Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

Wow, it’s lots cheaper than the Amsoil too. Just doesn’t have the supporting wire backing on either. I’m willing to give it a shot!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't knock the DELCO BRO! 

 

792 gph

13.2 Gpm

 

Wire backing not needed and only adds to iron count/contamination....heck even the gaskets will show up with silicone contamination.  You want the cleanest highest flow rate of any filter..Better put a DELCO ON THERE SON!  Brand new filters are dirty right out of the box.

Posted
Why do you buy qts when your truck takes 2 gallons?  Just order the gallons and stop messing around with individual qts.  LOL

Don’t have anywhere to store them, I’d have to rearrange my cabinets, to much work. Besides, they’re easier to tote around when space is a concern during road trips but I’ve definitely been thinking about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
27 minutes ago, mookdoc6 said:

Don't knock the DELCO BRO! 

 

792 gph

13.2 Gpm

 

Wire backing not needed and only adds to iron count/contamination....heck even the gaskets will show up with silicone contamination.  You want the cleanest highest flow rate of any filter..Better put a DELCO ON THERE SON!  Brand new filters are dirty right out of the box.

You make me :crackup:

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

You make me :crackup:

Grumps,

 

I know you don't care or would listen to me anyway but my later stage goal in life is to post/update on this forum my K2 with more miles and still operating whether it takes 10yrs or 4 trans in my sled THAN PEPPER!  I am gonna see it through!

 

Anyway, I decided to change out my Vacuum pump recently.  I am not even sure your 4.3 has one but I assume it does?  I couldn't sleep thinking of having anybody else work on my baby other than me so I opted to do it myself.  Did the OEM pump need to come off since I bought it?  No, it worked fine as far as I was concerned other than being loud I thought.  So after examination it's clear to me as to the main problem with this design.  The casted body slightly different has little to no bearing.  The internals?  Not sure... discarded old unit and obviously didn't open up new unit?  The culprit is the Micro-screen and it's so fine inevitably even with 2k OCI with Redline/Amsoil or BOB'S SLICK 0W-20 the screen will restrict from engine combustion byproducts, junk etc. and ultimately fail!  I am just giving you a heads up for 130.00 I think I paid....Yes, it's far quieter than original and the new pumps safety screen is literally 100x more open and will not restrict or clog unless you go 100k without changing oil.

 

So go outside tomorrow scratch the OL'  Nutsack and ponder the wisdom I tried to instill?  Choice is yours I don't judge!  MOOK

Edited by mookdoc6
Posted
Grumps,
 
I know you don't care or would listen to me anyway but my later stage goal in life is to post/update on this forum my K2 with more miles and still operating whether it takes 10yrs or 4 trans in my sled THAN PEPPER!  I am gonna see it through!
 
Anyway, I decided to change out my Vacuum pump recently.  I am not even sure your 4.3 has one but I assume it does?  I couldn't sleep thinking of having anybody else work on my baby other than me so I opted to do it myself.  Did the OEM pump need to come off since I bought it?  No, it worked fine as far as I was concerned other than being loud I thought.  So after examination it's clear to me as to the main problem with this design.  The casted body slightly different has little to no bearing.  The internals?  Not sure... discarded old unit and obviously didn't open up new unit?  The culprit is the Micro-screen and it's so fine inevitably even with 2k OCI with Redline/Amsoil or BOB'S SLICK 0W-20 the screen will restrict from engine combustion byproducts, junk etc. and ultimately fail!  I am just giving you a heads up for 130.00 I think I paid....Yes, it's far quieter than original and the new pumps safety screen is literally 100x more open and will not restrict or clog unless you go 100k without changing oil.
 
So go outside tomorrow scratch the OL'  Nutsack and ponder the wisdom I tried to instill?  Choice is yours I don't judge!  MOOK

Waste of time dude. Most of the same people worried about oil and filter changes and micro filtration. Are slobbering all over themselves over GMs Frankenstein engine’s that only get a couple extra miles per gallon at best. That’s only if you drive slow enough for it to work. My family business used Amsoil and its filters since the 80s. Most our testing was done on Diesel engines that ran at redline for 8-10 hrs a day. That was on pipelines in the most dusty conditions imagined. We double OCIs hours from conventional oil. Never an engine failure. That’s hundreds of engines. Other oils such as redline synthetic was added later. I still go extended with most of my gas engines. There’s been many of those tested too. One more interesting fact I learned dabbling in the salvage yard business in the 90s. Most of the non wrecked cars people brought to us still ran. The biggest killer of automobiles in my area was failing smog. It was easier to buy another used car at a pay as you go lot. Than fixing car that wouldn’t pass inspection. With the possible exception of some of the GM Frankenstein engines. Engine failures aren’t the demise of most vehicles. Way down the list is oil and filters. But it’s fun reading about how people sweat the micro filtration. For the most of the people who read this thread. That may not know better. Don’t buy the cheapest oil and filters. Follow the manufacturers recommended OCIs. With the possible exception of the Frankenstein GM engines or Rams. I’d go with the manufacturers extreme service. There’s a lot going on in those engines.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

It’s the same price as the Amsoil!

444711e34264028f64de14736e2abf38.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i was very clear, but you might have missed it...NOT BOSS, Purolator ONE...the Boss actually doesnt filter as well as the ONE...even though it is their 'premium' filter...

Posted
7 hours ago, mookdoc6 said:

Grumps,

 

I know you don't care or would listen to me anyway but my later stage goal in life is to post/update on this forum my K2 with more miles and still operating whether it takes 10yrs or 4 trans in my sled THAN PEPPER!  I am gonna see it through!

 

Anyway, I decided to change out my Vacuum pump recently. 

