Jump to content

2019 Sierra 1500 and AMSOIL OE Fuel Efficient ATF vs Signature Series compatibility?

LightProbs
 Share

Recommended Posts

LightProbs Enthusiast

LightProbs

Posted
Posted

Has anyone else used the AMSOIL OE ATF over the Signature Series in their 8 Speed? Any issues? Looking to get a flush done soon and want to make sure the fluid is compatible. I'd rather not shell out $300 CAD for the signature series when the OE will do.

 

Thanks.

Bamacommander Enthusiast

Bamacommander

Posted
Posted (edited)

If it’s not broke don’t fix it. There were all sorts of issues with this transmission until GM figured out which fluid to use. I’d stick with what GM recommends. 

Edited by Bamacommander
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

With the 8 speed and its fluid issues, the only thing I'd run is what GM calls for, Mobil 1 LV ATF HP with the Blue Label.  19417577.

  • Like 2
SilveradoRST Enthusiast

SilveradoRST

Posted
Posted

Might be a silly question but the curiosity in me needs to know.  Did Exxon/Mobil create this blue label product at GM’s request or was it always around?   And LV = low ?  HP = High Performance?

JimCost2014 Senior Enthusiast

JimCost2014

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, LightProbs said:

Has anyone else used the AMSOIL OE ATF over the Signature Series in their 8 Speed? Any issues? Looking to get a flush done soon and want to make sure the fluid is compatible. I'd rather not shell out $300 CAD for the signature series when the OE will do.

 

Thanks.

Just had the TSB done on mine, Mobil 1 LV ATF HP with the Blue Label.  19417577.

 

Could not be happier. 

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
customboss Senior Enthusiast

customboss

Posted
Posted

Informed Opinion:

 

Fully grasp getting the TSB done.  When I dig into the chemistry of the  Mobil 1 LV ATF HP vs Amsoil Signature Series ATL the Amsoil is at least 50% PAO based while M1 ATF is  at least 60% highly refined petroleum.  The Viscosity Index ( VI )  is not that far apart but 157 for M1 LV HP vs 161 for ATL.   Mobil 1 is getting there by pour point depressants and viscosity index improvers ( polymers that will give up the ghost). Amsoil is relying on the very high VI base oil thats GRP IV not GRP III.  

 

That means over the life of the fluid the Amsoil is going to be more viscosity stable, more resistant to high and low temps . If the dealer buys me the Mobil 1 I would run it and test it.   It will be fine until the lower quality base oil and VI and PPD get stressed and by the temps my 8 speed runs that won't be long. 

 

 

  • Like 2
customboss Senior Enthusiast

customboss

Posted
Posted
On 12/26/2021 at 11:38 AM, LightProbs said:

Has anyone else used the AMSOIL OE ATF over the Signature Series in their 8 Speed? Any issues? Looking to get a flush done soon and want to make sure the fluid is compatible. I'd rather not shell out $300 CAD for the signature series when the OE will do.

 

Thanks.

Contact  Black02Silverado Amsoil site sponsor here. He can answer that question. 

  • Like 2
Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted

Not sure how I missed this post.  I try to keep on here and up to date but seems things slip by.

 

I have talked to other AMSOIL dealers and they have had customers that have switched over to AMSOIL's ATL fluid which is the Signature Series and are not having any issues. 

 

The difference in the OE fluid and the Signature Series is the base oil used.  That is why the OE is less expensive.  To me if you are going to service your transmission, and as often as you service it, just use the Signature Series and don't look back.  I feel that is why I have had great success with all my vehicles is because I switch them over to SS within the first 5k miles of owning them.  My 2019 Silverado didn't get switched over until 25k miles because I was hoping to be able to do it myself.  But ran out of time and wanted it down so I just had the dealer install it for me.

 

I understand warranty and that most want to follow GM's recommendations but would really like to find someone that is having the 8sp shudder early on and switch over to see how it turns out.

  • Like 2
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted (edited)

MY 2 cents on Amsoil OE trans fluid.

I did a drain and fill on our 19 Hyundai Santa Fe with Amsoil OE trans fluid. It holds 6.87 quarts. I got 4 quarts out on a drain. 

It shifts better and is smoother. 

I will stick with the OE line because I change fluids more often. Going to switch the motor oil to OE on the next change.

Edited by diyer2
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 years later...
SteelD6 Enthusiast

SteelD6

Posted
Posted

I have a 2019 AT4 with 5.3 V8 and the 8 speed transmission. Was having hesitation and surge at start up and rumble at 1500 rpms in the 52-57 mph range. Took the truck to the dealership and they did a flush and fill at 51k miles. Problem solved; I am now at 73k and the problem is back, though not as pronounced. I am switching over to Amsoil Signature ATF next Tuesday. I will keep this thread posted on how it goes/results. I have used Amsoil engine oil for decades but I am just an average guy with nothing tied to a brand. I will provide honest evaluation and feedback.

  • Thanks 2
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, SteelD6 said:

I have a 2019 AT4 with 5.3 V8 and the 8 speed transmission. Was having hesitation and surge at start up and rumble at 1500 rpms in the 52-57 mph range. Took the truck to the dealership and they did a flush and fill at 51k miles. Problem solved; I am now at 73k and the problem is back, though not as pronounced. I am switching over to Amsoil Signature ATF next Tuesday. I will keep this thread posted on how it goes/results. I have used Amsoil engine oil for decades but I am just an average guy with nothing tied to a brand. I will provide honest evaluation and feedback.

 

 

8 speed should have nothing other than the GM stuff in it, Mobil 1 LV ATF HP p/n 19417577.  

  • Haha 1
SteelD6 Enthusiast

SteelD6

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, newdude said:

The GM stuff is not GM stuff...it's Mobile 1. 

I am going to use Amsoil Signature Series ATF

5 hours ago, newdude said:

 

8 speed should have nothing other than the GM stuff in it, Mobil 1 LV ATF HP p/n 19417577.  

 

  • 3 weeks later...
khjenki New Member

khjenki

Posted
Posted

How did the switch to Amsoil go?

 

I’ve got a 19 LTZ Z71 with same 5.3L/8 spd and had a flush at 56k using the updated fluid + a Valvoline additive which the dealer suggested.

 

I’m now at 78k miles and while better than before, I’m again noticing harder shifts in and out of 1st/2nd.

 

Also want to replace shocks/struts as I’ve had a pop from driver side since 32k miles which dealer hasn’t been able to diagnose after several tries.

 

Haven't wanted to throw parts at it but concerned I could also have a bad motor or body mount. Reading bad driver side motor mounts and transmission/lifter issues can all occur concurrently.

SteelD6 Enthusiast

SteelD6

Posted
Posted

The switch to the Amsoil Signature ATF was completed and the problems with the transmission are gone. Obviously too soon to tell about the durability of the fix, but so far I am pleased. Truck smoothly shifts through gears upon brisk acceleration from stop to 73 mph and also smoothly accelerates from 73 to 85 when passing. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...