Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

164 Pages in this thread later and looking for opinions.

 

Looking to replace the shot Z95 Magneride suspension Front & Rear; in my '16 Sierra Denali CrewCab 4x4 6.2L with a 2" lift.  Why does the Bilstein website not have any search results for the 2016?

 

Rancho, Bilstein, other?

Posted
6 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

Was the $100 charge with the units on the truck? If so that is not bad.

Also, did you get an alignment?

 

Unfortunately, that is with them off the truck. It was an urgent need (timing of the essence) so I sucked it up. Also, Bay Area, California prices are out of this world relative to the rest of the nation usually. 

 

It's done and installed. 

 

I didn't get alignment. I'm debating whether I will. If alignment is $150 at the dealer but new tires are $1200/set. I'd have to expect that I get 25% more life out of my remaining tires to break even on ROI. I'll have to get alignment with new tires as I'll be getting a different tire size the next time I need tires so I'd have to fork up that amount again at that point. I don't foresee getting an additional 25% out of these LS2 tires--nor do I really care to. As it is, I haven't rotated them in the last 13K miles. 

Posted

I got my truck back after installing 5100s all around.  Rides very good to me.  Front shocks are set at full height.  The new shocks seem to soak up the big bumps very well.  I agree with what others have posted about still feeling small road imperfections like expansion joints.  I do not believe the small bumps are any worse than my OEM ranchos with 77,000 miles on them.  I feel like the small bumps are on par or slightly better than the OEM shocks.  I am happy with the 5100s at their price point.

 

I need to snap a few pictures.

Posted
23 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

Great review. Thanks!

 

Thanks!

Now I have a few pics from the morning I picked her up. Truck needs a bath but that is a constant battle lately with the dust. 

 

8C9E0060-5382-426C-9705-ECB7227F7E6E_zps

 

762BF164-8D21-41F5-8F6F-A8336615FEA5_zps

 

8F0191D4-92A9-425B-B7B2-3AA74D41FF58_zps

 

0A7E4AE1-2303-4C07-98A3-3A098BCD61B4_zps

  • Like 1
Posted
Thanks!
Now I have a few pics from the morning I picked her up. Truck needs a bath but that is a constant battle lately with the dust. 
 
8C9E0060-5382-426C-9705-ECB7227F7E6E_zpstk119mk3.jpg
 
762BF164-8D21-41F5-8F6F-A8336615FEA5_zpsncuocnhh.jpg
 
8F0191D4-92A9-425B-B7B2-3AA74D41FF58_zpsrbmchquw.jpg
 
0A7E4AE1-2303-4C07-98A3-3A098BCD61B4_zpsieobyp76.jpg
Nice!

Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk

Posted
2 hours ago, mbatzel14 said:

Thanks!

Now I have a few pics from the morning I picked her up. Truck needs a bath but that is a constant battle lately with the dust. 

 

8C9E0060-5382-426C-9705-ECB7227F7E6E_zps

 

762BF164-8D21-41F5-8F6F-A8336615FEA5_zps

 

8F0191D4-92A9-425B-B7B2-3AA74D41FF58_zps

 

0A7E4AE1-2303-4C07-98A3-3A098BCD61B4_zps

Looks good! What size tires? 

Posted

Still waiting on my 6112' from Battle Born Offroad. Ordered on 8/6. Was told a few days ago (20th) that they are expected to ship on the 28th. They are a little miss leading with the shipping. The webpage says they have 105 in stock  but please allow two weeks for shipping. Well I'm looking at three weeks and trying not to get frustrated about it. 

Posted
On 8/21/2019 at 4:21 PM, Gixxer188 said:

164 Pages in this thread later and looking for opinions.

 

Looking to replace the shot Z95 Magneride suspension Front & Rear; in my '16 Sierra Denali CrewCab 4x4 6.2L with a 2" lift.  Why does the Bilstein website not have any search results for the 2016?

 

Rancho, Bilstein, other?

Because your truck has magneride. If you put Bilstein's in you will have to get some sensor bypass plugs to avoid error codes.  

