cracked or got cut from mild off-roading.

 

I changed to Nitto G2 for a few reasons:

1- the warranty on a tire this large (50k for Nitto vs nothing for BFG)

2- the price was right (KO2s were pretty pricey)

3- there weren't any of the KOs left in that size (according to Discount Tire)

4- and I added about 1.5" of additional lift and felt the need to fill the extra space with a larger tire!

 

I don't think there is an difference in actual size between the KO and the KO2 if they're said the same size.

 

Looking back after having purchased the 285 Nittos, I wished I would've gone with a little wider tire, like a 295 or 305, because I really liked that look.

 

Do you think the 285s or 295s on stock rims would fit width wise without rubbing on a RC 2.5 level?
Posted

I'm burned out on reading up on the leveling kits so hopefully someone can chime in an answer...I want to raise the front and still have a slight rake, so Ive narrowed my options to the 2 inch RC level that looks like it ( might ) make it nose high or the bilstein 5100's. How many of you had to install a rear block due to being nose high with the 2 inch level ?

Posted

I'm burned out on reading up on the leveling kits so hopefully someone can chime in an answer...I want to raise the front and still have a slight rake, so Ive narrowed my options to the 2 inch RC level that looks like it ( might ) make it nose high or the bilstein 5100's. How many of you had to install a rear block due to being nose high with the 2 inch level ?

I've got the 2" and still have rake. no additional on the rear either.

 

Here is how mine looks:

 

FCBC4F90-3306-4009-B659-F53C69A213AB_2.j

  • Like 1
Posted

I've got the 2" and still have rake. no additional on the rear either.

 

Here is how mine looks:

 

FCBC4F90-3306-4009-B659-F53C69A213AB_2.j

tyrich88 your rig looks good I was debating on stock wheels with BFG's .

 

I see some pic's with 2 inch levels on here that seem to look a bit nose high,if mine sits like yours Id be happy with it but its almost like a roll of the dice.

Posted

Hey tried to search this but couldn't find an answer. Jus got a 2016 silverado z71 and picked up some 305/50/20 nitto 420s. I'm debating on which wheel I want, anyone running a 20x10 with -24 offset or -44 with just a level?? Or a 20x12 with -44 offset with a level ??

Posted

Do you think the 285s or 295s on stock rims would fit width wise without rubbing on a RC 2.5 level?

285/65r18 : No rub except maybe a little on swaybar.

295/65r18 : Might rub a little on swaybar and liner. Very few tires available in this size.

295/70r18 : Will rub swaybar and liner. Really need 4" total lift for this tire.

 

I'm burned out on reading up on the leveling kits so hopefully someone can chime in an answer...I want to raise the front and still have a slight rake, so Ive narrowed my options to the 2 inch RC level that looks like it ( might ) make it nose high or the bilstein 5100's. How many of you had to install a rear block due to being nose high with the 2 inch level ?

Even if the wheelwells look level, the big hoods on these trucks make the nose look high if you don't put the rear block in. Put 2" up front, and you lose all the rake, at least visually. If you never put anything in the bed, you might like the look, but carry or tow anything, and you will wish you put the rear block in. There are hundreds of leveled pictures on this site and others, so it's a choice you are going to have to make for yourself. Google Images: Leveled Silverado

 

Hey tried to search this but couldn't find an answer. Jus got a 2016 silverado z71 and picked up some 305/50/20 nitto 420s. I'm debating on which wheel I want, anyone running a 20x10 with -24 offset or -44 with just a level?? Or a 20x12 with -44 offset with a level ??

 

I have a friend running a 2015 with that exact tire with the full RC 2.5" level (front and rear) on Fuels 20x10 with 0 offset. He is rubbing the liner bad in reverse lock. You want to push the tire out 1.78" which may help you with the liner rub, but might cause you issues with the fender.

Posted (edited)
285/65r18 : No rub except maybe a little on swaybar.

295/65r18 : Might rub a little on swaybar and liner. Very few tires available in this size.

295/70r18 : Will rub swaybar and liner. Really need 4" total lift for this tire.

 

 

Even if the wheelwells look level, the big hoods on these trucks make the nose look high if you don't put the rear block in. Put 2" up front, and you lose all the rake, at least visually. If you never put anything in the bed, you might like the look, but carry or tow anything, and you will wish you put the rear block in. There are hundreds of leveled pictures on this site and others, so it's a choice you are going to have to make for yourself. Google Images: Leveled Silverado

 

 

 

I have a friend running a 2015 with that exact tire with the full RC 2.5" level (front and rear) on Fuels 20x10 with 0 offset. He is rubbing the liner bad in reverse lock. You want to push the tire out 1.78" which may help you with the liner rub, but might cause you issues with the fender.[/quote

285/65r18 : No rub except maybe a little on swaybar.

295/65r18 : Might rub a little on swaybar and liner. Very few tires available in this size.

295/70r18 : Will rub swaybar and liner. Really need 4" total lift for this tire.

 

 

Even if the wheelwells look level, the big hoods on these trucks make the nose look high if you don't put the rear block in. Put 2" up front, and you lose all the rake, at least visually. If you never put anything in the bed, you might like the look, but carry or tow anything, and you will wish you put the rear block in. There are hundreds of leveled pictures on this site and others, so it's a choice you are going to have to make for yourself. Google Images: Leveled Silverado

 

 

 

I have a friend running a 2015 with that exact tire with the full RC 2.5" level (front and rear) on Fuels 20x10 with 0 offset. He is rubbing the liner bad in reverse lock. You want to push the tire out 1.78" which may help you with the liner rub, but might cause you issues with the fender.

 

Thanks.nice truck! How does your buddy like the RC 2.5 leveling kit? That is what I was thinking about with the 285-65-20s or possibly 275-65-20s on stock rims. Do you think there would be a problem rubbing with either of those two options on stock 20 inch rims from what you could tell by looking at his truck? Thanks again

Edited by Steeks
Posted (edited)

Just ordered 2.5" level with 1.25 rear block and 1.5" body lift. Going to put on 305/55/20 tires and wheels with 18mm offset. Foresee any issues with this setup?

Edited by rhino2020

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,920
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Frank V
    Newest Member
    Frank V
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,225 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...