Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK.......no worries....I'll keep my ear to the tracks here and see how it shakes out.......Thanks. It's not the end of the world if it doesn't happen it's just that this thing is so wide in the mirrors that I am finding many occasions where the power fold would come in handy.

Posted

OK.......no worries....I'll keep my ear to the tracks here and see how it shakes out.......Thanks. It's not the end of the world if it doesn't happen it's just that this thing is so wide in the mirrors that I am finding many occasions where the power fold would come in handy.

What year is your truck ? Model ? Trim ? Etc

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Whoa......I was with you right up to the pcm involvement........

On the Vehicle Acceptability for Retrofit chart, it discloses that some vehicles would require a BCM and/or Memory Module Calibrations in order to have full functionality... especially for Seat Memory functions, memory recall, reverse tilt, etc.

 

It hasn't been clear to me on what these calibrations actually do. The members that I have helped successfully have not needed either calibrations. I am still not sure on what the calibrations do since the harness modifications I perform merely moves the lighting circuits around to match the mirrors that you change from/to.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi I have 2015 gmc sle crewcab with 5.3. Was wondering if i could upgrade to towing mirrors without changing any harnesses.Truck has dl8 option.I have a chance to buy towing mirrors of a chevy ltz.As long as heated and power would work,that is fine by me.

Thank You.

  • Like 1
Posted

Posting this to clear up my previous posts.

 

I think I solved the mystery I was having. The two harnesses I swore were 23342727 and 23342716, are really parts 23342726 and 23342714. I caught this looking at the pin out when it finally sunk in to me.

I did order 23342727 and 23342716 but got the wrong harnesses some how. I got one box with both harnesses and the part number on box was all together different as I recall. I guess this is a big slap in my face for not catching the part numbers even after I looked at them probably 10 times and still not catching it. Yes, you can say it, I am a big dumb arse.

 

Look forward to the harnesses pgamboa is sending and for him bailing me out here.

 

Thank you all who jumped in to help, it was most appreciated.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Hi I have 2015 gmc sle crewcab with 5.3. Was wondering if i could upgrade to towing mirrors without changing any harnesses.Truck has dl8 option.I have a chance to buy towing mirrors of a chevy ltz.As long as heated and power would work,that is fine by me.

Thank You.

Changing mirrors will require changing the harnesses if you want lighting to work. If you only care about Power adjust and heat; you should be fine. But why not add the lighting?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by pgamboa
Posted

Posting this to clear up my previous posts.

 

I think I solved the mystery I was having. The two harnesses I swore were 23342727 and 23342716, are really parts 23342726 and 23342714. I caught this looking at the pin out when it finally sunk in to me.

I did order 23342727 and 23342716 but got the wrong harnesses some how. I got one box with both harnesses and the part number on box was all together different as I recall. I guess this is a big slap in my face for not catching the part numbers even after I looked at them probably 10 times and still not catching it. Yes, you can say it, I am a big dumb arse.

 

Look forward to the harnesses pgamboa is sending and for him bailing me out here.

 

Thank you all who jumped in to help, it was most appreciated.

All good! I haven't worked on those harness part #s yet so I would still be curious on how they are pinned.

 

Also excited for results of my custom harnesses.

 

Thanks for updating!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Changing mirrors will require changing the harnesses if you want lighting to work. If you only care about Power adjust and heat; you should be fine. But why not add the lighting?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I guess the extra cost of hardware and labour versus just plug and play will be the deciding factor.

  • Like 1
Posted

I guess the extra cost of hardware and labour versus just plug and play will be the deciding factor.

If you are a DIY kind of guy, I have a "kit" with the pre-terminated wires. Comes with instructions to add the lighting circuits yourself. Lower cost alternative to getting the Plug and Play Harness. PM if you want more info.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

If you are mechanically inclined, it should only take about an hour each side to do the DIY kit. Pgamboas instructions are super clear and helpful. Absolutely worth every penny.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

For those that are curious on the work involved with the harness modification, I've created and uploaded a Time Lapse Video of the process. The original post has been updated and the video link is at the bottom. Here it is as well.

 

Enjoy!

 

https://vimeo.com/206759420

Edited by pgamboa
  • Like 7
Posted

My truck has the DL8 mirrors. If I wanted to switch to tow mirrors with the lights working but no power fold what all do I need? Obviously mirrors, but what do I need for wiring? Full harness or just the DIY kit? Or nothing?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

My truck has the DL8 mirrors. If I wanted to switch to tow mirrors with the lights working but no power fold what all do I need? Obviously mirrors, but what do I need for wiring? Full harness or just the DIY kit? Or nothing?

If you did nothing, you would only have Heated and Mirror Adjust. If you get my custom harness, you will gain turn signal, Cargo Lamps, and Park Lamps. If you get Towing Mirrors with power Fold, you will gain power Fold (requires fold switch 23154702). This would be Plug and Play. Remove your existing harness, install my custom harness.... and you'd be done.

 

If you are a DIY kind of person, you can get my DIY Kit. The will include all you need to modify your existing harnesses. This involves unwrapping the harness, inserting the pre-terminated wires, rewrap. The time lapse shows the process of harness modification.

 

Let me know if you need anymore info.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by pgamboa
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...