Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2016 Silverado LTZ Z71.

OEM GM 20x9 +24 offset wheels. Clear coated PVD Black Chrome.

Nitto Terra Grappler G2 285/55-20.

Bilstein 5100 Ride Height Adjustable shocks on highest setting. No rubbing. No trimming.

Did you do the wheels yourself? Those look amazing!

Posted

After going through all these pages I never could find the setup I went with

 

Bilstien 5100 level shocks up front only. 20x9 with +1 offset fuel coupler. With 275/60/20 Goodyear duratrac tires. Slight rub at full lock. I zip tied the wheel liners back and no more rub.

post-148013-0-16876700-1468330782_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-22610900-1468330789_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-58441400-1468330796_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-16876700-1468330782_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-22610900-1468330789_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-58441400-1468330796_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-16876700-1468330782_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-22610900-1468330789_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-58441400-1468330796_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-16876700-1468330782_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-22610900-1468330789_thumb.jpeg

post-148013-0-58441400-1468330796_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

IMG_5633_zpszeysxwqg.jpg

 

20x10 Hostile Sprocket, -19 offset with Toyo Open Country 33X12.50R20LT rubber. Slight rubbing on full lock on the driver side but not bad. The truck was already leveled when I bought it so I'm not sure the brand, etc but it was sitting pretty high.

 

Thanks to Bigfoot16 for all the help on the offset, etc. I basically copied his setup (haha)

I wish I had known 20x10s with 33 12.5s would fit my truck. Looks dope.

Posted (edited)

 

 

The 285/50/22 would fit easy, especially with a level. But unless you need a E rated tire, I'd probably just go with the 305/45/22. The 305 is less than .5" shorter and a little wider. Probably not noticeable to the naked eye, but is only LT rated so it would be lighter and ride better. If I go with 22s, thats the decision I'd make. The 305 is also quite a bit cheaper than the 285/50/22. Not sure if the extra .5" is worth the price premium.

 

The 285/55/22 would maybe fit on stock wheels with a 2.5" level, maybe need a little trimming or a small BL. It's about the same size as a 275/65/20 and lots of people fit those with just a level.

 

The 325/50/22 would be rubbing all over the place on stock wheels because of the width. Height might clear with a level and BL.

 

 

Thanks, those are perfect. If you get tired of them, I'm in NJ too. I've got a nice set of 305/55/20 Nitto Trail Grapplers and Procomp rims to trade!!!

 

 

 

 

 

When you say 285/50/22 would fit easy, do you mean that it would fit a stock suspension with no leveling? I would be using OEM 22" wheels.

Edited by rtr16
Posted (edited)

I wish I had known 20x10s with 33 12.5s would fit my truck. Looks dope.

I have the same setup (33x12.5 -19) but I have different wheels and tires. That's a good lucking truck!!

Edited by grapedrinkesha
Posted (edited)

I have 20x9 fuel Mavericks +20. Any idea if 33x12.5 will rub too much?

 

I have the same setup (33x12.5 -19) but I have different wheels and tires. That's a good lucking truck!!

Edited by GMC207
Posted

I have 20x9 fuel Mavericks +20. Any idea if 33x12.5 will rub too much?

 

To be honest I'm not 100% but I can say that I didn't rub too bad but still trimmed plastic. With your offset I would think you would clear suspension and would just be rubbing plastic if anything.

Posted

After going through all these pages I never could find the setup I went with

 

Bilstien 5100 level shocks up front only. 20x9 with +1 offset fuel coupler. With 275/60/20 Goodyear duratrac tires. Slight rub at full lock. I zip tied the wheel liners back and no more rub.

Perfect!

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I have a 2016 Chevy Silverado midnite with rough country leveling kit. Will these rims and tires fit 22" Fuel Mavericks w/ 33" Nitto Terra Grappler g2? I have the painted GM mudflaps and dont want them to rub but can a good deal on this setup. Sorry if question has been asked before.

Edited by snowman44
Posted

Need some input please. Im currently running 20x10 -12 on 305/55 Nitto trail with a 5" lift and also added .5" to make it sit level and have more than enough clearence. I am wanting to switch to either Toyo At II's or RT's for my next set but want to run 295/60 instead of 305s. Also for those of you that have AT II's and RT's do the ride quite? The Nitto's make more noise than I want and also rides rough IMO. If I added 5100s would that help with the ride quality???? Thanks!

Posted (edited)

post-157488-0-81130300-1468548804_thumb.jpg

 

click image for full size

 

2" level kit, stock tires, 17" rims

post-157488-0-81130300-1468548804_thumb.jpg

post-157488-0-81130300-1468548804_thumb.jpg

post-157488-0-81130300-1468548804_thumb.jpg

Edited by 15silver
  • Like 1
Posted

 

1. I don't know

 

2. I have the RC 2.5" level and 20x9 0 offset rims with 295 55 R20 tires. The only rub I get is on the driver side in reverse on my mud flap. If the mud flap wasn't there it would clear. Having said that, you'll be fine at 0 offset, and at +14 offset you should have even more clearance. As far as I know, negative offset is where you run into rubbing problems, so going up in offset should give you more room.

 

Jake

You think I would clear with no rubbing at all on or off road, or full crank with +18 295/55r20? I will go 285/55 if I have to but I just want the tires at minimum flush or slightly poked from fenders and I am worried 285 at +18 offset won't poke and I think 295 would just overall look better.

Posted

Does anyone have any pictures with a 4" lift with 20x10 (offset around -6 to -24) or 20x12 (same offset) and 33's?

 

I've searched a lot and having a hard time with this exact setup.

Posted

You think I would clear with no rubbing at all on or off road, or full crank with +18 295/55r20? I will go 285/55 if I have to but I just want the tires at minimum flush or slightly poked from fenders and I am worried 285 at +18 offset won't poke and I think 295 would just overall look better.

 

yes you should clear easy. At 0 offset my 295's poke out about an inch. +18 will probably exactly even with the wheel well I'd guess. you could always get spacers if you're not happy with the stance

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...