Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Found this on their website. I would call and confirm with them about wheel figment before ordering the kit if you do decided to pull the trigger.  This is their leveling/control arm combo kit but it uses the same control arms. 
11132FED-B5CF-4925-8C1E-A7D1947595EE.thumb.jpeg.a4c863dca1616c14e6588fd31a3ab9a5.jpeg
I would be pretty leery of putting on wheel spacers I had them on my Sierra for a while and it was impossible to get the wheels properly balanced and ended up taking them off

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted

So I raise the shock perch to the third highest setting over the weekend and I'm now sitting at just under 38 in on both sides, and at 40 in the rear with Cooper AT3 275 70 r18's (39psi)

So then drove from Dallas to Houston and before I even got halfway there I literally found myself getting nauseous from the vibrations as I feel almost everything as I drive the truck certainly feels more planted when going down a country road then on the second setting but hit any kind of bump or expansion joint on a bridge and the impact is enough to make the headlight Shake, music playing over an SD card pauses for 3 seconds, like back in the day when you hit a bump in your CD player with skip.

I'm not sure what to do at this point as the second lowest setting does not provide enough rebound but the 3rd setting seems as harsh as the fourth. The front end of the truck literally bunny hops going over a Walmart speed bump at 5 miles an hour.

Is anyone else struggled with finding a happy medium between the 2nd and 3rd snap ring perch's?

I've also noticed that the front driver side is now anywhere between a quarter and a half inch lower than the passenger side

000e1ad27436a7837c746681aee0fec0.jpg307690ddcf248fd32f5c046717b44613.jpg2407c051b5697d6f2cdf09a195f18eb7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted

Zasker, I guess I’ll find out if I have the same thing. I’ve had my truck on the 2nd ring from bottom for the last 1500 miles. I pulled them yesterday and just picked up the springs after having a shop move it to the 2nd highest setting. Your experience has me a little freaked out!

Posted
16 minutes ago, Zasker1 said:

So I raise the shock perch to the third highest setting over the weekend and I'm now sitting at just under 38 in on both sides, and at 40 in the rear with Cooper AT3 275 70 r18's (39psi)

So then drove from Dallas to Houston and before I even got halfway there I literally found myself getting nauseous from the vibrations as I feel almost everything as I drive the truck certainly feels more planted when going down a country road then on the second setting but hit any kind of bump or expansion joint on a bridge and the impact is enough to make the headlight Shake, music playing over an SD card pauses for 3 seconds, like back in the day when you hit a bump in your CD player with skip.

I'm not sure what to do at this point as the second lowest setting does not provide enough rebound but the 3rd setting seems as harsh as the fourth. The front end of the truck literally bunny hops going over a Walmart speed bump at 5 miles an hour.

Is anyone else struggled with finding a happy medium between the 2nd and 3rd snap ring perch's?

I've also noticed that the front driver side is now anywhere between a quarter and a half inch lower than the passenger side

000e1ad27436a7837c746681aee0fec0.jpg307690ddcf248fd32f5c046717b44613.jpg2407c051b5697d6f2cdf09a195f18eb7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm embarrassed, i don't know how many settings there are :loser:

 

What i do know, is the shop set mine one click from the top setting ... I enjoy perfect harmony (lol) at this setting with the 275x65x20 BFG KO2 setup

 

Your Mileage May Vary of course

 

- but at highway speeds the ride is smooth, truck tracks nicely and is very responsive + comfortable 

Posted
Gentlemen,
                I've read about 4 pages and realized there is just way too much on here to read it all. I'm a little confused, I have a 2018 1500 Z71 midnight edition. I'd like to fit 33's, so I was going to level my truck using one of the kits online. From what I gather, its possible to do this using the Bilstein adjustable 5100's? Where is everyone buying these?
 
Cliffs anyone? Sorry for the laziness but 112 pages man, holy hell.


From mid 2015 GM switched our Upper Control Arm (UCA’s)to stamped steel, leveling them causes our tires to get closer to the UCA’s.

