Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

NEED INFO!  Today, I took my 2019 GMC AT4 to the shop to have the Readylift 2in SST kit installed with a set of 305/50R20 Nittos on my stock rims.  Shop just called and said only way to run these tires & rims is with a 1/2 to 3/4 inch spacer.  Anyone else with same setup have this issue???

Posted

That tire is 12.5 wide. If you are running it on a stock wheel, the spacers would make sense as I think the stock tire is 11.4 wide. Its probably getting really close to the UCA given the factory offset.

Posted
39 minutes ago, jail4u677 said:

NEED INFO!  Today, I took my 2019 GMC AT4 to the shop to have the Readylift 2in SST kit installed with a set of 305/50R20 Nittos on my stock rims.  Shop just called and said only way to run these tires & rims is with a 1/2 to 3/4 inch spacer.  Anyone else with same setup have this issue???

That is certainly a known issue. Your factory wheels don't offer the offset / backspace required to clear your upper control arms. If you decide to run spacers make sure you go with hub centric quality spacers such as those offered by Bora. 

Posted
4 hours ago, WheelsASAP.com said:

That is certainly a known issue. Your factory wheels don't offer the offset / backspace required to clear your upper control arms. If you decide to run spacers make sure you go with hub centric quality spacers such as those offered by Bora. 

Thanks!!!  Any idea on spacer size?  Tech at the shop said 1/2 " to 3/4 ".  Did some internet shopping and most I found were 1" or greater.  I figure better to go with a little bigger in the 1" than not enough.

Posted
7 minutes ago, jail4u677 said:

Thanks!!!  Any idea on spacer size?  Tech at the shop said 1/2 " to 3/4 ".  Did some internet shopping and most I found were 1" or greater.  I figure better to go with a little bigger in the 1" than not enough.

Your stock wheels likely sit approx. 3/4 inch inside the wheel well, give or take. So if you go with a larger spacer than that, you’ll have some poke. My suggestion would be to go with what the shop recommends.

Posted

Thanks again.  Any ideas on where to shop that I could get them fast?  Also, some places sell as a pair and others sell all four.  Do I need 2 or 4?

Posted
NEED INFO!  Today, I took my 2019 GMC AT4 to the shop to have the Readylift 2in SST kit installed with a set of 305/50R20 Nittos on my stock rims.  Shop just called and said only way to run these tires & rims is with a 1/2 to 3/4 inch spacer.  Anyone else with same setup have this issue???


This might help you and your shop.


https://wheelsasap.com/gmc-at4-oversized-tire-trimming-guide/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted

1.75 Bora spacers, stock wheels and tires - before/after photo attached.

piZap_1595029403141.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, CrunchyBlack_386 said:

Looks great! Any rubbing at all?

No rubbing full lock.  I can fit my hand between tires and front liner and 1/2" clearance on rear liner.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

2" SST

285/75/18 Nitto Ridge Grapplers

Zero rubbing anywhere surprisingly.

Very little clearance on the upper control arm but it clears. Don't think you could go any wider without different wheels or addition of wheel spacers. 

IMG_3562.thumb.JPG.6d6b74da8ca0e67795a7b1a6c4b463b1.JPG

  • Like 2
Posted

2020 GMC SIERRA 1500 4X4 CREW CAB 3.0 Duramax

Front: FOX 2.5 Coilovers front (3.5” of lift)

Rear: Deaver mini pack w/FOX 2.0 (1.5’-2” lift)

Wheels: American Racing AX202 18x9 0mm/5.0” backSpacing

Tires: BFG K02 35x12.50x18
Trimming required...good instructions adjust based on your needs...no rubbing now.  
186318

 


 

 

2A5C52CC-2436-4D1F-970E-6FCA9A6D3454.jpeg

DEED15E0-077D-4545-BCBD-C21ADCD2D0EA.jpeg

A7C4043D-1A12-489D-A996-362AAD912D83.jpeg

81CBA790-B00C-4BAA-89D4-747C875CE911.jpeg

  • Like 4
Posted
2020 GMC SIERRA 1500 4X4 CREW CAB 3.0 Duramax
Front: FOX 2.5 Coilovers front (3.5” of lift)
Rear: Deaver mini pack w/FOX 2.0 (1.5’-2” lift)
Wheels: American Racing AX202 18x9 0mm/5.0” backSpacing
Tires: BFG K02 35x12.50x18
Trimming required...good instructions adjust based on your needs...no rubbing now.  
186318
 

 
 
2A5C52CC-2436-4D1F-970E-6FCA9A6D3454.jpeg.0ccb087786de6fd051cc594147c29e4c.jpeg
DEED15E0-077D-4545-BCBD-C21ADCD2D0EA.jpeg.1f0714cc975803765d13ae9ac73f8e9c.jpeg
A7C4043D-1A12-489D-A996-362AAD912D83.jpeg.658487646d74dfa09f794c29df2d9068.jpeg
81CBA790-B00C-4BAA-89D4-747C875CE911.thumb.jpeg.4f7c30ec0643175285f571e3b4845f09.jpeg

Nice set up! How are you liking the Duramax?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...