Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/13/2018 at 10:47 AM, diyer2 said:

Gee whiz, another problem GM motor, like the other brands don't  have problems also.

 

I feel for the owners of problem vehicles but the fact remains they all build a bad one now and then.

 

If there were posts from the owners of non problem vehicles this site would be many times it's size.

 

I also believe the way a vehicle is used and maintained is a huge factor that needs to be included in the equation but is hard to track.

 

I guess I'm luckier than the buyers of new vehicles because I've never had any major problems with my used vehicles all my life.

 

:)

 

 

 

Agreed 100%

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/15/2019 at 5:33 AM, Doublebase said:

"What i tend to see in these trucks is the following...

Leaking Condensers

Leaking radiators 

Actuator stuck in 4wd

Oil consumption

Starter motor failure"

For that Actuator, is it bad to leave the truck in auto 4x4 then?  Majority of the time I leave it in auto, but I really only need 2wd until winter comes.

Posted
5 hours ago, DeathByNissan55 said:

For that Actuator, is it bad to leave the truck in auto 4x4 then?  Majority of the time I leave it in auto, but I really only need 2wd until winter comes.

Yeah I’d put it back into 2wd for sure.

Posted

thats dumb, why even have an auto mode then haha

Thanks for letting me know, i'll be changing that on my way out of work today.

 

Truck came off the shipping truck with a check engine light on *facepalm* taking it into dealership and having whatever is wrong fixed under NY state lemon law.
Has some minor electrical issues too.  But it looks BEAUTIFUL....discovered it has a 100mph gov though ?

Posted

Search cam phaser failure Ford or Ram.

 

The governments  want fuel efficient engines.

 

This is just how it is.

 

They use high tech solutions this adds parts and increase the potential for issue.

 

 

Posted

Just took mine in for the second time this year to get half the rods and lifters replaced ?? Its a '15 high country, and I only have around 30k left on the warranty. I'm thinking it may have to go soon unless I find a reasonable explanation of why this keeps happening and a surefire way to fix it. Any ideas? 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I had pondered the thought of purchasing a new $60k+ GMC Sierra 6.2, but after talking with some GM mechanics and reading these GM truck forums, I’ve yet to do so. I just keep plugging along in my 1999 5.3 Silverado Z71 with 320K on the odo and no engine/tranny issues whatsoever, and a REAL throttle cable, not this DBW electronic bullshit. Original paint, no rust, just normal wear & tear parts replaced due to age. Luckily, I was able to save $$ by replacing most of the parts myself vs $120 an hour rate. 

 

These modern 6.2 engines are total junk and that includes the 5.3 as well. When I was at a local GMC dealership browsing new trucks, there were 3 fairly new trucks in the garage bays for lifter failure, one of which was catastrophic engine failure. All were covered under warranty, but now you own an unreliable POS. I guess it’s just brand loyalty these days that keeps the buyer coming back, even if it’s junk. More scarier than that was what a salesman told me that day: “It’s HP & displacement that sell a truck.” Oh well, when that day does come, “crate motor, here I come!” 

Edited by Patrick 1971
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Capt Bob said:

Horseshit.

Wait, that's it. Buy a horse.

I applaud you to have a 99 with no rust and issues. That same truck in Nova Scotia would be in the bone yard many moons ago although there maybe the exceptions but I haven't seen them. I have a 17 High Country 6.2L bought new and I'm doing everything so it won't rust with yearly undercoating and module since new. So far so good it's like new yet underneath no rust. As far as powertrain Amsoil from front to back since new with a catch can also deleted AFM. Crossing fingers to get many years out of the old girl.

Posted
5 hours ago, Patrick 1971 said:

I had pondered the thought of purchasing a new $60k+ GMC Sierra 6.2, but after talking with some GM mechanics and reading these GM truck forums, I’ve yet to do so. I just keep plugging along in my 1999 5.3 Silverado Z71 with 320K on the odo and no engine/tranny issues whatsoever, and a REAL throttle cable, not this DBW electronic bullshit. Original paint, no rust, just normal wear & tear parts replaced due to age. Luckily, I was able to save $$ by replacing most of the parts myself vs $120 an hour rate. 

Not everyone wants to drive some brokedick truck.  DBW is vastly superior to cable throttles for traction/stability control and throttle tuning.  

 

I had a 2002 Avalanche North Face Edition for 10 years, same basic setup as your '99.  Plenty of rust issues (especially brake lines and eventually fuel lines).  I replaced it due to not wanting to worry about problems towing on long vacation trips; leaking fuel line and broken exhaust weld on a single trip, replacing a wheel hub assembly in a Wendy's parking lot on a different trip.  Not a confidence builder.  Had it strand me with a dead fuel pump at 85k miles.  I'll take my chances with my new truck.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nitrousbird said:

Not everyone wants to drive some brokedick truck.  DBW is vastly superior to cable throttles for traction/stability control and throttle tuning.  

 

I had a 2002 Avalanche North Face Edition for 10 years, same basic setup as your '99.  Plenty of rust issues (especially brake lines and eventually fuel lines).  I replaced it due to not wanting to worry about problems towing on long vacation trips; leaking fuel line and broken exhaust weld on a single trip, replacing a wheel hub assembly in a Wendy's parking lot on a different trip.  Not a confidence builder.  Had it strand me with a dead fuel pump at 85k miles.  I'll take my chances with my new truck.

And a qualified driver will do better than any of the nanny-aids.  I still daily my '84 GMC that doesn't have a spec of rust anywhere, and isn't garaged up here in upstate NY.  It isn't hard to keep a truck from rusting, it just takes a little effort.  It's been NY-FL a few times, and will be going back down in a few years when I build another house.

 

If a new truck is more reliable than an old truck, the issue isn't the truck, it's the maintainer.

Posted

i also had the 1999 Silverado, wish i never sold it.  all it needed was trans rebuild and i would of saved $30,000 over my POS K2xx truck.  those where easy to work on and parts are very cheap. enjoy that old beast bud! the new trucks T1 models are bigger Pieces of unreliable shit" dont buy just lease the new garbage.. evrything will be autonimous and electric soon, and the Government will have lock outs on the next models that will further add limitations to our travels, THink Universal ID for your car when driving cross country. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

2016 Yukon XL Denali 6.2 liter   65K miles had a bent push rod and rocker arm (just out of powertrain warranty)  Now at 72K miles I collapsed lifters and a dead cam.  Over $4,000 to repair, but GM will cover 25% of that because I am a "loyal" customer (This is my 10th consecutive Suburban/Yukon XL).    Anyone know how to convince the GM cost assistance rep that this is a lousy offer?

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...