Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I definitely do.

 

I bought one of those clone Tech 2 scan tools for my 2007 Yukon.  I would set it up and watch the knock sensor and timing ****** functions on my 5.3L (LMG) engine while driving around town and short highway jaunts.  This engine has a compression ratio of 9.9:1.  Even around town the knock sensors were constantly lighting up with a corresponding timing adjustment.

 

What I determined is the tuning of the ECU has the engine "ride the knock sensors" for final timing adjustment.  There were times when I noted the timing was actually retarded to ATDC...

 

While I suspect the 6.2L engines (with their higher compression ratios) can run "safely" on regular gas, due to the sensitivity of the ECU and its sensors, you are going to sacrifice performance with lower octane fuels and I think are depending everything in the sensor loop to be working really optimally to avoid damage.

 

Where I live 91 is the highest octane I can buy from a pump.  The cost is always about +10% or less for 91 over 87.  When I do the math, in the big picture, it just isn't enough to worry about so I follow what the owners manual recommends.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Kilgore Trout said:

I definitely do.

 

I bought one of those clone Tech 2 scan tools for my 2007 Yukon.  I would set it up and watch the knock sensor and timing ****** functions on my 5.3L (LMG) engine while driving around town and short highway jaunts.  This engine has a compression ratio of 9.9:1.  Even around town the knock sensors were constantly lighting up with a corresponding timing adjustment.

 

What I determined is the tuning of the ECU has the engine "ride the knock sensors" for final timing adjustment.  There were times when I noted the timing was actually retarded to ATDC...

 

While I suspect the 6.2L engines (with their higher compression ratios) can run "safely" on regular gas, due to the sensitivity of the ECU and its sensors, you are going to sacrifice performance with lower octane fuels and I think are depending everything in the sensor loop to be working really optimally to avoid damage.

 

Where I live 91 is the highest octane I can buy from a pump.  The cost is always about +10% or less for 91 over 87.  When I do the math, in the big picture, it just isn't enough to worry about so I follow what the owners manual recommends.

 

1 hour ago, Bherm said:

How many of you are using premium fuel on the 6.2 engine 

 

Those who run low octane fuel in their 6.2s eventually take out the pistons and rings.  Knock and ping cannot always be detected by ear, it must be measured with a scan tool as Bill mentioned.  

  • Like 2
Posted

have been running premium per recommendations for the engine since day 1.  runs great.  I figure if I was worried about the cost of fuel I should have bought something else.  

  • Like 4
Posted

I'm old school and at 11.5 to 1 premium is the only way to go.  Yes the ECU can adjust but why make things work harder than they need to. 

 

Justin from Black Bear Performance highly suggest that you at least run 89.  He sees a ton of GM 5.3 and 6.2 engines come in to be tuned and like posted above, you can't always hear it but destination is there and bad ju ju.

  • Like 2
Posted

I didn't make the truck, so I trust the professionals that did.  They recommend 93 octane, but that's not available where I'm at, so I use the next closest thing -- 91.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, eppieguy said:

I run only top tier premium fuel in mine.

 

The problem with topteir is that there's no oversight! It's an honor system. The driver dumps in whatever additives he was given before pulling out. Honor in this world 🤣

Posted

Agreed, why would anyone spend the money on a 6.2 and then worry about the added cost of the recommended fuel?  I use 93 octane at every fill up. 

  • Like 1
Posted

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg

Posted (edited)

I always use 91 premium and 99% of the time its Murphy with occasional Shell and they don not have ethanol in the 91 in this area as so stated on the pumps. Near Lake Superior and no sensible boater will buy ethanol blended fuel.  On 93, a local marine dealer told me some time ago that all 93 has ethanol blend to meet the 93 level and that's why you won't find stations around here selling it.   Boaters and snowmobiler's wouldn't buy it.  Not trying to start an ethanol argument but stating reasons for only 91 available here (Lake Superior adjacent) 

Edited by elcamino
  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, I use premium, it's 92 octane, but it is also non-ethanol. I've been running it since 2003 when I bought my Silverado SS. Do I need it, maybe not, but whats a few penny's here and there.