 

 

I wouldn't get rid of Magnerides for Bilstein's.  JMO

Posted

Just installed the 6112's on the front and 5100's on the rear. Did the rears myself, got 4wheelparts to do the fronts on the highest setting. Seem pretty good so far! I disagree with some people who say "night and day difference" but they do soak up the big bumps more easily and the truck seems more stable. Truck is still ever so slightly higher in the rear but other than that leveled out.

Posted (edited)
On 8/24/2019 at 1:21 PM, Yondu said:

Because your truck has magneride. If you put Bilstein's in you will have to get some sensor bypass plugs to avoid error codes.  

 

 

I wouldn't get rid of Magnerides for Bilstein's.  JMO

Yes.  The same was true of the wife's Tahoe LTZ which I swapped over to Passive from the Active Z55 with the rear air option.

My question is still the same but let me ref-phase it.  For those have had the Z95 Magneride, and have swapped it from an Active to a Passive suspension setup; What did you go with?

Edited by Gixxer188
Posted
On 8/23/2019 at 10:32 PM, BowHunter1 said:

Still waiting on my 6112' from Battle Born Offroad. Ordered on 8/6. Was told a few days ago (20th) that they are expected to ship on the 28th. They are a little miss leading with the shipping. The webpage says they have 105 in stock  but please allow two weeks for shipping. Well I'm looking at three weeks and trying not to get frustrated about it. 

I was in the same exact position as you with Battle Born Offroad.  I ended up cancelling my order because they kept providing different ETAs each time I got in contact with them.  Very frustrating for sure.

Posted
4 hours ago, Gixxer188 said:

Yes.  The same was true of the wife's Tahoe LTZ which I swapped over to Passive from the Active Z55 with the rear air option.

My question is still the same but let me ref-phase it.  For those have had the Z95 Magneride, and have swapped it from an Active to a Passive suspension setup; What did you go with?

I have a z71 and went with bilstein 5100s. They're better in some ways but a kind of jarring ride, pretty stiff. I run standard load 275/60r20 tires at 32 psi.  I'll be swapping the setup out for 285/70r17 tires in the next few weeks for a better ride and if that doesn't give me what I want, CST coilovers.  I haven't used the CSTs so I can't in good faith recommend them as an improvement yet  They cost considerably more but I'm tired of my stiff ride.  

  • Like 2
Posted
On 8/26/2019 at 1:40 PM, Yondu said:

I have a z71 and went with bilstein 5100s. They're better in some ways but a kind of jarring ride, pretty stiff. I run standard load 275/60r20 tires at 32 psi.  I'll be swapping the setup out for 285/70r17 tires in the next few weeks for a better ride and if that doesn't give me what I want, CST coilovers.  I haven't used the CSTs so I can't in good faith recommend them as an improvement yet  They cost considerably more but I'm tired of my stiff ride.  

It’s true about the trade off. I’ve gotten used to the stiffer ride but overall, the handling has improved. The rear end is more planted and thus I have much less wheel spin/chirping when making a turn from a stop or on an off camber. 

 

Im happy with it but it is definitely more rough riding. I miss the smooth sailing over the tar strip and the like but when I hit a big bump or rough terrain while in a turn, I’m glad to have the 5100’s. 

 

Overall, I’d say it was worth it for what I was seeking. I bought a truck expecting a truck ride. If I wanted the caddy feel, I’d kept it stock. Maybe some progressive shocks vs digressive would be better for those who want a more comfortable, yet compliant ride.  

Posted (edited)
On 8/23/2019 at 7:32 PM, BowHunter1 said:

Still waiting on my 6112' from Battle Born Offroad. Ordered on 8/6. Was told a few days ago (20th) that they are expected to ship on the 28th. They are a little miss leading with the shipping. The webpage says they have 105 in stock  but please allow two weeks for shipping. Well I'm looking at three weeks and trying not to get frustrated about it. 

I ordered mine in the middle of July and have called multiple times. They aren't answering my calls anymore and haven't responded to my email inquiries.  I'm not sure what the note means they added to my order on 8/20. Getting about ready to dispute the charge.

 

image.png.d817f306fa605533082213e51ce2a731.png

Edited by Eneerge

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...