You may rub going from 32’s to 33’s. With my 2.25” up front and added 1” to the rear, I had to buy new custom wheels with different offset and now my 285/60/20’s fit

Switched from stock wheels to custom +1 offset wheels
5ce5dc7fa06e7e7b216133cd1030e1bf.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Now I’ve got Nitto Ridge Grapplers
51eccb1d4bd012b44c545b7510a3710e.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
12 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

 


From mid 2015 GM switched our Upper Control Arm (UCA’s)to stamped steel, leveling them causes our tires to get closer to the UCA’s.

You may rub going from 32’s to 33’s. With my 2.25” up front and added 1” to the rear, I had to buy new custom wheels with different offset and now my 285/60/20’s fit

Switched from stock wheels to custom +1 offset wheels
5ce5dc7fa06e7e7b216133cd1030e1bf.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Well my plan is to get 20x10 -19 wheels with 33x12.50 Ridge Grapplers and the Bilstein kit.

 

Where is everyone buying their bilsteins? 

Posted
 
Well my plan is to get 20x10 -19 wheels with 33x12.50 Ridge Grapplers and the Bilstein kit.
 
Where is everyone buying their bilsteins? 


4wheelparts has awesome deals on 5100’s. Be careful though, going into 10 wide very much limits fitment due to the wider tire and has caused lots of headaches with rubbing issues and that’s why I went with 9 wide, zero issues. My CST lift is scheduled 9 days from now and interesting how much requirements there are prior to suspension modifications. I never thought I’d ever do a lift until the positives outweighed the very little negative and BOOM [emoji95], here I am.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Drove mine to the alignment shop this morning after moving from the 2nd to 3rd setting and I feel no difference in roughness. 

Posted
7 hours ago, z71skywalker said:

 

Well my plan is to get 20x10 -19 wheels with 33x12.50 Ridge Grapplers and the Bilstein kit.

 

Where is everyone buying their bilsteins? 

 

 

Somewhere in there must be a "thank you" to everyone for helping answer your call to offer Cliff Notes from this thread ... and to take the time to offer sensible choices.

 

 

+1 to TXGREEK posting regarding the 9" vs 10" wheel width option. Hey if you can make it work, without a lift, we hope you post photos with honest feedback about rubbing and required alterations to your suspension. 

 

Personally, If there was anything I'd change regarding my setup it's the tire width (10.8") ... but to "get" one apparently has to "give" and I wasn't interested in a lift on this truck, I already have a lifted short-distance vehicle in our lifted Jeep.

 

 

IMG_0321 2.jpg

IMG_1794.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

While digging for a photo of our Jeep (oooh shoot, this is SO off-topic) ... well I came across the Jeep Pickup prototype truck.

 

It's just ... it's just ... it's just lovely to me. 

 

(wiping tear from my eye now) ...

 

 I really love this truck, especially in a diesel powered mode.

 

I apologize in advance for my shameful off-topic diversion :smash: 

IMG_0623 2.jpg

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

18 LT Z71. After 500 miles I see why people hate the Ranchos.  

 

What I'm confused about is everyone agrees that the Z71 rides rough.  I feel all the road imperfections and bumps make the truck shudder.  What I don't get is everyone agrees the Bilsteins are firmer...how is that better?  I stuck with P rated 275/65r18s to maintain a good ride. 

 

If I went Bilstein I'd go with the 1.25" lift up front (I've read is more like 1.5" lift).

Posted (edited)

 

We all know “ride” is difficult to describe, and “firmness of ride” is subjective I suppose.

 

If l were forced to answer your question - I would try to convey the difference as:

 

Bilstein offers a more sophisticated, “taut” “firm-yet-flexible “response to uneven terrain under the tires vs a “jolt” or “shudder.”  

 

Personally, I’m not someone who usually switches a suspension from stock0 (except our Jeep project + lift) but I promise I’ll go down this Bilstein path again with our next truck - regardless of the truck brand. It’s worth every penny to me to switch struts. 

 

Oh, also I mis-spoke earlier about the cost of the 5100’s ... 

 

4 wheel parts invoice enclosed...

