Jump to content

Replacement Battery Upgrade Options


Darksky

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some of you top tier guys who run nothing but AMSOIL may scoff or laugh at me here, but I will give a thumbs up to the Duralast from Autozone.

Do not know or care who makes them but has been reliable to date. 

All I can say is that I am going on 6 years with the Duralast battery in my daily driver 2000 ford Taurus.

I would shy away from anything at Walmart.

Also, I am still on my original factory Delco battery in my 14 Sierra after nearly 6 years for what it is worth.

Optima batteries are popular with the off-road guys.

Posted
1 hour ago, Sierra Dan said:

Some of you top tier guys who run nothing but AMSOIL may scoff or laugh at me here, but I will give a thumbs up to the Duralast from Autozone.

Do not know or care who makes them but has been reliable to date. 

All I can say is that I am going on 6 years with the Duralast battery in my daily driver 2000 ford Taurus.

I would shy away from anything at Walmart.

Also, I am still on my original factory Delco battery in my 14 Sierra after nearly 6 years for what it is worth.

Optima batteries are popular with the off-road guys.

I wont knock ya at all.  I think Odyssey batteries are the best you can get if you want to spend the money.  With that said I run a Duralast Platinum AGM in my CTSV and it hasn't given me a bit of trouble going on two years now.  Its not a daily driver and will sometimes sit for 2-3 weeks between starts.  Fires up every time.  I had the cheap Duralast in my wifes MDX for maybe a year and last year we had a couple of really cold days/nights and every morning it would be dead.  Autozone took it back under warranty and replaced it with a Duralast Platinum and it hasn't given me a bit of trouble even over this past winter when we got into the teens a few times.  The AC Delco was in my V for 5yrs before I replaced it and it was still good at the time.  I just replaced it to be proactive

Posted
8 hours ago, kennerz said:

what's the cost differential between a interstate and odyssey?

The Odyssey runs around $259. The Interstate is $194. At least where I’m located that’s what they cost

Posted

I trickle charged my OEM battery, reinstalled it with tightened cable and a dab of dielectric grease, it seems to be performing appropriately. I have a local source for a NORTHSTAR battery that is their high end line in a 94R for less than $250 out the door, so if my OEM battery has another misstep, I will be replacing it with this one. Time will tell if it’s a wise choice, I will keep you all up on what happens. Thanks for the references and suggestions.

ED6DC3F9-5144-46D9-BF2C-9B9447852A60.jpeg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...