Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Truston Gunter said:

I only saw one person mention the mobile 1 filter. Always thought mobile 1 was to be considered a "high quality" filter. Been using them since I started driving along with mobile 1 full synthetic. That's my 2 cents. 

Yeah you can’t go wrong with M1. I use M1 oil but not usually their filter but just due to wix usually being almost half the price and still an excellent filter. 

  • 7 months later...
Posted
On 9/26/2022 at 10:24 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

Food for thought:

 

iseecars.com says that  only 0.3% of all vehicles sold in the USA go past 300K, 1.2% of all vehicles sold in the USA make it past 200K miles but 95-98% will pass 100K. So...you could also say;

 

Once past 100K that 98%+ of the remaining vehicles FAIL....

Which begs some serious questions. 

 

When one says "This motor was designed to use a DEXOS 0W20!",

(for example)

Does that not say... 

"The design is to fail"? 

🤔

 

Posted

I strongly disagree !!! Personally put over 320K ,220K on new trucks and cars. just do the P.M s as required.

Posted
6 hours ago, TRUCKTOON said:

I strongly disagree !!! Personally put over 320K ,220K on new trucks and cars. just do the P.M s as required.

 

So, you are part of the 0.3%. Cool. Me too. Now what about the other 99.7% that didn't make it.  What is it you're disagreeing with? That you've managed to be part of a minority and that this proves the majority that fail somehow did not? Or you're just disagreeable on principle. :dunno: You are not disagreeing with me sir. It's the statistics you're having an issue with. They don't really care. Come to think of it, neither do I. You have yourself a nice evening. 

Posted

Okay, back on subject.

 

I'd be very careful with Wix filters lately.  I've personally seen two different models with crushed louvers (internal metal slits "louvers" inside filter) that were crushed enough to barely let oil flow through the filter.  At least 50% were 100% crushed closed.  The remaining louvers were slightly open...like 0.1 to 0.25mm.

One of the two models with this issue I've held in my hand is Wix (WL102255) that I was going to install in my truck.

I'm concerned Wix quality is having some issues, as like I mentioned this is the second time I've seen this.  Crushed louvers would basically cause the oil to immediately by-pass your filter.  The "dirty" oil that was able to go through the by-pass would be less than what typically goes through the filter media on a healthy filter.  Not Good.  Very disappointed in Wix for this.  Both models came out of the same Wix factory.

 

I'm going to stick with OEM AC Delco PF63 #1270724.  I really like the internal open design.  Flow wise, I believe this filter is one of the best on the market.  Plus it is OEM so I trust the quality.  Win win.

 

Posted

Does anyone have an opinion on running the  UPF63R instead of the standard PF63. I've been running the UltraGuard filters over the standard as a upgrade of sorts, and because by vehicles don't accrue the mileage before the time elapses between oil change intervals. The only difference I could discern the is the Ultraguard version has a higher bypass pressure.

Posted
21 hours ago, carkhz316 said:

Does anyone have an opinion on running the  UPF63R instead of the standard PF63. I've been running the UltraGuard filters over the standard as a upgrade of sorts, and because by vehicles don't accrue the mileage before the time elapses between oil change intervals. The only difference I could discern the is the Ultraguard version has a higher bypass pressure.

I believe the media in the UPF63R is better than the standard PF63 along with a heavier can. I think the bypass pressure is the same on both. I found the UPF on Rock auto for just a little more then the regular PF63. I still have a couple PF63 left but as soon as they are gone I have a supply of the UPF's

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/23/2023 at 3:05 PM, Dustin Marshall said:

Okay, back on subject.

 

I'd be very careful with Wix filters lately.  I've personally seen two different models with crushed louvers (internal metal slits "louvers" inside filter) that were crushed enough to barely let oil flow through the filter.  At least 50% were 100% crushed closed.  The remaining louvers were slightly open...like 0.1 to 0.25mm.

