Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yikes - sorry to hear that! My neighbor went through that with Ford over the Ecoboost their top engineers from Detroit couldn't even figure out. Boy does that say something about complexity of modern vehicles when the people who designed them can't even FIX them!! What a world we live in ...

 

I'm gonna run my vintage junk with (a few) modern parts until the day I die.

  • Like 3
Posted

Yikes - sorry to hear that! My neighbor went through that with Ford over the Ecoboost their top engineers from Detroit couldn't even figure out. Boy does that say something about complexity of modern vehicles when the people who designed them can't even FIX them!! What a world we live in ...

 

I'm gonna run my vintage junk with (a few) modern parts until the day I die.

Thanks brother
Posted

 

ce6b1c1c4e3a86b81939854ecd3049af.jpg I put some stickers on my truck and will be putting the Iron Cross bumper back on the front soon and started detailing it today going through it top to bottom don't want any problems while going to hockey practice in the stupid early morning hours this winter.

Posted

Started the buyback process

Refresh my memory on why it's at the dealer again. What's next? Getting another one?

Posted

Popping / knocking sound in the rear and 74mph & up vibration

 

Yes the dealer is working on putting me in a 16 & pay the msrp difference

Posted

Just bought $412 of oil. 2 five gallon pails of Mobil Delvac ESP 5w-40, 2 five gallon pails, and 5 one gallon jugs of Mobil Delvac 1300 15w-40.

 

Rebates of $195.

 

$217 after rebate.

Posted

Used the truck for a "Trunk or Treat" Cub Scout event. Nothing fancy but the kids got a kick out of it. Doing it again tonight for work on base.

  • Like 1
Posted

Used the truck for a "Trunk or Treat" Cub Scout event. Nothing fancy but the kids got a kick out of it. Doing it again tonight for work on base.

Thats cool [emoji106]
Posted

Heads up to everyone who has to stare at/drive/put up with crappy GM quality and is sick of it.

 

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/10/29/ford-set-to-launch-huge-sale-next-week/

 

I know Dodge is the current favorite to defect to, but curious how big the discounts will be

Doubt they will include HD models though, that's what I'm aiming for
Posted

Changed oil. Only recovered about 4.5 quarts. So some may have been deep in the filter media, but im claiming it either burned or leaked in the 10,000 miles and 1 year it was in there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...