Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Tomorrow, I’m taking off the monotube Ranchos and putting on Bilstein 24-238304 height adjustable in front at stock level and leaving the Rugged Off Road level kit installed, and installing the Bilstein 5100 33-238319 in the rear.  The stock Rancho monotubes are terrible.  2200 miles with the Ranchos is all I could take.  

Edited by jimbrown1
  • Like 1
Posted

Motofab CH-1R

 

I ordered it on Amazon for $54.99. 

 

They call it a 1" rear leveling kit, which is deceiving, at least to me. I almost ordered the 2" figuring they meant a 2" block. I wish they just sold them by block size and let the user determine what the result would be. It's my understanding that stock block in newer models is 1 1/4". If you pull the stock block and replace with a 2", you should receive 3/4 inch of rear lift.

 

To be honest, I also looked at the 5160. $200 more than the 5100. $280 if you like those billet aluminum clips at $40 a pop.

 

If I drove a fair amount of washboard roads or off road, it would be worth it to pay an extra $200 minus the clips. I'm 99% paved roads and they have the same plumbing, valving minus the reservoir. 

 

Suspension's are good investments, but where do you stop and it starts adding up. I still need wheels and tires. 

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Red_5 said:

I was planning on 6112s up front and 5160s out back. I like the idea of a slight lift in the rear, do you have a part number for the block you're planning to use?

See above.

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, jimbrown1 said:

Tomorrow, I’m taking off the monotube Ranchos and putting on Bilstein 24-238304 height adjustable in front at stock level and leaving the Rugged Off Road level kit installed, and installing the Bilstein 5100 33-238319 in the rear.  The stock Rancho monotubes are terrible.  2200 miles with the Ranchos is all I could take.  

You have the kit that mounts at the bottom of factory strut? What are you getting 2"? I'd be interested to see or hear what UCA 's look like after this. If I was you, I'd reference mark of even snap a before and after phone pic. I thought of spacers, Bilstein warns against. Lots of guys have spacers and 5100 adjustables and say it;s great. 

 

Assuming your getting 2" , 5100 at Max is roughly 1.75. I called Bilstein and only asked about 3rd and 4th setting ride and he insisted that it's designed to have the same ride and maintain a correct UCA angle. I should note this has been disputed by others back and forth. 

 

The best answer is from a guy that kept his current wheels and tires and just swapped struts. Majority of people are doing the level at shops and changing wheels and tires in one shot to benefit from lift/level. Some going from P rated to LT, larger rims, different offsets. You can easily increase even tire weight 50% by small change from stock P rated 20" to a LT with conservative 33" tire . Lots and lots of variables. 

 

That big stamped UCA comes into play if you get to aggressive with lift, offset or wheel size. Good luck with the new Bilstein's. Hope it works out great whichever way you go. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Pivot said:

You have the kit that mounts at the bottom of factory strut? What are you getting 2"? I'd be interested to see or hear what UCA 's look like after this. If I was you, I'd reference mark of even snap a before and after phone pic. I thought of spacers, Bilstein warns against. Lots of guys have spacers and 5100 adjustables and say it;s great. 

 

Assuming your getting 2" , 5100 at Max is roughly 1.75. I called Bilstein and only asked about 3rd and 4th setting ride and he insisted that it's designed to have the same ride and maintain a correct UCA angle. I should note this has been disputed by others back and forth. 

 

The best answer is from a guy that kept his current wheels and tires and just swapped struts. Majority of people are doing the level at shops and changing wheels and tires in one shot to benefit from lift/level. Some going from P rated to LT, larger rims, different offsets. You can easily increase even tire weight 50% by small change from stock P rated 20" to a LT with conservative 33" tire . Lots and lots of variables. 

 

That big stamped UCA comes into play if you get to aggressive with lift, offset or wheel size. Good luck with the new Bilstein's. Hope it works out great whichever way you go. 

