Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Dinner said:

I'm calling tomorrow to be sure. 

 

From my understanding from their site and a few others is every 16.5-18 is as follows

 

4WD - Alum spindles & steel arms 

2WD - Iron spindles & steel arms

 

Someone correct me if I've got that wrong... 

I am wrong, slightly. 

 

lovelessjl was right. Alum and stamped share the same ball joints, no matter if it's a alum or cast iron spindle. Belltech said I'm good to go!

 

Struts and shocks are in. Just waiting for the spindles and flip kit. Will post pics when it's done! Thanks for all the help

Edited by Dinner
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I put the transmission spacers in yesterday. The shaking on take off is gone now. DSC_0995.thumb.JPG.95dfaf039c9717d019cb921a04663812.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, qwank said:

I put the transmission spacers in yesterday. The shaking on take off is gone now. DSC_0995.thumb.JPG.95dfaf039c9717d019cb921a04663812.JPG

Whats thr part number. Maybe i should do it to

Posted
54 minutes ago, Nasty said:

Whats thr part number. Maybe i should do it to

6521-774

 

it's literally longer bolts and 4 spacers.  you could probably stack some washers 3/4'' and get the same results.  

Posted

my crew cab got a little more frame clearance over the weekend. the rekles kit is amazing and highly suggested if anyone is looking for a notch. yes i did undercoat the rest of the frame so everyone knows. just did the notch first because it was bare metal and it looked like rain.

 

fMor1Q2.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
Will it work with a 2/4 flip kit? Do you have a part number and how much are you looking to get?

Not sure if someone’s answered you yet, but you can use the McG helper bag kit, you’ll just need to get a 2” airbag spacer from Firestone. That’s what I did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Dinner said:

Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 

Therewill be rubbing for sure

Posted
10 minutes ago, Dinner said:

Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 

Therewill be rubbing for sure

Posted

Need some input ASAP.  I finally pulled the trigger on getting my truck lowered.  I am having a reputable local shop install an Inez 3/5 lowering kit.  The front is looking good, though I am getting some rub.  I thought this might be the case and expected it.  What I didn't expect is that the rear is coming out an 1" to 1.5" lower than the front.  On top of that the shop told me that even with the bump stops completely removed the truck is bottoming out on anything more than a small bump.  The rear was only supposed to drop 5" and apparently it is dropping more than like 7".  The shop installed the flip kit , 1" lift shackles and included shocks.  Anyone have any issues like this with a flip kit?

  IMG_4609.thumb.jpg.b477953a2e48a21e1eed4b6f76e48737.jpg

IMG_4608.jpg

IMG_4607.jpg

Posted
Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 
Nasty is right. I'm running a 305/40/22 which is a 31.5x12 and I have some light rubbing at 4/6

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
Need some input ASAP.  I finally pulled the trigger on getting my truck lowered.  I am having a reputable local shop install an Inez 3/5 lowering kit.  The front is looking good, though I am getting some rub.  I thought this might be the case and expected it.  What I didn't expect is that the rear is coming out an 1" to 1.5" lower than the front.  On top of that the shop told me that even with the bump stops completely removed the truck is bottoming out on anything more than a small bump.  The rear was only supposed to drop 5" and apparently it is dropping more than like 7".  The shop installed the flip kit , 1" lift shackles and included shocks.  Anyone have any issues like this with a flip kit?
  IMG_4609.thumb.jpg.b477953a2e48a21e1eed4b6f76e48737.jpg
IMG_4608.thumb.jpg.2b741d5306592a151869d1728967e054.jpg
IMG_4607.thumb.jpg.905e7735f0134e9440b203114f80f211.jpg
You're definitely lower than 3/5 looks more like 4/7 to me. Here's my truck at 4/6d3947f7050dd3ad5bdc263eb1c0c2757.jpg

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

Running the 4/6 IHC at 5/6 and that looks close to mine running 22's with a 305/45 tire. My rear bottoms out but typically only on speed bumps I take too fast or big dips in our shitty CA roads. 

 

I would verify the shackles they sent just in case. They should be shorter than stock, not longer. If they're longer they probably sent you the 7" rear flip. Hit up Ivan and double-check your order. The flip is the hard part. Swapping the shackles is pretty quick process. IHC are a good bunch of guys and will make it right if something is wrong. 

 

0g0TwPT9bRK5MM-vj3WHI4UU7dioObUIJqcRkfxV

Posted
1 hour ago, UofAZCats said:

Need some input ASAP.  I finally pulled the trigger on getting my truck lowered.  I am having a reputable local shop install an Inez 3/5 lowering kit.  The front is looking good, though I am getting some rub.  I thought this might be the case and expected it.  What I didn't expect is that the rear is coming out an 1" to 1.5" lower than the front.  On top of that the shop told me that even with the bump stops completely removed the truck is bottoming out on anything more than a small bump.  The rear was only supposed to drop 5" and apparently it is dropping more than like 7".  The shop installed the flip kit , 1" lift shackles and included shocks.  Anyone have any issues like this with a flip kit?

  IMG_4609.thumb.jpg.b477953a2e48a21e1eed4b6f76e48737.jpg

IMG_4608.jpg

IMG_4607.jpg

Did you use lift hangets or just a flip kit ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...