 

 

 

EE916BB8-E10C-49D2-9B95-87CB43AC0F9A.jpeg

Edited by Oregon_GMC1500
Posted
On 11/2/2018 at 2:55 PM, Zasker1 said:

I have almost and identical set up to you except I'm running the Cooper 275 70 r18 and I'm curious if you like the handling I just adjusted my bilsteins from the second to the bottom to the 3rd setting and driving to Houston yesterday I found myself getting carsick from the constant vibration it just seems like setting to is too soft and there's not enough rebound in setting 3 it is a brutal ride

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I have had 3 rigs with 5100's all of them on the 3rd setting. I tow a boat alot or I'd do the 4th. The ride is awesome from the 5100's! I would say something is wrong if you notice a big difference in ride between the 2nd and 3rd notch. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Bro, you still got that truck? I'm not seeing any m rust or flaking, which rusted metal flakes. Everyone thinks the wax "is rusty" but it absorbs its surrounding environment, creating a hard, natural shell that you can literally shoot with a bullet and won't flake off. It'll last 50 years like that as long as the barrier isn't compromised by getting in a wreck or meets a chemical that disolves wax. My 09's frame is even duller looking than that, and is holding up better than my rockers or 3rd set of painted shocks. 
    • No.   That would be an LT and higher trim.  Passive entry.  There would be a little button on the door handle and you can program it to proximity lock or unlock.     WT and Custom do not get this feature.  
    • Mediocre, how much did they lose on the poorly conceived EV strategy?   I wonder how much the stock price is being 'inflated' by all the buy-backs?   Cadillac literally looks like a brand without a rudder, no clear goals or product direction - performance or luxury? I guess performance because we can throw a small block in whatever we can and call it a day. Certainly not luxury when a Denali or High Country is reasonably cross shoppable. The Celestiq - no way - no vehicle can command quarter million prices when something wearing the same badge is on the buy here pay here lot across town.   Notice the 'base' Escalade doesn't even come with the 'leather-appointed' seating surfaces.   Hummer EV - fail Silverado EV - fail Sierra EV - fail Bolt/Volt EV (The most successful EV cancelled, restarted, cancelled, whatever its current status it)   Hybrids - none Sedans - none Medium duty - not anymore Minivan - none Coupe - none Convertible - none CUVs - 20+/-   6.2 Recall that landed squarely on the GMs highest seller - and specifically the fattest margin higher trims of the Yukon, Escalade, et. al. The most critical product line they fumbled big time. In the Escalade segment, are those buyers forgiving GM for a bad engine and patiently waiting for the fixes and dealing with the headaches? Nope, they dump them and go straight to the other premium brands.   In the ENTIRE GM portfolio how many aspirational vehicles are there? Corvette, Escalade (quickly being superseded by the obvious better value Denali)...   I posted somewhere else... what if Cadillac left the luxury game and became a performance brand similar to AMG or (gasp) Ferrari? Cut all the entry-level and base models from their line up and focus on the V-series or Blackwing or whatever they call it now. Of course, those would have the pre-requisite luxury and technology as standard equipment. This opens the floor for Buick to step in/up as the luxury brand (like they are in China), no 'performance pretenses' get rid of the 'entry-level' models with equally 'entry-level' power trains and become the Maybach to Cadillacs AMG. With those two brands effectively out of the way Chevrolet, the 'entry-level' brand has the floor to itself and GMC can take over as 'professional grade'.    Now each brand has a focus, no in-fighting, clear direction, and customer targets.   Just need to sneakily slide Corvette into the Cadillac brand and dump the vestigial script writing.
    • I can't get enthusiastic about the 1.5T (or the 1.3 or the 1.2), I won't drive a CVT. But the stupid things sell in volume.
    • There is a big difference in motorcycles and vehicles - nobody needs a motorcycle, they WANT one. That WANT is the most powerful force to drive price upwards.   I've hated every iteration of the Equinox, a prime example of GM laziness. It excelled at absolutely nothing, barely competitive by every metric. At least the latest generation looks decent.    I want to like the Buick Envista, but that pitiful engine plus FWD only is a BIG NO for me, I don't care how good it looks.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...