Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've got a 2020 LTZ that I just picked up this week with safety package and cooled seats.  Truck has about 200 miles on it and I can't drive it any more.  Has made my right leg go numb.  Definitely related to a the mechanics under the seat and not enough cushioning.  I never would have noticed it if I didn't spend at least 50 mins driving it at once.  Now, I can't even make it to the store without my leg hurting.  Called the dealer who will run it up the flagpole on Monday.  I realize they're going to tell me to pound sand. 
 
I guess my alternatives are to get a gel pillow which defeats the heated/cooled seats as well as the vibrating (which I didn't know about and really don't want.)  Other options are taking a financial bath and selling it at a loss or a Hail Mary is perhaps the dealer will cancel the sale because the trucks are in demand in my area.
 
Extremely disappointed in these seats and now as a result, this truck.  Completely unusable for me.

If you got a smokin’ deal on the purchase price, try pricing out an offer for Carvana or Vroom to buy it from you. They seem to be paying good money for our trucks right now. They’ll buy mine from me for more than I paid in November last year.
Posted

not only is it uncomfortable does anyone here find the folding middle seat where the plastic holds the seatbelt pokes them in the leg ?  the design is just so bad 

Posted
9 hours ago, bamorris2 said:


If you got a smokin’ deal on the purchase price, try pricing out an offer for Carvana or Vroom to buy it from you. They seem to be paying good money for our trucks right now. They’ll buy mine from me for more than I paid in November last year.

GM Family First pricing.  It was OK.  Not too many smokin' hot deals out there in this market.  Used trucks are in high demand.  But I'll definitely be looking at these companies as well as Carmax if I'm not able to find a viable option.  I ordered something called the Purple Everywhere Seat cushion and it looks like it might help.  Seems to be low profile with padding in the right places.  Plus is looks like it lets air flow through and the heated/ventilated seats would still work.  https://purple.com/seat-cushions/every-where

 

Posted

I tried the purple cushion and didn't particularly care for it, also it says not to leave it in the car all day. I'm in Texas and have a black truck so it gets to probably 140 in there after being outside a while, not sure if that will actually start to melt it or what.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
14 hours ago, Pinnacle said:

not only is it uncomfortable does anyone here find the folding middle seat where the plastic holds the seatbelt pokes them in the leg ?  the design is just so bad 

YUP!

Posted
5 hours ago, Gangly said:

YUP!

Are you telling me you got a bench seat in your truck? it doesn't come with a center console?

Posted

Shame nothing beats the seats that came in the gmt-800 line, my 05 silverado had essentially two lazy boy recliners in them. My 14 while not terrible were certainly nowhere near as good as the ones in my 05 and looks like they have gotten worse which is not surprising. My 14 seat cover is also ripping apart with the fake carbon fiber look vinyl on the all terrain lines, first seat cover i will have ever had to replace in my 3 decades of driving now..

Posted (edited)

1208888689_JumpSeat.thumb.jpg.3f72c01f3c3d5243df4fd7f887bd7510.jpg

19 hours ago, Pinnacle said:

Are you telling me you got a bench seat in your truck? it doesn't come with a center console?

I have a fold down, middle jump seat with a safe beneath it.

Edited by Gangly
Posted
16 hours ago, Gangly said:

1208888689_JumpSeat.thumb.jpg.3f72c01f3c3d5243df4fd7f887bd7510.jpg

I have a fold down, middle jump seat with a safe beneath it.

I was certain the z71 2LT came with the console?  wow how much did you pay for that truck?

Posted (edited)

Its not a 2LT, just an LT.  To be honest, I am unaware of a 2LT.

 

2020 Crew Cab LT Z71 Texas Edition - $39,600 before TT&L

Edited by Gangly
Posted
1 hour ago, Gangly said:

Its not a 2LT, just an LT.  To be honest, I am unaware of a 2LT.

 

2020 Crew Cab LT Z71 Texas Edition - $39,600 before TT&L

ya I miss read that. there is a 2LT 2019 my bad.  but ya I had the same problem its unbearable. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The only thing I HATE about my 2020 is the seats. Yeah I probably should have taken a longer test drive. But seriously my back, neck, legs, they all ache after long drives. Can anyone post how to put more foam under the cover?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I had a similar issue with my 2020 TB in which the front bucket seats were not comfortable after a 20 minute drive (out of town).

I played around with my driver seat and got the settings right that made the seat much more comfortable, and I verified this with an hour round trip drive (out of town) - about 70 miles.

The passenger seat on the other hand which only had reclining and front-back adjustments would need to have some additional cushioning which would be achieved by adding additional padding underneath the bottom cover or by an external cushion on top of the seat.

One of my neighbors has a 2019 AT4 with a similar issue and elected to use external cushions on the seats.

Posted

I have about 15000 on mine and the seats are a little firmer but I use my tilt on the front so it doesn't cut into my legs. Longest trip so far has been 800 miles stopping once for gas but they're nothing like my 2016 this one is 2020 AT4

Posted

I currently have a 2014 GMC Sierra. When I test drove a 2019 Sierra, the first thing I noticed was that that the 2019 seats were much firmer. After the test drive, I returned home with my 2014 Sierra and noticed that my 2014 seats were much more comfortable.  The 2022 Sierra model is supposed to get a new interior (basically the 2021 GMC Yukon interior). I hope the seats are upgraded in the 2022 and are more comfortable. I am holding out for the 2022 model.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...