Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Move Over said:

 


I used mine and there is about a 1/2 gap so my truck is not resting on them. My truck is also not harsh so i don’t see a reason to remove them - they had about the same amount of gap with stock shocks too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Also I don't think mine is harsh around town, only on the highway does it have some harshness /bounce.  

Posted
So, just a quick question as much for my curiosity as anything... I have a 2.25" ProComp level installed that uses 2 pieces.  Would it be better to install 5100s in the stock position and keep the pro comp level or install the bilsteins at max lift and add the bottom 1/4" spacer from the procomp kit?
 
 

This is the same lift I had before my 5100’s. I took the top spacer out, put 5100’s at max higher and kept the bottom spacer in. The shop told me the angles are MUCH better and I shouldn’t see any problems from excessive wear. This combo plus the 2” block out back gave my truck the stance of a 2500 with some added altitude that will still fit in most parking garages.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

This is the same lift I had before my 5100’s. I took the top spacer out, put 5100’s at max higher and kept the bottom spacer in. The shop told me the angles are MUCH better and I shouldn’t see any problems from excessive wear. This combo plus the 2” block out back gave my truck the stance of a 2500 with some added altitude that will still fit in most parking garages.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks!

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Posted

Has anybody seen any updates in regards to the release of the 6112's?  Last e-mail I have from Chas at MRT Motorsports on 11/8/2018 stated that he met with Bilstein at SEMA but they could not give them an ETA and that their production line has been severely backed up for the last 4 months.

 

I'd really like to get the 6112/5160 combo for my truck once I am ready to buy new wheels.

 

Has there been any talk of Bilstein releasing the 8112's for our trucks?

Posted
Has anybody seen any updates in regards to the release of the 6112's?  Last e-mail I have from Chas at MRT Motorsports on 11/8/2018 stated that he met with Bilstein at SEMA but they could not give them an ETA and that their production line has been severely backed up for the last 4 months.
 
I'd really like to get the 6112/5160 combo for my truck once I am ready to buy new wheels.
 
Has there been any talk of Bilstein releasing the 8112's for our trucks?


No and no


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Give up on the 6112's

The news about them came out in 2015.

Funny thing is you can buy them for the Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban but not our 1500 trucks.

Posted
On 12/11/2018 at 8:37 AM, BbyDgital said:

Has there been any talk of Bilstein releasing the 8112's for our trucks?

I talked to a tech at Bilstein a few months ago, and he assured me they will make them for our trucks.  Of course, after the 6112 delay I won't be holding my breath.  Looks like a fantastic shock though, the Toyota guys are raving about them.  Hopefully they'll be available before my truck qualifies for antique license plates....

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sierra Dan said:

Give up on the 6112's

The news about them came out in 2015.

Funny thing is you can buy them for the Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban but not our 1500 trucks.

They also make them for the 2007 to 2013 GM half tons

Edited by Yondu
Posted (edited)

OK, 120 pages into this thread and I've lost myself in all the details. Hoping I can get someone to confirm/deny a few things before I pull the trigger on a set of 5100 shocks.

 

Getting ready to put new shocks on my 2015 GMC Sierra SLT w/Z71 package. Currently has the factory Rancho Shocks at about 63k miles. I'm also running BFG KO2's in a 275/55/20 size. This is the worst riding GM I've owned, beating out the somewhat lowered '06 Tralblazer SS I had, as well as the '00 S10 that you couldn't roll a coke can under the frame. I'm suspecting it's the stiff Rancho shocks, and the stiff KO2 tires. I'm not going to change tires until these wear out, so shocks are next on the list.

 

I don't want to lift/level at all, but like the reviews of the 5100 shocks. Can someone confirm these part numbers for me to make sure I'm getting the right ones?

 

Fronts = BILSTEIN 24238304

Rears = BILSTEIN 33238319

 

Also, I remember reading somewhere that there was a less expensive alternative to these if you didn't want a lift/level. I've lost that link or info somewhere along the way. Can anyone comment on an alternative Bilstein part number that will ride the same as the 5100's, but don' t have the height adjustment on them?

 

Finally, can anyone recommend a reputable source to purchase from? Amazon appears to have them in intermittent stock, and Rock Auto only has a single of the fronts left in stock. Those are my two "go to" sources for online parts.

 

Thanks in advance!

Edited by 2kwik4u
Posted (edited)

You can go with Bilstein 4600s for no lift, but the valving is different and the 5100s are supposed to ride better.  

 

For tires, you could go with a 275/60r20 if your wheels are stock offset.  The .75" front lift would ensure there are no clearance issues.  I'd definitely make sure you do not get LT tires.  Goodyear makes a Duratrac P rated tire in 275/55 and 275/60 - the 60 will ride a tad better. If you want a aggresive tire.  

