Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are the differences between the two part numbers?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One is front the other is rear

Posted

Just leveled it this past weekend, much better!

 

RC 2.5" level upfront only.

 

 

post-149698-0-47631200-1456361602_thumb.jpg

post-149698-0-47631200-1456361602_thumb.jpg

post-149698-0-47631200-1456361602_thumb.jpg

post-149698-0-47631200-1456361602_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Thanks. From what I know all I need to level are the front shocks. Which part number are those?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The part number beginning in 24 are the front.

Edited by Imperial91
Posted

Just leveled it this past weekend, much better!

 

RC 2.5" level upfront only.

 

 

What is the specs of tire/wheel size and offset?

Posted

20160222_192920_zpsbqw88wdr.jpg

2015 silverado 2 inch shackles in the rear 2.5 leveling get kit in the front

So you dropped it 2" in the rear and lifted it 2.5" in the front? Why?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

What is the specs of tire/wheel size and offset?

Rims are Method Mesh 17x8.5 0 offset 4.75 backspacing

Tires are Toyo Open Country ATll's 285/75r17

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

  • Like 1
Posted

So you dropped it 2" in the rear and lifted it 2.5" in the front? Why?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Because that's what I wanted. My truck is not a 4x4 so I was not going to level the front past the 39 inches and have it look like a 4x4 when I know it's not. If I'd gotten a 4x4 then I would of just lifted the front.
Posted

Because that's what I wanted. My truck is not a 4x4 so I was not going to level the front past the 39 inches and have it look like a 4x4 when I know it's not. If I'd gotten a 4x4 then I would of just lifted the front.

That makes no sense, your truck just looks broken that nose high

Posted

That's okay if it doesn't make sense to you there's a lot of trucks that don't look right to me but to each their own. I'm not making payments on their trucks.

I simply think there is a misunderstanding. The terminology you are using sounds like you lowered the back of your truck 2" and raised the front 2.5". Is this what you meant to say?

Posted

I simply think there is a misunderstanding. The terminology you are using sounds like you lowered the back of your truck 2" and raised the front 2.5". Is this what you meant to say?

Yeah that's what I did. The truck has a squat it just depends how the picture is taken that makes it look really squatted or very little

Posted

Yeah that's what I did. The truck has a squat it just depends how the picture is taken that makes it look really squatted or very little

OK. I am also curious as to why you'd choose this look. I read your earlier posts and I understand that this is the way you want it to look. A truck that is lowered has a street cruiser appeal. A truck that has a rake looks ready for hauling. A level truck looks aggressive. A truck that is squatted looks compromised or that it is too heavily loaded. This is not a criticism, I am just very interested!

Posted

466_zpsqbicccsu.jpeg

Here's another picture. As to why well I'm from California and here it's a style. What works for us might not work for others and what works for others might now work for us.

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...