 

So go outside tomorrow scratch the OL'  Nutsack and ponder the wisdom I tried to instill?  Choice is yours I don't judge!  MOOK

Dear Sir MOOK:

 

I enjoy your humor and I do actually listen intently to you. You set such lofty goals my friend and honor me as your benchmark. However I'm a fairly low bar as a standard overall. No one listens to me either. So....I guess we are two peas in a pod and we will trudge toward that million mile mark together. ? 

 

Yep, Pepper has a vacuum pump and we are currently at 130K on the old OEM and silent as a church fart. My reason for not as yet updating to the new pump is that this critter is still covered under the extended warranty for yet another 20K. If she makes it that far I will indeed be doing the upgrade. An no, I did not know the screen mesh was different between them. Interesting tidbit of trivia that will come in useful me thinks. Thanks!

 

Speaking of screens. Did you change the one to the VLOM under the pressure switch? Pepper had hers replace at 90,426 miles. That screen is fine as panty hose. Guess what? Looked like new. Imagine that! So why replace it? Well it got destroyed removing it. That thing is really in there for keeps. Used a pick to get it out.  

 

On a personal note. Been hot enough for ya there lately in the land of Sun and Sand?  :lol:

 

With regards to my brother from another mother

Grumpy Old Bear

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

Well, my next replacement OCI oil and filters arrived. Only wish I knew WTH the flow rate is in all these filters, both say 99% at 20 microns but neither give flow rate when they’re at least at 50%. I guess we’re to assume that their marketing departments don’t like to release this information, not required which leads me to believe something is being kept from us all.

Spenpet, can you please take a pick of your pressure gauge at idle and and at normal driving so you can see the difference between before using Purolator and after? Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, i will...i just changed my oil...so it will be awhile. but i will do that when time gets closer...

  • Like 1
Posted
i was very clear, but you might have missed it...NOT BOSS, Purolator ONE...the Boss actually doesnt filter as well as the ONE...even though it is their 'premium' filter...

That’s interesting cause online says the Boss is better than the one. No worries, to each their own, looks like I’ll just stick with what’s worked great for me for these years and maybe one day, when I’ve run out of my Amsoil filters, I may just test the Purolator. Thanks for your input, looking forward to hearing more about your pressure difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:


That’s interesting cause online says the Boss is better than the one. No worries, to each their own, looks like I’ll just stick with what’s worked great for me for these years and maybe one day, when I’ve run out of my Amsoil filters, I may just test the Purolator. Thanks for your input, looking forward to hearing more about your pressure difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In the video you posted, it articulated that the Boss is more heavy duty and fully synthetic materials, but it is i think 98% or less...i cant recall...but the ONE is 99%...again...all about filtration, not overall performance...

Posted
In the video you posted, it articulated that the Boss is more heavy duty and fully synthetic materials, but it is i think 98% or less...i cant recall...but the ONE is 99%...again...all about filtration, not overall performance...


It was VERY CLEAR, said the Boss was more than 99% in filtration lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Dear Sir MOOK:

 

I enjoy your humor and I do actually listen intently to you. You set such lofty goals my friend and honor me as your benchmark. However I'm a fairly low bar as a standard overall. No one listens to me either. So....I guess we are two peas in a pod and we will trudge toward that million mile mark together. ? 

 

Yep, Pepper has a vacuum pump and we are currently at 130K on the old OEM and silent as a church fart. My reason for not as yet updating to the new pump is that this critter is still covered under the extended warranty for yet another 20K. If she makes it that far I will indeed be doing the upgrade. An no, I did not know the screen mesh was different between them. Interesting tidbit of trivia that will come in useful me thinks. Thanks!

 

Speaking of screens. Did you change the one to the VLOM under the pressure switch? Pepper had hers replace at 90,426 miles. That screen is fine as panty hose. Guess what? Looked like new. Imagine that! So why replace it? Well it got destroyed removing it. That thing is really in there for keeps. Used a pick to get it out.  

 

On a personal note. Been hot enough for ya there lately in the land of Sun and Sand?  :lol:

 

With regards to my brother from another mother

Grumpy Old Bear

 

 

Don't worry I learned as a yout to set my goals low to avoid disappointment!  I look under my throttle body frequently and look there it is.....Won't be long and I will be taking a peek at the screen!  I mean 124k and you know it's showing her age...rough idle, sputtering and where is the oil going thing?  Must be a Frankenchrist engine I have.  Good luck with yours!  MOOK

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TXGREEK said:

 


It was VERY CLEAR, said the Boss was more than 99% in filtration lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

ha! yeah, it does...i was confusing my sources...but i think the Boss is 99% at a higher micros...so let me go back to my research...the ONE is 99% at 20 micros...i think the boss is 99% at like 40 micros...(hold please)

Posted
2 minutes ago, spenpet said:

ha! yeah, it does...i was confusing my sources...but i think the Boss is 99% at a higher micros...so let me go back to my research...the ONE is 99% at 20 micros...i think the boss is 99% at like 40 micros...(hold please)

yes...Boss is at 25 micros...while the ONE is at 20 micros...again...i have no idea what that means in real world scenarios, but i do know that 99% at 20 micros is better than 99% at 25 micros...sorry...had a lot of research i was sifting through in my mind (the video you pulled was one of the resources i came across)...

Posted
ha! yeah, it does...i was confusing my sources...but i think the Boss is 99% at a higher micros...so let me go back to my research...the ONE is 99% at 20 micros...i think the boss is 99% at like 40 micros...(hold please)

https://carcarenewsservice.org/article/premium-oil-filters-keep-oil-clean-flowing-smoothly-between-oil-changes


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...