Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2019 Sierra SLT. Remote start will not work. I've checked all the security features it needs to operate. Tested battery. 12.4 volts. After pressing the lock on my key fob, I then hold the start button. The lights flash but the start process does not initiate.  Every other function on the key fobs work. The truck will start manually by pressing the start button on the dashboard. I have also replaced the batteries in my key fobs. I also have the My GMC app active. It sends the start function to the truck. Flashes the lights but does not start. Any suggestions?

Posted (edited)

I spent several months... turned out to be a defective hood latch on my 2019 crew Cab LT Z71.   Remote start works flawlessly since the hood latch was replaced.   I was also getting sporadic false MILs 

 

I talked directly with the mechanic and went through every MIL I encountered.  I then mentioned I had seen a hood open lamp briefly, but it went out.  He fiddled around with the hood latch and finally got it to fail and illuminate the hood open MIL.

 

Turns out it was the hood latch.   Also make sure all windows are fully closed and all doors closed and locked.

 

Mine would sometimes just do what yours does and other times also set off the anti theft.    

 

Hope this helps.     Search for my member name, you should find all the postings I did on this.

Edited by SteveP45
word correction
Posted

I haven't checked for any codes. However the hood latch could make sense. About a week ago. The alarm went off for no reason. I wonder if the hood latch triggered it. When I got in the truck it said theft attempted. Ever since then it hasn't remote started. It definitely doesn't say it's open on the dash but maybe it is intermittent?. Should I bypass that sensor to maybe test that theory?

Posted
21 minutes ago, Anthony Bautista said:

I haven't checked for any codes. However the hood latch could make sense. About a week ago. The alarm went off for no reason. I wonder if the hood latch triggered it. When I got in the truck it said theft attempted. Ever since then it hasn't remote started. It definitely doesn't say it's open on the dash but maybe it is intermittent?. Should I bypass that sensor to maybe test that theory?

 

 

If you bypass it, it won't remote start.

 

Replace the hood latch.  

Posted
13 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

If you bypass it, it won't remote start.

 

Replace the hood latch.  

I found a video of a guy that built a very simple bypass harness. It uses a 2.2k resistor. I don't want to be that guy that finds one video on YouTube and becomes an expert but. The 2.2k resistors are $5.  I ordered them and am going to try and bypass it. If it works I will definitely replace the latch. Just to be clear. I have no service engine light and no "hood open" warning light. There are no warning lights on. I just want test the theory before I throw a new latch on. I will definitely update the thread once I try it out.

Posted

Do not blame you for trying.   I ordered the same 2k resistors, but decided to spend the bucks and get the new latch installed.   The dealer gave me the old latch and if I have nothing better to do sometime I may fiddle with it.  Heck, I would need to find where I set the little bag of resisters.

Posted

The sequence is press the lock button, press the start button two times.  That is how my 19 SLT and now my 22 Denali work.

Posted

Yes,  that is how is is designed to work as long as none of the multitude of pre start tests do not fail.   Doors must be locked, all windows closed, nothing depressing throttle, hood must be closed, battery voltage must be correct, fuel pressure must be correct, no malfunction indicator lamp MIL codes set ( such as CEL, Service parking brake, service 4wd, service esc, service brakes…etc…. On and on….

 

Even when you have a code reader which I had you may be stuck… because in my case I had a malfunctioning hood latch which was not setting a code or turning on the MIL,  however it was not providing enough resistance to the anti theft system to make it happy and think the hood was latched to allow engine start….

 

 

Posted

I wonder how many hood latches have to fail in 3 to 4 years before GM will be pressured to issue a recall or allow the latches to be replaced at zero cost to the owner.

 

I remember the recall on the instrument cluster because the tiny stepper motors would quit working all of a sudden and a person would be without a speedometer and or tachometer.   That was on my 98  Chevy or 2004 z71…. Do not remember which as it was a long time ago…

Posted

I do not have to push lock then start 2 times on my 23 Denali, just push the remote start button twice, no locking button needed.

  • Like 1
Posted

Seems it depends on when the truck was built.

Not sure when it was changed, but GM's used to be push and release lock, then push and hold (4 sec) the start button. 

 

I'd guess it got changed with the refresh.

 

 

'21 sierra manual says

Starting the Engine Using Remote Start

1. Press and release 'Lock'.

2. Immediately press and hold 'start' until the turn signal lamps flash or for at least four seconds. 

 

'23 sierra manual says

Starting the Engine Using Remote Start
Press 'Start'  twice on the remote key.

The turn signal lamps will flash. The lamps flash to confirm the request to remote start the vehicle has been received. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...