Posted (edited)
On 12/11/2021 at 10:00 AM, Bherm said:

How many of you are using premium fuel on the 6.2 engine 

 

Those that want to be able to make the horsepower that they paid a premium for will run high octane. 

 

Octane prevents/reduces knocking.

Engines have knock sensors.

When knock is detected the computer changes timing and fuel to avoid knock -- and this reduces available power. 

 

'Here' 'high test' is about 15% - 25% more expensive than 'regular'. 

 

fwiw, premium does NOT contain more energy. 

As posted by supreme pizza, octane makes less volatile so it burn slower, which prevents/reduces knock. 

 

I see from the picture that, similar to here, premium is 2.64/2.14 = 1.23 times the cost of regular at that location. 

 

 

Everyone gets to decide what they want to do about engine choice and fuel choice.

If there was a single right answer there would only be one engine and one fuel. 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Anyone have any info about backorder time? It's classic 4th of July hot here in ohio.
    • There would be one way of determining the quality of the factory oil although probably more than a typical oil lab test, and that would be to draw out some oil from a new truck and send a sample to a lab that could do a more elaborate test of the oil. The issue with too little oil in the diff may not be the lack of lubrication of the diff bearings and gears themselves ( although a lack of oil volume for cooling ) but the wheel bearings because at some point the oil would be too low to properly get onto the spinning axle or fed along the axle tube. That was the claim by the local dealer from a couple of trucks in recent years that had the wheel bearings fail and they figured from lack of sufficient oil due to a severe underfilled diff and some of the bearing material made its way to the diff and it got damaged as well so the axle housings were just replaced on warranty. But your right that if the diff is over filled by whatever margin that it causes more churning of the oil than is desirable and that is no good either and can cause a pinion seal to leak. Also old oil I believe can tend to loose some of its properties like antifoaming and another good reason to change the diff oil every so often. 
    • I would be surprised if the diff's were not filled (with the cheapest gear lube) at the axle factory before being shipped to GM.  If you ever watched them building trucks they install the axles and all suspension parts with the frame upside down and then turn it over before its time to install the engine.     Too much gear lube in a axle can be worse than not enough especially with a lower quality GL where is get whipped up with entrained air (foam)  weakening its ability to lubricate.        
    • This is the 6.6 gasser section of the forum, you should either delete or modify your previous post as it is misleading for anyone looking for factual information on their 6.6 gas engine.
    • Well....I've done my first intake gasket. Probably wrong, but...we'll see?   Ultra black on the china walls and 1/4" up onto the sides of the intake gaskets. Permatex High Tack (couldn't find Gaskachinch) on the head side of the intake gasket. I read wrong and it says you're supposed to put it on the mating surface of the head, not the gasket. Hoping it's like a PB&J sandwich where it doesn't matter what side the PB goes on so long as there's jelly. That crap is messy/sticky and I got a dab or two on the intake port openings, tried to wipe it off. Hopefully it won't be a big deal and will only aid in sealing.   Per instructions I left the intake (top side) of the gasket dry except for a light smear of RTV around the coolant ports. Wiggling the intake in there was a bear but I had help to free me of surrounding wiring/stuff but I was basically able to set it straight down lined up with the bolt holes.   I did not think to wait until the RTV skinned over but there probably was 5-10 minutes while it sat before installing the intake.   Bolts finger tight first. Then, followed the Chilton's manual pattern to snug them to 15 lb-ft.   Waited a little over an hour, and then did the final torque in sequence again to 35 lb-ft.   Yesterday I replaced the fuel pressure regulator and got my new "nut and bolt kit" (fuel lines) installed. Damn GM used security torx on the spider, which I don't have, so I got scammed at the local HW store for an off-brand security Torx bit set.   The new driver's door mirror arrived yesterday, so, there's a chance this thing could be running and road legal tomorrow? I don't want to get my hopes up.   This will be my first time stabbing a distributor, too. Although, lucky me, someone else marked the old distributor for removal previously, I did see that. (Someone's been here before!!). Engine is still at TDC so it *should* be just a matter of transferring the mark to the new dizzy and rotating it into place.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...