Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, BluEyeItln said:

Hi All,

 

I have been researching lift kits and have not seen anyone comparing them to each other with their differences and so on.  I'm basically planning on lifting the front 4" and the rear 2".  This is for lifting and leveling as well as helping me be able to put 33's on my truck.  I have read and read about Rough Country, FabTech, Pro Comp and with all the reading, I cannot figure out what works best for my use.  My truck is a daily pavement pounder and would go off road or have a need for it possibly a few times a year.  I obviously would like it to ride like it does stock.  I just can't find a site anywhere that compares the lift kits.

 

Does anyone have any comparison info to help me out?

 

THX

Trying to do the same thing, have 1 1/2" level kit. Spoke to someone who recommended removing it, and installing a reading 4" suspension lift. Retains the stock shocks, replaces the upper control arms, and will make the truck level. Was going to do the zone 1" body lift, but he said this was a much better option

Posted
9 hours ago, DanZ71 said:

Trying to do the same thing, have 1 1/2" level kit. Spoke to someone who recommended removing it, and installing a reading 4" suspension lift. Retains the stock shocks, replaces the upper control arms, and will make the truck level. Was going to do the zone 1" body lift, but he said this was a much better option

I have multiple quotes from different places on different brands.

 

ProComp - $3200

FabTech - $2000

Rough Country - $1600

 

I'll take any comments, referrals and thoughts. 

Posted

I like the BDS 6inch lift. It is a full strut replacement lift system and are better than the cheap rancho struts that come stock. And if your vehicle is approaching an age where it will need new shocks soon, you are causing yourself double the hassle by installing a zone lift kit or any other kit that uses front strut spacers for lift because you will end up spending more money on labor replacing the stock struts down the line sooner rather than later.  Plus you can run 35x12.5s with minimum trimming on a 6in lift. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, nathanj485 said:

I like the BDS 6inch lift. It is a full strut replacement lift system and are better than the cheap rancho struts that come stock. And if your vehicle is approaching an age where it will need new shocks soon, you are causing yourself double the hassle by installing a zone lift kit or any other kit that uses front strut spacers for lift because you will end up spending more money on labor replacing the stock struts down the line sooner rather than later.  Plus you can run 35x12.5s with minimum trimming on a 6in lift. 

Thank you. I decided to go with the Readylift 4". I really like how my truck looks, I like the wheel wells to be full. GM unfortunately has very narrow wheel openings which greatly restricts the use of larger tires, so you have to lift the truck far higher then others, and I don't like that look. I'll post pics Friday or Sat when its finished.

On 8/11/2019 at 1:28 PM, BluEyeItln said:

Hi All,

 

I have been researching lift kits and have not seen anyone comparing them to each other with their differences and so on.  I'm basically planning on lifting the front 4" and the rear 2".  This is for lifting and leveling as well as helping me be able to put 33's on my truck.  I have read and read about Rough Country, FabTech, Pro Comp and with all the reading, I cannot figure out what works best for my use.  My truck is a daily pavement pounder and would go off road or have a need for it possibly a few times a year.  I obviously would like it to ride like it does stock.  I just can't find a site anywhere that compares the lift kits.

 

Does anyone have any comparison info to help me out?

 

THX

Trying to do the same thing, have 1 1/2" level kit. Spoke to someone who recommended removing it, and installing a reading 4" suspension lift. Retains the stock shocks, replaces the upper control arms, and will make the truck level. Was going to do the zone 1" body lift, but he said this was a much better option

Posted

Not a big fan of stuffing the wheel wells. Seems counterintuitive to having a lift kit, especially if you plan on off roading where clearance is important. You don’t want to be scraping the bottom of your truck on tree branches and rocks and the more clearance you have, the deeper water you can tread without worrying about flooding your exhaust.  I run a 6inch BDS with Fox 2.0s. 20x10 Fuels. 35x12.50 Nitto Ridge.

0DA1E144-6CB5-4D55-A9B2-FAE284222905.jpeg

  • Like 4
Posted
12 hours ago, nathanj485 said:

Not a big fan of stuffing the wheel wells. Seems counterintuitive to having a lift kit, especially if you plan on off roading where clearance is important. You don’t want to be scraping the bottom of your truck on tree branches and rocks and the more clearance you have, the deeper water you can tread without worrying about flooding your exhaust.  I run a 6inch BDS with Fox 2.0s. 20x10 Fuels. 35x12.50 Nitto Ridge.

0DA1E144-6CB5-4D55-A9B2-FAE284222905.jpeg

Good looking truck!

  • Like 2
Posted
On 8/14/2019 at 12:16 AM, nathanj485 said:

I like the BDS 6inch lift. It is a full strut replacement lift system and are better than the cheap rancho struts that come stock. And if your vehicle is approaching an age where it will need new shocks soon, you are causing yourself double the hassle by installing a zone lift kit or any other kit that uses front strut spacers for lift because you will end up spending more money on labor replacing the stock struts down the line sooner rather than later.  Plus you can run 35x12.5s with minimum trimming on a 6in lift. 

 

10 hours ago, 15KSChevy said:

Good looking truck!

Your truck looks great

  • Like 1
Posted

Details are in signature. Best decision I ever made was ripping that ... Rough Country lift off my truck.

If you’re going to lift make sure you do it right first time. Don’t be like me and spend over $8000 fixing your mistake.