One of the two models with this issue I've held in my hand is Wix (WL102255) that I was going to install in my truck.

I'm concerned Wix quality is having some issues, as like I mentioned this is the second time I've seen this.  Crushed louvers would basically cause the oil to immediately by-pass your filter.  The "dirty" oil that was able to go through the by-pass would be less than what typically goes through the filter media on a healthy filter.  Not Good.  Very disappointed in Wix for this.  Both models came out of the same Wix factory.

 

I'm going to stick with OEM AC Delco PF63 #1270724.  I really like the internal open design.  Flow wise, I believe this filter is one of the best on the market.  Plus it is OEM so I trust the quality.  Win win.

 

I've noticed the same. If I get my WIX filter from my local O'Reillys all is fine. I've noticed QC issues on the filters I order online and have shipped to me. Coincidence? Who knows. Odd to me though 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/26/2023 at 8:19 AM, 64BAwagon said:

I believe the media in the UPF63R is better than the standard PF63 along with a heavier can. I think the bypass pressure is the same on both. I found the UPF on Rock auto for just a little more then the regular PF63. I still have a couple PF63 left but as soon as they are gone I have a supply of the UPF's

Thanks. I've been under the impression the Ultraguards are a premium version over the standard AC Delco, and since my OCI are so infrequent, a few extra dollars is no big deal for me. I just didn't want to use the "wrong" filter since they don't spec the UG for the 6.6.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

FWIW

 

I change my oil with M1 filter and M1 oil every time. Seems like most always a deal is running at Advance Auto Parts on them too, just always have to ask.

Edited by NaturallyAspirated
Posted

FYI the AC Delco oil filter PF63, GM Part # 12707246 has been superseded by PF63, GM Part # 12731742

I have no idea what (if any) difference there are.  Visually (holding both in my hand) they seem the same.

I'm curious if there are any differences?

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/28/2023 at 9:37 AM, Dustin Marshall said:

FYI the AC Delco oil filter PF63, GM Part # 12707246 has been superseded by PF63, GM Part # 12731742

I have no idea what (if any) difference there are.  Visually (holding both in my hand) they seem the same.

I'm curious if there are any differences?

The difference as far as I know is a higher psi bypass valve. 

  • Like 3
  • 7 months later...
Posted

Might as well wake this up.........

... Quite the discussion. 

... 2024 6.6 gasser, first oil change at 5,200. I deiced to skip the first free one as i didnt want them touching the pickup. 

... We all have our thoughts. I am NOT trying to push my thoughts or sell a product. I have found what i like and works for me and my reasons. 

... I have used reusable oil filters on 3 different Harley Davidsons, actually the same filter on the 3 and a drop in reusable on a Kawasaki KLR 650. Motorcycles. 

... The  HUBB is my second use on a vehicle i have used one on. The second being this new pickup.

... This isnt being posted for argument or negative debate, just to show the world of oil filters is not flat, and venturing out of it one wont fall off the world. 

 

20240323_105225.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
18 hours ago, lineman1234 said:

Might as well wake this up.........

... Quite the discussion. 

... 2024 6.6 gasser, first oil change at 5,200. I deiced to skip the first free one as i didnt want them touching the pickup. 

... We all have our thoughts. I am NOT trying to push my thoughts or sell a product. I have found what i like and works for me and my reasons. 

... I have used reusable oil filters on 3 different Harley Davidsons, actually the same filter on the 3 and a drop in reusable on a Kawasaki KLR 650. Motorcycles. 

... The  HUBB is my second use on a vehicle i have used one on. The second being this new pickup.

... This isnt being posted for argument or negative debate, just to show the world of oil filters is not flat, and venturing out of it one wont fall off the world. 

 

20240323_105225.jpg

How do you clean the filters?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

How do you clean the filters?

