Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking to purchase the 6112 set for my 2015 High Country.  However, whenever I enter the 6.2L engine size on Bilstein's website the 6112 series does not show up (even though it does for the smaller engine).  BattleBorn's website reports " This Part Will NOT Fit Your 2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 HIGH COUNTRY 8Cyl 6.2L"

 

Can anyone verify these should fit?

 

Also, is there a 5100 set that includes springs?

 

Where I'm attempting to purchase but I get that warning message: http://battlebornoffroad.net/bilstein-new-products/bilstein-6112/47273702/i-7531506.aspx

Posted
12 hours ago, Eneerge said:

I'm looking to purchase the 6112 set for my 2015 High Country.  However, whenever I enter the 6.2L engine size on Bilstein's website the 6112 series does not show up (even though it does for the smaller engine).  BattleBorn's website reports " This Part Will NOT Fit Your 2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 HIGH COUNTRY 8Cyl 6.2L"

 

Can anyone verify these should fit?

 

Also, is there a 5100 set that includes springs?

 

Where I'm attempting to purchase but I get that warning message: http://battlebornoffroad.net/bilstein-new-products/bilstein-6112/47273702/i-7531506.aspx

Do you have magnetic ride? If you have traditional strut and springs they should work, i have a 2015 LTZ 6.2 and installed these a couple months ago with no issues. Hit battle born up on Facebook if you want a quick answer. 

Posted

I can verify that the part # you have is correct. I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 High Country with the 6.2L motor. Motor doesn't impact part #. BSN-47-273702 is the 6112 part # for 2014-2018 Silverado 1500's. 

 

Part # for the 5100 series monotube = BSN-33-238319.

 

The 5100 does not come with Coils. I used the part # above for the rear. 

 

Posted

I have got another question that may have already been answered.

 

I have a complete stock 2014 5.3l with the z71 offroad package.

 

Do I need the BILSTEIN 24186636 B8 5100 ( Rear; For Rear Lifted Height: 4" )

 

or do I need the

 

BILSTEIN 33238319 B8 5100 ( Rear; For Rear Lifted Height: 0-1")

 

As I don`t know if the z71 contains any lift or not.

Posted
1 hour ago, movario said:

I have got another question that may have already been answered.

 

I have a complete stock 2014 5.3l with the z71 offroad package.

 

Do I need the BILSTEIN 24186636 B8 5100 ( Rear; For Rear Lifted Height: 4" )

 

or do I need the

 

BILSTEIN 33238319 B8 5100 ( Rear; For Rear Lifted Height: 0-1")

 

As I don`t know if the z71 contains any lift or not.

no lift on stock truck w z71

  • Thanks 1
Posted

For those of you who have 2WD with the OEM black shocks how would you compare the ride to 5100s? I'm at 75k miles and would LIKE to get 5100s but something tells me I don't NEED them likely until 100k. I mostly drive highway but get my teeth shaken out over bumps because im leveled..

Posted

Hey guys, not sure if this has been asked yet, I searched and didn’t really find any info. My front 5200’s just showed up, but the have no boot on them and no spring perch. as in the photo. from what I’ve seen I know we reuse the stock coil, and I’m pretty sure we reuse the stock spring perch I just thought they’d come with some type of snap ring “converter” for our spring perch. Also it seems like the shroud inside our stock coil spring covers the section of the shock that a boot would. Is that maybe why ours (part number 24238304 for stock height adjustable) doesn’t come with a boot?
c0c984155d4ab58249c4d42790647174.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
22 minutes ago, slide187 said:

Hey guys, not sure if this has been asked yet, I searched and didn’t really find any info. My front 5200’s just showed up, but the have no boot on them and no spring perch. as in the photo. from what I’ve seen I know we reuse the stock coil, and I’m pretty sure we reuse the stock spring perch I just thought they’d come with some type of snap ring “converter” for our spring perch. Also it seems like the shroud inside our stock coil spring covers the section of the shock that a boot would. Is that maybe why ours (part number 24238304 for stock height adjustable) doesn’t come with a boot?
c0c984155d4ab58249c4d42790647174.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I received exactly what you pictured when I ordered 5100’s. There should be a clip that goes around the rings on shock body. You reuse stock spring, upper and lower perch / mount. 

 

I re used stock strut shaft nut and stock lower shock nuts. The supplied bilstein strut shaft nut was not as deep as stock nut and I had a banging in front end on bumps after a few months using bilstein nut. If you look at stock strut shaft nut, threads are at the top and space at bottom so it won’t bottom out on threads. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok thank you, I’ll check it out. And yes the snap ring is already on the shockbody at the stock height setting. [emoji1360]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
36 minutes ago, slide187 said:

Ok thank you, I’ll check it out. And yes the snap ring is already on the shockbody at the stock height setting. emoji1360.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Make sure you get truck aligned if installing on anything other than stock setting.

 

I put mine on 3rd notch from bottom for 1.75" of lift. Truck drove fine but TOE was way out and would have chewed tires. Got it aligned and 5,000 miles later tire wear is even.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks. I have heard that’s needed if lifting/leveling with these. I’m actually planning to stay stock height. But got the 5100’s so I have the option later. I’m planning on getting these in and driving for a little bit with the $h!tty SRA’s that came with it before I get the new tires I want so if there are any issues I work them out on the old tires haha. Also my dealer recently gave me an alignment for free (under the warranty) as we were diagnosing a thumping and it turned out to be these stock tires (shocker) but they were pretty cool about it. They actually drove it. Heard the thumping, did a rotation, noted that the thumping moved to the back, and then checked the alignment and saw that it was a little off, maybe even enuff to cause odd wear so they fixed it and did all of that under warranty. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I was baffled. Haha

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted

Purchased my 2014 Sierra 4WD a month ago, was already leveled unknown kit. The oem Ranchos were garbage and worn. I installed the Bilstein B8 5100s after reading this thread. Set at highest setting, removed the lower level and kept the top of strut level piece installed. Upgraded to 2” rear blocks and measures dead level 40.5” all around. Installed the shocks on the rear bolts down with the sticker reading correctly. Rides great and planted. Also put on 285/55/22 Nitto Ridge Grapplers. 

E45AACBD-95D0-4D81-AA86-124EE4C7E300.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, jwtero said:

Purchased my 2014 Sierra 4WD a month ago, was already leveled unknown kit. The oem Ranchos were garbage and worn. I installed the Bilstein B8 5100s after reading this thread. Set at highest setting, removed the lower level and kept the top of strut level piece installed. Upgraded to 2” rear blocks and measures dead level 40.5” all around. Installed the shocks on the rear bolts down with the sticker reading correctly. Rides great and planted. Also put on 285/55/22 Nitto Ridge Grapplers. 

E45AACBD-95D0-4D81-AA86-124EE4C7E300.jpeg

perfect stance, good looking truck!!

Posted
Purchased my 2014 Sierra 4WD a month ago, was already leveled unknown kit. The oem Ranchos were garbage and worn. I installed the Bilstein B8 5100s after reading this thread. Set at highest setting, removed the lower level and kept the top of strut level piece installed. Upgraded to 2” rear blocks and measures dead level 40.5” all around. Installed the shocks on the rear bolts down with the sticker reading correctly. Rides great and planted. Also put on 285/55/22 Nitto Ridge Grapplers. 
E45AACBD-95D0-4D81-AA86-124EE4C7E300.thumb.jpeg.bee04d3d4121ec273a0b898ee518e1ec.jpeg
Thats a good stance.

Sent from my SM-G955U1 using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,047 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...