Yes, the Rugged off road kit are bottom mount spacers.  I've been running the kit right after I bought the truck and had put 50 miles on it along with LT 275/60/20 BFG All Terrain TA KO2 tires and stock 20" wheels with no rubbing at all.  The angles after installing the level kit were close to stock based on pics I took and kit raised the front end to be within a 1/4" of the rear height so it is totally unnoticeable in difference, almost level.  By running the Bilsteins at stock height I should just get the better ride without any difference in height from what I have today.  I am looking forward to getting rid of these so called monotube Rancho shocks.

 

Here's a link to the kit I had installed at my local All Out Off Road shop in the Houston area. 

https://www.ruggedoffroad.com/product-page/2007-2017-chevy-silverado-gmc-sierra-1500-6-lug-2-0-leveling-kit

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, jimbrown1 said:

2200 miles with the Ranchos is all I could take.  

Amen Jim!

 

 

Posted

Mine are getting installed today.  Can't wait to pick it up and drive it.

  • Like 2
Posted

Well folks I have had a build up of anticipation in reading these threads about the Bilstein's.  I will only say they have so far exceeded expectations.  The dampening is just so much better than the Rancho's, much less bounce in every setting I drove in today.  They do seem to keep the truck much more stable when taking on the road.  I was only able to hit some thoroughfares up to 55 or so and drive the bumpy busy streets that I travel and it was night and day.

 

Cannot wait to get them off road and see how they feel in that scenario as well.  Putting the Ranchos on CL tomorrow.  Maybe I can get someone to buy them.  Bottom line..... money well spent. 

 

Just do it, don't wait. 


4W

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, 4weight said:

Well folks I have had a build up of anticipation in reading these threads about the Bilstein's.  I will only say they have so far exceeded expectations.  The dampening is just so much better than the Rancho's, much less bounce in every setting I drove in today.  They do seem to keep the truck much more stable when taking on the road.  I was only able to hit some thoroughfares up to 55 or so and drive the bumpy busy streets that I travel and it was night and day.

 

Cannot wait to get them off road and see how they feel in that scenario as well.  Putting the Ranchos on CL tomorrow.  Maybe I can get someone to buy them.  Bottom line..... money well spent. 

 

Just do it, don't wait. 


4W

The ride with the Bilsteins is so much better.

 

 

Edited by jimbrown1
  • Like 1
Posted

Has anyone used these on a 2wd with the black shocks? Im about ready to level mine with the 5100s but wonder if it really improves the ride that much. Mine doesn’t seem to ride as bad as the ranchos. 

Posted
On 5/22/2019 at 5:24 PM, jimbrown1 said:

The ride with the Bilsteins is so much better.

 

 

How is the ride in the BFGs?....any complaints?

Posted
29 minutes ago, TheGreatOne said:

How is the ride in the BFGs?....any complaints?

No complaints.  Ride is much more controlled and I’m very happy with my setup. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Has anyone used these on a 2wd with the black shocks? Im about ready to level mine with the 5100s but wonder if it really improves the ride that much. Mine doesn’t seem to ride as bad as the ranchos. 
Mine is a 4wd but had non-Rancho black shocks. My big complaint was large bumps & dips like speed bumps at slow speeds or big undulations at high speeds, the wheels would leave the ground on the rebound (or if they didn't that's what it felt like).

I don't know if all the black shocks are valved the same as the OEM sites list dozens of different part numbers.

The difference after changing to 5100s was day & night for the front end, not saying they are like a serious off road shock, they just work & ride like any decent vehicle should do, swallow bumps rather than crashing over them.

The difference in the rears was not as noticeable for me but I'd rather have everything matched.


Sent using Tapatalk - 2014 5.3 WT

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I’ve read and read... now my head hurts!

 

on a stock 2018 Z71, that I assume has the control arms everyone hates, if I install the 5100’s on highest or next to highest setting, with a 33” tire (275/60-20) will I have any rub? 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
I’ve read and read... now my head hurts!
 
on a stock 2018 Z71, that I assume has the control arms everyone hates, if I install the 5100’s on highest or next to highest setting, with a 33” tire (275/60-20) will I have any rub? 
 
 
Yes from what i read that is true. If you go taller than 33" tires U WILL RUB. Any taller lift you will need new UCA's and a bonified suspension lift. At least 2k for all that.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,654 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...