 

Quote

 

Cleaning the Filter

The HUBB Filter can be cleaned by sending the inner core back to HUBB or to an authorized HUBB dealer for cleaning. A HUBB Cleaning Station and cleaning concentrate may be purchased to clean the filters in accordance with the required cleaning procedure. With either method, the filters must be cleaned as stated in your agreement with HUBB. HUBB Filters, Inc. warrants every HUBB filter to be free from defects in material and workmanship for a period of 100,000 miles or 5,000 hours, whichever comes first. The use and cleaning process required by HUBB Filters must be followed. View full warranty.

 

 

 

https://www.hubbfilters.com/cleaning-system

Edited by dsr611

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yea that's pretty normal to be off a few degrees.  Usually 2-4 degrees from say a weather app or thermometer.  
    • I just replaced the ambient air temperature sensor.  Easy as pie. I simply had to remove about 10-12 clips on the plastic cover over the radiator and remove two T-10 torx screws on the hood release lever to liberate the cover (Amazingly, none of the clips broke.  All came out and went back in with zero problems). Once the cover was removed, the temp sensor is easily accessible. The sensor cable snakes through a few guides and can be pulled out for even easier access to the sensor. I was able to work the sensor out of the mounting hole.  There is a red sliding catch on the plug that must be pulled back to disconnect the cable.  The plug was quite tight.  I had to use a screwdriver to pry it out. I plugged in the new sensor ($6.45 from RockAuto), snapped it into the mounting hole and re-snaked the cable. I put the radiator cover back on and reattached the lever arm to the hood release.  All done!     I started up my Suburban.  The temperature read 82 °F. Other thermometers at my house read 80 °F.  Close enough.  It might be reading high as my vehicle was sitting in the sun.
    • Remember when you were 50 and they called you Old Man?
    • That one looks decent for the price   BUT..I want something that also supports OBDI/1.5. A lot of the prosumer-grade scanners don't have legacy support in order to keep costs low. I believe the Autel does if you go higher end with them.   For fun, I reached out to a local Snap-On rep because I was interested in the 2600. $1895 MSRP, says he can do $1595. That's still a lot, but then again, that's not a horrible discount for just asking out of the blue. Could probably do better if I was a regular buying off his truck, but I'm not.   Not sure if I mentioned but I didn't realize with USED scanners from Snap On that you need to make sure a) the serial number isn't flagged as stolen. On the newer ones, SnapOn can remotely disable the device if it's flagged in their system. And, customer service can tell you if it is, if you're thinking about buying used. B) Make sure it's paid off. If the seller still owes money to the truck or if they financed through Snap On, the device can be remotely disabled until the balance is paid. It's less clear if SnapOn will tell you if a balance is still owed; I didn't make it that far with the used model I was considering. I did read that SnapOn has no way of tracking any "truck financing" deals between the SnapOn rep and buyer, only if they financed through corporate. So there's that extra caution needed.   Still waffling on whether I go with a ~$500ish Autel/TopDon or spend bigger money. The value seems to be in the prosumer brands. I'm not giving them enough credit TBH, actual production repair shops use them daily BUT I'm still allergic to certain kinds of underdog products trying to unseat American companies with solid reputations. SnapOn's scanner isn't wholly made in the US, but it is assembled here and they have US support and probably the most proven/ robust legacy support.   Something to think about. Value, or principles? There's a $1k difference.
    • I'm thankful to live where we don't have extreme weather. We might all be blown to smithereens when Mt. Rainier goes, but 80 is warm enough in the summer and I can generally count the number of hard freezes in the winter on one hand. The cars here don't rust and they don't get sun-baked, either.   We have finished off many of our average 52 days of "clear/sunny" weather, though. Sunsets are coming earlier, the nights are a little cooler. It's right around the first week of September when we get our first warning that summer is coming to a close with overcast skies and the start of "hoodie weather" temperatures during the cooler parts of the day. By October, it's usually time to ditch the shorts. By November, it's mostly raining.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...