38614d77108b42dc093e0608f562ede8.jpg

4238fbfc3f734772038d4fc3a507015e.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
Not a big fan of stuffing the wheel wells. Seems counterintuitive to having a lift kit, especially if you plan on off roading where clearance is important. You don’t want to be scraping the bottom of your truck on tree branches and rocks and the more clearance you have, the deeper water you can tread without worrying about flooding your exhaust.  I run a 6inch BDS with Fox 2.0s. 20x10 Fuels. 35x12.50 Nitto Ridge.
0DA1E144-6CB5-4D55-A9B2-FAE284222905.thumb.jpeg.e1231fc4f7737fe00c9fea47cc3b746c.jpeg

Looks GREAT!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I have multiple quotes from different places on different brands.

 

ProComp - $3200

FabTech - $2000

Rough Country - $1600

 

I'll take any comments, referrals and thoughts. 

 

Look at doing a CST 4.5” lift, retains factory track width and turning radius as well as front shocks “if” you want to keep them which I’d highly recommend not to. All you’d have to do is add longer new rear shocks.

 

The Kit: $1600 plus install

Rear shocks: $200 (Bilstein 5100’s)

 

https://www.newlevelmotorsports.com/cskc3191.html?cmp=googleproducts&kw=cskc3191&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItZ2b4PCE5AIVzf_jBx0G5wddEAQYASABEgLHPPD_BwE

 

CST is top notch, outstanding quality!

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
So I’ve looked at what seems like a million kits and I figured I’d go ahead and ask opinions. Truck is a 2018 GMC 1500, 2WD. Looking at lifts 6”-7”, was looking at the Zone 6.5” kit and lots of people like that, but for ride quality have been looking at coilovers. Is there any way to add coilovers to the Zone kit or do I need to look at another lift? Pro Comp, Mcgaughys, it’s quite a bit to take in. Any help is welcomed.


You can add high quality CST, King, Fox Coil Overs and possibly some cheaper ones to though I’d avoid the cheaper ones.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
i need a lift guys .. not sure on what to do. i want to run fuel d509 deep lip 20x12 on toyo at2 extremes or nitto ridge grapplers. i hope to run 33.5 or 34 x 12.5s my front sits exactly 2.5in lower than rear. i can change rim size to a 20x9 with less offset n less lip. what do ya'll think would be best lift for what i want without going crazy? i was thinking 3.5 front n 1 rear? would that work? thanks -1.thumb.jpg.e37f38aa85ef53da870e0e23a9dca47e.jpg20190809_194540-1.thumb.jpg.8ca71f1026f29f771ab4d9d07f6107e1.jpg

 

I’d highly recommend CST 4.5” Lift!

BDS is owned by Fox, good lift but CST is a far superior lift. Zone is the lower end owned by BDS and a great value but both BDS and Zone will give you that stupid widened look that ruins your turning radius and track width (unless you’re into that) which requires you to rethink your tires and wheels offset as well as requiring you to add controversial rear spacers to get your rears to match front widened track width.

 

I’ve got the CST 4.5” and LOVE IT! Very comfortable daily driver and you can fit anywhere.

 

2.25” Leveled with 33’s +1 offset

1056eec614d774f06b90bc243fca8a62.jpg

 

CST 4.5” Lift with same wheels 295/60/20’s (34”)

542367b095e0b17b3a99f9e4b0c04437.jpgcbd98a6201b073119c8f2cf9385b70a6.jpg101055ce86e9bb58a3ba8d7de4bb2a36.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
On 8/15/2019 at 5:44 AM, TXGREEK said:

 

I’d highly recommend CST 4.5” Lift!

BDS is owned by Fox, good lift but CST is a far superior lift. Zone is the lower end owned by BDS and a great value but both BDS and Zone will give you that stupid widened look that ruins your turning radius and track width (unless you’re into that) which requires you to rethink your tires and wheels offset as well as requiring you to add controversial rear spacers to get your rears to match front widened track width.

 

I’ve got the CST 4.5” and LOVE IT! Very comfortable daily driver and you can fit anywhere.

 

2.25” Leveled with 33’s +1 offset

1056eec614d774f06b90bc243fca8a62.jpg

 

CST 4.5” Lift with same wheels 295/60/20’s (34”)

542367b095e0b17b3a99f9e4b0c04437.jpgcbd98a6201b073119c8f2cf9385b70a6.jpg101055ce86e9bb58a3ba8d7de4bb2a36.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

damit. i didnt read your post till now. ugh.. i did go with the bds 4" lift 712h kit. as well as moto metal mo970s gloss black  20x10 -24 o/s w 33x12.5 ridge grapplers. install next tues. hope i made the right choice. thanks for the response ?

  • Like 1
Posted
damit. i didnt read your post till now. ugh.. i did go with the bds 4" lift 712h kit. as well as moto metal mo970s gloss black  20x10 -24 o/s w 33x12.5 ridge grapplers. install next tues. hope i made the right choice. thanks for the response [emoji6]


If you just ordered, cancel it or reject it unless it’s to late. But, you’ll be fine, you’ll definitely need rear spacers probably 1.75”, hope it all goes well for you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
14 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


If you just ordered, cancel it or reject it unless it’s to late. But, you’ll be fine, you’ll definitely need rear spacers probably 1.75”, hope it all goes well for you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ya its a done deal.  but i think ill be happy. why ya suggest the rear spacers? is it my offset or is it the fact the rear is narrower from factory/stock n it will look/stand out as so.. thanks again for your feed back, its very helpfull

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,838 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...