 

I finally threw some sand bags in the back of mine to fix the highway bounce.  70lbs behind each wheel well did the trick.  

Edited by Yondu
Posted
1 hour ago, Yondu said:

You can go with Bilstein 4600s for no lift, but the valving is different and the 5100s are supposed to ride better.  

 

For tires, you could go with a 275/60r20 if your wheels are stock offset.  The .75" front lift would ensure there are no clearance issues.  I'd definitely make sure you do not get LT tires.  Goodyear makes a Duratrac P rated tire in 275/55 and 275/60 - the 60 will ride a tad better. If you want a aggresive tire.  

 

I finally threw some sand bags in the back of mine to fix the highway bounce.  70lbs behind each wheel well did the trick.  

Thanks for the info.

 

Most likely will go with 275/55/20's again on the next set so I don't have to monkey with the speedometer and being off (even your suggested sizes aren't off by much). I've had my eyes on the Continental A/T tires. I run Continentals on everything else I own with wheels (including the Cannondale, excluding the lawn mower), and like them. The BFG's were on the truck when I bought it, and have been wearing well. Probably a year or two left in them at this point.

 

I also run around with 200lbs of sand in the bed. 100lbs on each side behind the wheel well. Tried U-Bolts, clamps, and a few other things to get the 75mph shake to go away. Sand was the cheapest and easiest. Been considering having some steel plates cut at the shop to bolt to the frame back there so I don' t have so much sand in the bed, just haven't gotten around to it.

 

Bought the truck when I was commuting 6 miles one way. Changed jobs and am now 28 miles one way with lots of interstate, and a fair amount of business travel thrown in as well. The highway shake, and super rough ride are getting old quick, but I love the truck otherwise.

Posted

I think you will like the Bilsteins.  They have a firm ride like everyone says, but they're an improvment over the Ranchos. 

 

It's funny I also considered bolting something more permanent into the rear so I don't have to explain why I have sand bags in the back or a 4wd truck, especially in the summer.  I feel the Bilsteins helped a little with the bounce on the highway, but then I threw 210lbs back there and when I got on the highway sighed and said - finally. I've since taken 1 bag out and moved the two a little further back.  

 

I have 275/65r18 tires, Goodyear Duratracs. I don't put a lot of miles on so I wanted a more aggressive tire.  If I ever upgrade it would be a 275/60r20 in a Duratrac or Trail Runner. 

Posted
18 hours ago, Yondu said:

You can go with Bilstein 4600s for no lift, but the valving is different and the 5100s are supposed to ride better.  

 

For tires, you could go with a 275/60r20 if your wheels are stock offset.  The .75" front lift would ensure there are no clearance issues.  I'd definitely make sure you do not get LT tires.  Goodyear makes a Duratrac P rated tire in 275/55 and 275/60 - the 60 will ride a tad better. If you want a aggresive tire.  

 

I finally threw some sand bags in the back of mine to fix the highway bounce.  70lbs behind each wheel well did the trick.  

from what I understand, its the same shock, just ones yellow, ones silver, and the 5100's allow the lift. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Yondu said:

I think you will like the Bilsteins.  They have a firm ride like everyone says, but they're an improvment over the Ranchos. 

 

It's funny I also considered bolting something more permanent into the rear so I don't have to explain why I have sand bags in the back or a 4wd truck, especially in the summer.  I feel the Bilsteins helped a little with the bounce on the highway, but then I threw 210lbs back there and when I got on the highway sighed and said - finally. I've since taken 1 bag out and moved the two a little further back.  

 

I have 275/65r18 tires, Goodyear Duratracs. I don't put a lot of miles on so I wanted a more aggressive tire.  If I ever upgrade it would be a 275/60r20 in a Duratrac or Trail Runner. 

Sounds like the 5100's are the way to go. Would I just leave them on the lowest setting, or is there a "middle setting" that results in no lift/drop?

 

My biggest complaint with the Ranchos is the "bounce" after the hit. Most noticeable on sharp edged bumps like expansion joints and things like that. It's almost as if there is NO rebound damping, and only bound damping. Hit the bump and there is a noticeable procession after the initial hit. Feels like there are 3-4 more oscillations in the suspension before it comes to rest. The low shaft speed damping seems OK as the truck doesn't float or bounce excessively, but the high shaft speed damping is off and makes the truck to stiff overall.

 

With any luck the 5100's will cure some of that. I'm nervous on going to a P tire as I tow a LOT in the summer. 2 trips a week on average to the lake with a 5,200lb boat, 4 people, coolers, etc. Don't want to get a set of tires that tow "squishy". Had P tires on my '03 Yukon, swapped to LT tires and the towing got much better immediately.......I'll go read some other threads on that though :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...